Topic: marlboroza : trust abuser - page 2. (Read 844 times)
Hey, thanks for removing it.
Let's discuss what I created the thread for: you copied a trust feedback for the sake of maintaining the worst sentiment on my profile (The Pharmacist had a good point up there about that - regardless if it was "in my favor" or not). Sentiment is never clear headed, in many cases we see it coming from tainted/skewed outlooks/mindsets.
Give me a second, I will change it. Ok we've veered off course .. I'll have to catch up.
Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..
Good for you. What this has to do with this thread?Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..
Now go and tell your buddy who btw logged in somewhere at the same time as you to answer me in lending thread, I have to go to bed.
> On this one page of this thread
How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...
How [...seeabove...] not newbie...
Ok, I'm not the only one 
[/quote]
No, you don't and no, I don't have to. You are certainly someone's alt.
You are certainly someone's alt.
Of course he is. I'd be willing to bet whose alt it is, too.Guys, tell to some moderator to track my ip or do it by youraelf if your able and you'll see this is my only accounnt here.
You are sounding more and more like mdayonliner with each post.All wasted characters, including your snide remarks/"funny" jokes. Not much point in being condescending that way Marlboroza.
Let's discuss what I created the thread for: you copied a trust feedback for the sake of maintaining the worst sentiment on my profile (The Pharmacist had a good point up there about that - regardless if it was "in my favor" or not). Sentiment is never clear headed, in many cases we see it coming from tainted/skewed outlooks/mindsets.
I don't know if it was discussed before (if so, apologies...i went through those few threads quickly) but i'd like to make a very small point about alexrossi and his involvement in all this.
DadyD's original loan request topic was posted a day earlier in the Italian local board, where alexrossi confirms that he will serve as an escrow/guarantee or whatever his position might be.
As i said, just a small detail, nothing more.
DadyD's original loan request topic was posted a day earlier in the Italian local board, where alexrossi confirms that he will serve as an escrow/guarantee or whatever his position might be.
As i said, just a small detail, nothing more.
Ok we've veered off course .. I'll have to catch up.
Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..
Good for you. What this has to do with this thread?Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..
Now go and tell your buddy who btw logged in somewhere at the same time as you to answer me in lending thread, I have to go to bed.
Ok we've veered off course .. I'll have to catch up.
Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..
Let's try not to fall into the whose-who alt game. Fact is we can never know for sure - all I can say is I have no idea who is behind DadyD..
Guys, tell to some moderator to track my ip or do it by youraelf if your able and you'll see this is my only accounnt here.
You are sounding more and more like mdayonliner with each post. 
Who copies and pastes someone else's negative feedback after they change it to a neutral.
That isn't trust abuse by itself. It could well be that marlboroza thought the neutral feedback should have remained a negative. And as far as copying someone's feedback, I've seen that happen many times. For instance, Lauda and I often have left the same feedback "Account sellers are not to be trusted". Other members have left the same feedback as well--and as long as the sentiment is genuine, I don't have a problem with that. Lots of idiots around here have abused the trust system and continue to do so. Marlboroza isn't one of them, though.
You are certainly someone's alt.
Of course he is. I'd be willing to bet whose alt it is, too. 
Am I the only one cringing at this newbie defending marco, even regarding marco's past transgressions?
Ok, I'm not the only one
How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...
Ok, I'm not the only one
I'm defending him becouse its my fault (almost) if hes in this situation and i try to def him in hope that he will get a less punishment...And about hes past, i dont judge him, he was a nice person to me and i do same..Hard to understand that?
Guys, tell to some moderator to track my ip or do it by youraelf if your able and you'll see this is my only accounnt here.
I'm using my brain...and before to accuse other to be alt, bring proof.
No, you don't and no, I don't have to. You are certainly someone's alt. Bring constructive messagges and constructive opinions otherwhise your just growing up your post count.
2. Posts [...] or under 100 characters will not be paid.
https://i.imgur.com/zoze89b.png
Oh fuck, I missed 5 characters. Quoted for record, brand new newbie account trust farmer knows something about signature post count. So, Mr Trust Farm where is abuse?
Keep you idea up ma friend...one day you'll accept that fact
And just to be fair, i even mentioned the word "abuse" Have a good day, i'm going to work. I'm using my brain...and before to accuse other to be alt, bring proof.
No, you don't and no, I don't have to. You are certainly someone's alt. Bring constructive messagges and constructive opinions otherwhise your just growing up your post count.
2. Posts [...] or under 100 characters will not be paid.
Oh fuck, I missed 5 characters. Quoted for record, brand new newbie account trust farmer knows something about signature post count. So, Mr Trust Farm where is abuse?
Am I the only one cringing at this newbie defending marco, even regarding marco's past transgressions?
Ok, I'm not the only one
How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...
Ok, I'm not the only one
Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?
How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie...As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?
Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?
https://i.imgur.com/e2TKdOj.png
Either way it's still not a big deal that needs to be addressed publicly. Personal messages are there for a reason, unless they have 1 another blocked. If that's the case then likely it wouldn't get the result he wanted anyways.
You spin it however you want to spin it man. I could care less.
Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?
How newbie trust farmer knows so much about forum's trust system? Unless they are not newbie... 
As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?
Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?
Either way it's still not a big deal that needs to be addressed publicly. Personal messages are there for a reason, unless they have 1 another blocked. If that's the case then likely it wouldn't get the result he wanted anyways.
You spin it however you want to spin it man. I could care less.
As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?
Actually...He received 5 negative feedbacks in the same post, not to mention that some of the users who left feedback did not even respond to the thread. Not even the lender left the negative feedback, only the others. If those 5 negative feedbacks are to be considered as 5 negative actions, then we might as well spam the forum of new users and send negative feedback to everyone, who cares so much just the numbers count, right?
and just to be fair in this situation...@marco Stop saying contradictory things ... I know you're panicked and you're trying to get out of it but believe me, I'm taking you in, I see you're digging your own pit ...Sorry for seing that but its the truth...your changing your version of facts..I hope everything goes well...
As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point?
Actually, he had 3 -ve before my so we could talk about "5 abusers" "after me"....
@marcotheminer you can keep or remove my name from your sig space, doesn't matter to me either way. As for why you were removed, I told you I was giving you a chance as long as no other bs popped up. Well this trust bs popped up. I'm not gonna have you in a campaign getting paid to defend your reputation. Would have been better just to not be involved don't ya think?
As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point? He will have his opinion, you have your rebuttal. Move on. He either accepts your reply and removes the mark or does not and the mark stays. Seems like the more you reply, the more he wants to keep his feedback there.
As far as marlboroza being a trust abuser, trust is not moderated so who cares? You already had 8 DT members hitting you with neg rep, what's 1 more at this point? He will have his opinion, you have your rebuttal. Move on. He either accepts your reply and removes the mark or does not and the mark stays. Seems like the more you reply, the more he wants to keep his feedback there.
Was marco angling for shasan to use him (marco) as the escrow in that deal? Obviously marco will claim he was not LOL.
Even more odd; I think he was "assuring" that the newbie would pay back.
That's why I'm asking. This "assurance" sounded to me like marco was telling shasan "I'm the escrow, y u no lend?".
I thought you meant the one in meta? I locked it, so you can repost here or edit the one above if that works or was the plan.
Just scroll up and read marlboroza's edited post, how hard can it be to slow down for a few seconds?
Assure defintion: tell someone something positively to dispel any doubts.
I had enough to cover a 0.0015BTC loan..This is why I wrote what I wrote.
I had enough to cover a 0.0015BTC loan..This is why I wrote what I wrote.
Which makes zero difference to anyone unless you're trying to imply that you're some sort of independent trusted third party, the word for which escapes me right now... wait, let's ask someone really smart that you absolutely trust, what was it that you were trying to do?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52685004
Quote
As for backing out before his 2nd loan demand - I gave the 1st loan because I saw it as a fair risk/reward. That's how you loan at the end of the day, what he does with funds is none of my business. Then the 2nd one came around with me as escrow, I didn't think anything bad of it until he posted what he did.
I'll address that, he's from country I just moved from so I guess there was a rapport made quicker than usual.
I think mdayonliner exhausted that excuse.
@marcothesschmuck read my post. You are making fool of yourself at the moment. Sometimes is better to be honest
Assure defintion: tell someone something positively to dispel any doubts.
I had enough to cover a 0.0015BTC loan..This is why I wrote what I wrote.
I had enough to cover a 0.0015BTC loan..This is why I wrote what I wrote.
Jump to: