Pages:
Author

Topic: Man gets life in prison for selling $20 worth of weed to undercover cop - page 2. (Read 2521 times)

legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1515
Complete and utterly useless. A pointless imprisonment will now cost tax payers hundreds of thousands over his life time while he's sitting there for a non-violent crime. Completely uncalled for.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373

Who the hell would think this is an ok sentence or the right thing to do?


Obviously some people think it's ok, laws are made by man you know  Tongue

All I'm saying is it doesn't matter how trivial you think your crime is, you just can't live the way you want while expecting life to go easy on you. The minute you do something, anything, you no longer have a say or choice, your past/reality already contains that action and any series of events unfolding from that point in time is completely independent of your plans or your idea of fairness. It's about taking full responsibility for everything you do. You can't for instance go to buy weed while ruling out the possibility that you might get shot. It doesn't matter that chances you get shot are less than 0.001%.

Any action is a testament to one's acceptance of the myriad of possible timelines stemming from that point.

Humans seem to have lost this primordial synchronicity with themselves. They do whatever they please but then are filled with regret or are shocked by the consequences of their actions.

Laws aren't made by regular people or their peers, they are made by a very select (often very well off) group.

I'm sure you've heard the expression, "Let the punishment fit the crime." A trivial crime deserves nothing more than a trivial punishment. This IS what is expected. Going by your logic, "taking full responsibility", you should also get a life sentence for collecting rain water illegally, if it's your third strike.

Getting shot has nothing to do with this. You can get shot by a stray bullet, while sitting in your own living room. Just stepping out your front door is an invitation for any number of possibilities to occur. Still this does not justify any injustices that may be made against you.

While I agree that many people have lost touch with reality, I can't help but feel your own post is evidence of this. The OP is about a victimless crime for which there should be no other consequence other than a 'thank you' from the buyer. Any other consequence is completely unrelated except through unjust laws, made by self-righteous elitist douchbags acting as though they are doing a public service, for the purpose of stealing more tax dollars from the poor (middle class) to feed the artificially bloated criminal justice system. In Common Law, there must be a victim for there to be a crime made. The only victim here is the poor guy in the OP.

Why do laws apply to you?

Imagine that a small group of kids down the street start a club. They make laws that they say apply to you. Do the laws they make apply to you? Why or why not?

Make them show why their laws apply to you as a man/woman. There has to be harm or damage done. Do it in the courts so that there is much less chance that one of their stray bullets comes after you.

If you stand present in court, demanding that your accuser come forth onto the stand so you can question him regarding the validity of harm or damage he is making against you, they can't do it.

1. There is no harm or damage done.
2. The State or Federal can't get on the stand.

Case dismissed.

But if you don't do it this way, you have condemned yourself.

Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500
I like boobies

Who the hell would think this is an ok sentence or the right thing to do?


Obviously some people think it's ok, laws are made by man you know  Tongue

All I'm saying is it doesn't matter how trivial you think your crime is, you just can't live the way you want while expecting life to go easy on you. The minute you do something, anything, you no longer have a say or choice, your past/reality already contains that action and any series of events unfolding from that point in time is completely independent of your plans or your idea of fairness. It's about taking full responsibility for everything you do. You can't for instance go to buy weed while ruling out the possibility that you might get shot. It doesn't matter that chances you get shot are less than 0.001%.

Any action is a testament to one's acceptance of the myriad of possible timelines stemming from that point.

Humans seem to have lost this primordial synchronicity with themselves. They do whatever they please but then are filled with regret or are shocked by the consequences of their actions.

Laws aren't made by regular people or their peers, they are made by a very select (often very well off) group.

I'm sure you've heard the expression, "Let the punishment fit the crime." A trivial crime deserves nothing more than a trivial punishment. This IS what is expected. Going by your logic, "taking full responsibility", you should also get a life sentence for collecting rain water illegally, if it's your third strike.

Getting shot has nothing to do with this. You can get shot by a stray bullet, while sitting in your own living room. Just stepping out your front door is an invitation for any number of possibilities to occur. Still this does not justify any injustices that may be made against you.

While I agree that many people have lost touch with reality, I can't help but feel your own post is evidence of this. The OP is about a victimless crime for which there should be no other consequence other than a 'thank you' from the buyer. Any other consequence is completely unrelated except through unjust laws, made by self-righteous elitist douchbags acting as though they are doing a public service, for the purpose of stealing more tax dollars from the poor (middle class) to feed the artificially bloated criminal justice system. In Common Law, there must be a victim for there to be a crime made. The only victim here is the poor guy in the OP.
full member
Activity: 159
Merit: 100
Bill Maher made a really sharp point at the end of his most recent Real Talk show.  Basically encouraging POTUS to pardon all non-violent drug offenders.  I am hoping that actually happens.

Ha, yeah right. He'll likely pardon a few white collar crooks like they usually do. Would be cool if he pardoned Snowden but that;s not going to happen.

It just goes to show the difference between the rich and the poor
If your extremely poor they will find any excuse to keep you in there for life and off the streets.

What sort of rules are there to this three strikes and you're out? Does it have to be a serious felony crime and then any two smaller ones or is it any three crimes no matter how small? If the latter there's plenty of celebs that get let off numerous times.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1005
Betting Championship betking.io/sports-leaderboard
^ Yes and being exploited for your work in prison too.
And the rich bankers that laundered billions of dollars for drug cartels got away with it because no one wants to touch them. : /
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It just goes to show the difference between the rich and the poor
If your extremely poor they will find any excuse to keep you in there for life and off the streets.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
Bill Maher made a really sharp point at the end of his most recent Real Talk show.  Basically encouraging POTUS to pardon all non-violent drug offenders.  I am hoping that actually happens.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000

Who the hell would think this is an ok sentence or the right thing to do?


Obviously some people think it's ok, laws are made by man you know  Tongue

All I'm saying is it doesn't matter how trivial you think your crime is, you just can't live the way you want while expecting life to go easy on you. The minute you do something, anything, you no longer have a say or choice, your past/reality already contains that action and any series of events unfolding from that point in time is completely independent of your plans or your idea of fairness. It's about taking full responsibility for everything you do. You can't for instance go to buy weed while ruling out the possibility that you might get shot. It doesn't matter that chances you get shot are less than 0.001%.

Any action is a testament to one's acceptance of the myriad of possible timelines stemming from that point.

Humans seem to have lost this primordial synchronicity with themselves. They do whatever they please but then are filled with regret or are shocked by the consequences of their actions.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I can draw your avatar!
Life sentence for $20 worth of weed is certainly questionable. However you'd expect someone who's been convicted 3 times already to have come to terms with the shortcomings of his/her particular lifestyle. I'd imagine that after serving his first sentence, he would've already decided that going back to prison is an acceptable risk when it comes to fulfilling his needs.
Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time. I understand that the guy might have been dealt a particularly shitty hand from the start but that's no excuse for not taking full responsibility for one's actions/choices.

He's homeless and out of a job, so plenty of time. But it is backwards, he's just a small catch in a much bigger scheme, it does not solve the crime, he will be replaced with yet one of the many stumped down people that got bitten by the economic crisis. He might be better off, food and shelter for the rest of his life for only $20,- of investment, that is a bargain.

The real criminals still go on doing their business. This man serving his time will not make the world a better place. It will not get rid of other small crumb dealers, they should focus on the real crimes behind it and spend the tax money there, not on a life in prison.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
I am appalled by the fact that someone can get a life sentence for this. The US three strike rule is ludicrous. The above article has very little details. It was after reading the article linked below that I learned it was his third strike.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/02/27/fate-vincent-winslow-got-life-in-prison-for-20-worth-of-weed.html

Agreed. I can't believe this is actual practice in the States. I could understand maybe on your third strike you get a small prison sentence - and I mean small - but not life. If it was a serious crime maybe but not for silly little ones like this especially when it looks like entrapment as well.

Life sentence for $20 worth of weed is certainly questionable.

Questionable? He sold some weed. Who the hell would think this is an ok sentence or the right thing to do?

However you'd expect someone who's been convicted 3 times already to have come to terms with the shortcomings of his/her particular lifestyle. I'd imagine that after serving his first sentence, he would've already decided that going back to prison is an acceptable risk when it comes to fulfilling his needs.
Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time. I understand that the guy might have been dealt a particularly shitty hand from the start but that's no excuse for not taking full responsibility for one's actions/choices.

But there shouldn't be any 'time' for selling a small amount of weed especially not a life sentence or anywhere near it. Some people don't have many options to survive and if that's the case then selling small amounts of drugs may be his only recourse.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
Life sentence for $20 worth of weed is certainly questionable. However you'd expect someone who's been convicted 3 times already to have come to terms with the shortcomings of his/her particular lifestyle. I'd imagine that after serving his first sentence, he would've already decided that going back to prison is an acceptable risk when it comes to fulfilling his needs.
Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time. I understand that the guy might have been dealt a particularly shitty hand from the start but that's no excuse for not taking full responsibility for one's actions/choices.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 251
Where I live (northern state), this would be considered a misdemeanor and carry a punishment of a year on probation, drug counseling and fines. The southern conservative states typically are ass backwards when it comes to drug sentencing. I've seen cases of meth dealers in Oklahoma serving over a 100 yrs as a sentence yet someone convicted of 2nd degree murder would get life w/ parole. In most cases, whenever state try to loosen certain drug laws the police chiefs show up in force and fearmonger and legislatures always cower to them. weak
Some EU countries are slowly legalizing it (I think the last one was Czech Republic in 2013). The others treat it as light offenses. In Poland for example the case is sent to court, that drops it if it's the first time and the guy isn't a dealer. If he was selling the verdict will most likely be a suspended sentence.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
Where I live (northern state), this would be considered a misdemeanor and carry a punishment of a year on probation, drug counseling and fines. The southern conservative states typically are ass backwards when it comes to drug sentencing. I've seen cases of meth dealers in Oklahoma serving over a 100 yrs as a sentence yet someone convicted of 2nd degree murder would get life w/ parole. In most cases, whenever state try to loosen certain drug laws the police chiefs show up in force and fearmonger and legislatures always cower to them. weak

to make them pay their sins, theirs rain will become corrupt, their soil will become corrupt, their air will become corrupt, the sun will not warm their heart and for generation they will see their children and the children of their children being born corrupt. This is the gift they deserve, and it will be endless.

Have fun all, I leave this forum as there is absolutely no point in saying anything anymore. Alea Jacta Est.

God is the Greatest, and those aren't his Children, or if it so be (which isn't the case), I prefer to stay with the Unbowing (determination, perseverance, only before God, I know, Angel too can lie), to the End.
 
hf & gl with the population retracement...

edit: posted on the first hours of what they call march 2015.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Time to make your public defender into your co-council by noticing the bench in writing, and then stating it. This way you are not represented by him/her, and yet you can keep him as someone who can help you through the rigors of court when you need him, like for legal advice.

Then, notice the court that you are standing as a man. If you have time to file with the court clerk ahead of time, do it. If you don't, in court require 3 minutes leave of court, pen and paper, and write your notice. If you can't write, your co-council can write it for you.

What do you write on the notice? Three sentences. In simple words, state that you are a man (woman), present, not being represented by anyone, nor representing yourself. On a second sentence, write wording wishing and requiring any man or woman that you have harmed or damaged to appear, show, and press into the record (speak it on the stand) the damage and harm you did to them, with witness and evidence that you were the one who did the damage or harm, so that you can reimburse them for the damage or harm. A third sentence would be that you require the one accusing you to appear.

These three sentences will throw the judge and the prosecutor into such a tizzy that they will attempt all kinds of things to intimidate you into changing your notice by verbal or written statement. Remain firm, however, stating that you stand by your notice. That's all you state. You never state any more except that you may be required to read your notice aloud. If you can't read, this is the only time your co-council speaks in court, and then immediately stand up and state that he is misreading if he does.

The plaintiff must appear. This is a long-standing legal requirement. A lawyer can't represent the plaintiff if you stand as a human being. The one who is written on the complaint must appear. If it is THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE STATE OF XXXXXX on the complaint, it must be Mr., Mrs., or Ms. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE STATE OF XXXXXX who appears. If the plaintiff doesn't appear, no case.

If the judge dismisses the case, require the case to be discharged so that they can't come back after you in the future by reopening the same case.

If the judge doesn't do the things you require under a circumstance like this, you will need to ask him if he is perpetrating fraud upon the court. If you do this, you will need to file a claim against the man acting as judge (not on the judge - not on the position) for personally not following the rules of court and thereby doing you harm or damage.

Four places you can go to start your training on what to do if the government takes you to court are listed below. Start now. You aren't going to learn this stuff overnight.

http://voidjudgments.com/ which will show you the basic things that they don't want you to know.

http://1215.org/ for an understanding of how the law really works, if only you use it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D start here for info about Karl Lentz. We all need to study his methods, because he isn't a fearful pussyfooter when it comes to standing in court.

Some of the best info about Karl and his process can be found here http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
Where I live (northern state), this would be considered a misdemeanor and carry a punishment of a year on probation, drug counseling and fines. The southern conservative states typically are ass backwards when it comes to drug sentencing. I've seen cases of meth dealers in Oklahoma serving over a 100 yrs as a sentence yet someone convicted of 2nd degree murder would get life w/ parole. In most cases, whenever state try to loosen certain drug laws the police chiefs show up in force and fearmonger and legislatures always cower to them. weak
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
Wow, how can someone get a life sentence for trying to sell 20$ worth of weed. Thats crazy

yes they did it. date=1425156546 (what ever that means). Because it's the law, that's the new (in fact old) scam of the so called democratic west. as it's law it must be followed, what ever you feel, because it's an order, the law, the supreme law... legalistic empires crumble the faster. paper burns so fast. and the pro of moving it, will have left before you realize there are paper smokes. It's impossible in a demo - cracy to make toxic food legal. 101. But what is this "demo"? What are the criterions to take decisions that will affect my will to live? nothing, to be born and vote. What I love is when those "demo - cracy " do secret laws or so complex that one persons can't read it. so there is always legal insecurity, that they exploit. finally it's demo cracy, in the sense of idiots are exploited to jail themselves. wonderful creation.

legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1017
A homeless and hungry man gets a room and a hot(cold?) meal in prison for life out of the tax payers money.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 123
"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"
1 man in jail for a victimless crime equates 1 woman more available. furthermore it provides Keynesians values chain creation, that permits said real criminals apes to profit even more.  Cry
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 500
I like boobies
http://boingboing.net/2015/02/27/man-gets-life-in-prison-for-se.html

Quote
A homeless and hungry man agreed to purchase $20 worth of weed for a stranger in exchange for a $5 finder's fee. After the man received his $5 (marked by the police) he was arrested and jailed.

"Six months later, a jury found him guilty of distribution of a schedule I substance (marijuana). Three months after that, a judge sentenced him to life imprisonment with hard labor, without the benefit of parole."

I am appalled by the fact that someone can get a life sentence for this. The US three strike rule is ludicrous. The above article has very little details. It was after reading the article linked below that I learned it was his third strike.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/02/27/fate-vincent-winslow-got-life-in-prison-for-20-worth-of-weed.html
Pages:
Jump to: