Author

Topic: [Marketplace] Seller deleting and reposting bumps to hide rule violations. (Read 1045 times)

copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
Out of curiosity, were these people warned in some way previously, or do we no longer give out warnings?

If someone is overbumping, they are typically warned. If they are making an effort to delete their posts and rebump as a workaround an established rule, that means they obviously know about the bumping rule and are knowingly breaking it. Warnings are set in place for those who don't know the rules, need a reminder, etc, not as a cushion for those who think they will be safe breaking the rules expecting a warning shot before the hammer.
Deleting old bumps, and limiting bumps to once every 24 hours are two separate rules.

Deleting old bumps (should be) a rule on pretty much every marketplace like forum, plus deleting old bumps keeps the seller's thread "clean" and easy to read.

The 24 hour limit on bump frequency is an arbitrary time (which I agree is a fair amount of time), which may be different in other marketplace forums. Some forums may limit bumps to every 24 hours, others may limit bumps to every 72 hours and others may limit bumps to every 6 hours. I don't think it is fair to say that someone knows that bumps should be limited to once every 24 hours just because they remove old bumps.

Out of curiosity, were these people warned in some way previously, or do we no longer give out warnings?

I give out warnings if they're reported as bump spamming but if they ignore it they get a ban. It's getting annoying though and difficult to enforce effectively. Far too many scammers just coming back on alt accounts and spam bumping day after day. I seemingly spend half of my time here removing bumps and nuking banned digital good spammer scammers.
Admins have the ability to write notes on user's accounts that are not visible to others. There should be an option to allow some of these notes to be visible to other moderators.

Also some moderators will post asking users to delete old bumps after they delete old bumps, this serves both as a warning to the specific user, and allows this rule to be more visible.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Out of curiosity, were these people warned in some way previously, or do we no longer give out warnings?

I give out warnings if they're reported as bump spamming but if they ignore it they get a ban. It's getting annoying though and difficult to enforce effectively. Far too many scammers just coming back on alt accounts and spam bumping day after day. I seemingly spend half of my time here removing bumps and nuking banned digital good spammer scammers.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2154
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
Out of curiosity, were these people warned in some way previously, or do we no longer give out warnings?

If someone is overbumping, they are typically warned. If they are making an effort to delete their posts and rebump as a workaround an established rule, that means they obviously know about the bumping rule and are knowingly breaking it. Warnings are set in place for those who don't know the rules, need a reminder, etc, not as a cushion for those who think they will be safe breaking the rules expecting a warning shot before the hammer.
copper member
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
Out of curiosity, were these people warned in some way previously, or do we no longer give out warnings?
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Not directly related, as the seller is not deleting the previous bumps, but still a rule violation, and I need a reference for my report, so here we go.



Seller 5: LGG4

Thread in question: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hearthstone-acc-60-legendaries-10-golden-165-epics-2999-1728122
Archives of their violation: http://archive.is/XQMtv#90% (Thread being bumped 4 times in a matter of 24 hours)

Another thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/hall-11-level-159-king-40-queen-40-warden-20-1727616
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/oPuXU#65% (Aswell been bumped 4 times in 24 hours)

And one more thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/level-9-7-legendary-arena-9-trophy-2985-1728085
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/Vkfz8#88% (Same here, bumped 4 times in 24 hours)

Next thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/overwatch-account-4k-rating-top-500-40-1729130
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/UZK2G#80% (Thread made today, bumped 2 times already)

Going on: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pokemon-go-account-lvl-40-1726711
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/cqg97#75% (Bumped 4 times + 1 answer to a question)



Further, those are all for digital accounts of some sort and might aswell be listed together.
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
Been some time, anyway.



Seller 4: ustradebitcoin
Thread in question: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/biggest-sale-this-week-from-broker-sites-1702560
Archives of their violation: http://archive.is/eLKJL http://archive.is/Zw0DR
Another thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/top-3-best-and-short-domain-name-for-sale-1697285
Archives aswell: http://archive.is/4oB5n http://archive.is/xvC8L

Another similar thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinliveinfocomdomain-name-for-sale-1704601 (http://archive.is/xhQVQ).

Besides violating the forum rules by this kind of bumping, their threads are reasonably similar (all for domains) and should be listed together in the first place (at least in my opinion).
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
hashkey still seems to be at it.
In multiple threads.

Sample of 1 thread.
http://archive.is/CibET
http://archive.is/vvrY4
administrator
Activity: 3738
Merit: 2948
copper member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
As reporting of a specific scheme some seller use in order to hide their rule violations can get tricky in a single report,
this thread will serve as reference for those reports.
(It also can serve as reference for connected problems/rule violations, to keep Meta from cluttering up with single purpose threads.)



Seller 1: AmazonAWS
Thread in question: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/amazon-aws-credit-ses-accounts-1000-event-codes-escrow-vouches-1669783
Archives of their violation: http://archive.is/mwNcK http://archive.is/ABcxk http://archive.is/SRHzK
Jump to: