If your concept of marriage is purely materialistic, or that someone takes care of you when you reach an age, then this is not marriage, but a replacement of interests, so that you get married for a specific purpose.
Marriage is the presence of another party with whom you can be reassured and thus share your life with him so that he is a motivator for you to produce and be productive and to form a family that is beneficial to society, and then reassurance is the only condition and not the material aspect.
As for being rich in fiat or crypto, the rich is the one who knows how to divide his wealth so that it is not all in one investment, but a variety of investments in gold, dollars, bitcoins, stocks, real estate, etc., and not an investment in one investment wallet.
Topic: marry rich: marry fiat rich or crypto rich, which is better? - page 12. (Read 1431 times)
In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!
I have never been scared of staying alone because there are so many things to do apart from getting married. I have also nursed the idea of adopting children if I didn't meet any woman that is compatible with me. But I don't consider the future because I might not have control over it. How am I sure that I will ever get old? How are you sure your spouse will not die before you? The dead are conscious of nothing and don't care if it was buried or eaten by animals. And the dead don't need food for anything. Quote
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
If you marry because of money, you will be disappointed because it comes and goes. Marrying a crypto millionaire is not a bad idea if you are comfortable with his character. I don't also think that cryptocurrency is the only sector that makes people millionaire, so women still have choices. 
In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you.
WTF are you blabbering on about, dude? Please tell me you're not a legal adult, because your line of thinking is so immature that if you aren't I'm picturing some slovenly-suited slob sitting in an internet cafe somewhere in Asia, breathing through his mouth and probably leaving boogers on the damn keyboard.Let me tell ya, bro man, some people are quite happy being "foreveralone" if that's what you want to call it. Not everyone wants to live a traditional life with a husband/wife, kids, a house and at least one parent working. Hell, the new generation is blowing that lifestyle out of the water as we speak--I've heard that the youth of today are much less interested in sex than previous generations. I don't understand that at all, but I'm guessing that technology has a lot to do with it. Kids and young adults are accustomed to communicating with each other via screens rather than face-to-face interaction. I weep for all the debauchery they're going to miss, and it makes me sad.
But you don't make me sad, OP. I'd hoped you disappeared for good, but here you are with another crazy, balls-nailed-to-the-ceiling thread that defies logic. Keep 'em coming, eh?
Marrying someone rich or poor does not guarantee someone will be happy. Some people live a simple life with their partner, but they can be happy and build a simple family.
For ordinary people, marrying someone who has a lot of money is the main choice because many of them do not or are not familiar with crypto. But even if they know crypto, they probably won't choose someone rich in crypto and will still choose someone rich in fiat.
Marrying someone is not based on wealth but based on the heart. If someone is rich, that is a bonus. But if someone is poor, they can still become rich if they keep trying hard. Everything is not always about money.
For ordinary people, marrying someone who has a lot of money is the main choice because many of them do not or are not familiar with crypto. But even if they know crypto, they probably won't choose someone rich in crypto and will still choose someone rich in fiat.
Marrying someone is not based on wealth but based on the heart. If someone is rich, that is a bonus. But if someone is poor, they can still become rich if they keep trying hard. Everything is not always about money.
...it doesn't matter what he has in his possession to get wealthy; being rich is being rich, ...
the bank do not accept you to pay your debt with whatever you possess, then you aren't rich. If your name aren't on the forbes youngest list, you are too not rich....marry solely based on their partner's financial status?...
A man or a woman?
may be a banker or financier?
...I'm not rich ...
...are for the attitude and how eager you are in reaching your goals, ...
Yes. Both tangile and intangible. When money is scarce, they would look for intangible one....are for the attitude and how eager you are in reaching your goals, ...
Quote
I think as long as there's the description of "rich", it will be chosen.
three thing can be considered rich opm opr opt. money resource and time. but time give a lot less important when the rule is to rich get richer and poor get poorer, as more time is a curse to the poor where it would get poorer, but a blessing to rich get richer. So opt is useless and pretty much worthless, only matter now is opm and opr, anyway opm seem to be on the top of the food chain.
In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
It's pretty funny that you believe that when you die nobody will make a tomb for you, very funny, do you know that if a dead body is lying dead on the ground for some hours, all the people living within the place will start getting sick? Every dead bodies have their places, they can't be on the ground where people are living, if you died and you have no kids or family that can bury you, someone have to do it, for the health sake of people living in that surrounding. So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
Things have gotten to hard in the world today that you will need money to survive, its true that no female will want to live with such a man who has no dream and I don't blame them, it can be very hard to get a partner who don't give a shit about the world and that's the type of people that makes a good life partner, you need a lot of luck to have such people in your life. Still I would advice any man to never marry anybody simply because you have a lot of money, having money can be a curse at times, it is better to pretend and live a lower standard lifestyle to attract those that will love you for who you are and not your money.
Marry someone who would be there for you no matter what,
Don't settle because of money, you would marry someone because their rich? how about the way they treat you or other people? does that even matter to you?
Marry someone who could help you and understand you, who could be your peace not because of financial status but your mental peace.
If your just going to marry someone because their rich what would you do if they happen to have a rough time and end up losing their asset?
Don't settle because of money, you would marry someone because their rich? how about the way they treat you or other people? does that even matter to you?
Marry someone who could help you and understand you, who could be your peace not because of financial status but your mental peace.
If your just going to marry someone because their rich what would you do if they happen to have a rough time and end up losing their asset?
So you are asking if I would want to marry a woman, who is a crypto millionaire or a woman, who is a fiat millionaire? 
I would marry both. The problem is that I don't look like a Brad Pitt(or like a GigaChad) and those women most likely won't get attracted to me. Another problem is that I don't see many female crypto/fiat millionaires walking on the street, so I don't know where to meet them.
A rich person is a rich person. Crypto of fiat doesn't matter. Your are right about one thing. Love doesn't matter, everything is about money.
Actually several million Bitcoins are forever lost, so your ridiculous calculations won't happen.
I would marry both.
The problem is that I don't look like a Brad Pitt(or like a GigaChad) and those women most likely won't get attracted to me. Another problem is that I don't see many female crypto/fiat millionaires walking on the street, so I don't know where to meet them. A rich person is a rich person. Crypto of fiat doesn't matter. Your are right about one thing. Love doesn't matter, everything is about money.
Quote
Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich
Actually several million Bitcoins are forever lost, so your ridiculous calculations won't happen.
OP has a funny point of view with boredom, it's funny to bring marital love with material criteria. Perhaps people in this sense should re-examine themselves with what they are missing, without having and then searching for it until satisfied, there are other problems following.
The problem of the thought OP makes me laugh when I try to imagine that when I get married, I will see if that person has property or not
. And honestly I wouldn't get married for that. There are so many problems in this life connected by very contradictory connections, I wonder if they have enough time to realize that they are actually wasting their time on such things, forever. look at material things or fame.
The problem of the thought OP makes me laugh when I try to imagine that when I get married, I will see if that person has property or not
. And honestly I wouldn't get married for that. There are so many problems in this life connected by very contradictory connections, I wonder if they have enough time to realize that they are actually wasting their time on such things, forever. look at material things or fame.I don't think that's funny, and that's what's happening in our society today. If you are a handsome guy but you don't have a job with a high income, your family is not rich, and you are a poor guy. I'm pretty sure no girl will date you, let alone marry you. This may sound harsh, but it is true, and it is happening worldwide, there is no such thing as coming together and living together with love without money. The legend of love without money has ceased to exist today. You should be realistic and adapt to that.
In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone
I don't think so, with my experiences with past relationships. I'm not rich and I have nothing to boast about and even employed somehow but then, there were some of them that have been willing to settle with me and build our dreams together on our journey. There are women that are for the money and riches and that's normal for them to think about their security and future. But then, not all of them can be classified to have that standard. There are women that are for the attitude and how eager you are in reaching your goals, there are people that are also intelligent but still not yet on the peak of their riches and that's sexy on them.So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
To classify the difference of the two, I think as long as there's the description of "rich", it will be chosen. 
-snip
Who is supposed to be the one who gives importance to wealth to get married according to your scenario? A man or a woman?
In general, as much as feminazism may say, women tend to consider several things beyond physical attractiveness when it comes to marriage, such as the resources the potential husband has or can attain. As in everything, there are exceptions, and nowadays that many women have resources of their own, they do not give it so much importance. But in percentage terms, they still give more importance to the wealth of the potential husband.
So, going to the question you ask, I think it's bullshit. It doesn't matter and the one who is rich is usually not rich only in one thing. If someone gets rich with fiat, normally what he does is to use that fiat to buy houses, gold, stocks etc. And the one who is crypto rich I would say not so much but he also tends to diversify. So it doesn't matter.
...neither you are poor in or not if you want to marry you definitely get married, ...thousands of women, ...some people can be couples due to the source of your generated income,
You are talking about animal which would mate each other without boundary on the street, which is as good as meet and copulate, it is very nasty and dirty. we are human race, we have both high IQ and high EQ, the most intelligent organism in the animal kingdom. Animal rules such as mating on the street and without dating and strict selection must not be allowed to human race!
...when I try to imagine that when I get married, I will see if that person has property or not
. And honestly I wouldn't get married for that. ... look at material things or fame.
rich in property is great too. because it is also a key item for happy ending.
happy ending is not about look for fame btw. you are confused.
..., being rich is being rich, they are the same.
they are not the same imo. rich get richer do not apply to you when you are poor and get poorer. time is money only apply to you for being rich, and get richer. if you are poor, time is not money, as you are poor get poorer.r
In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!
It's ironic how some people perceive marriage as a means to escape poverty. What happened to the fundamental concept of love that marriage was intended for? Do people nowadays marry solely based on their partner's financial status? Our present-day marriages seem to have deviated from the ones our parents and grandparents had in the past. Instead of prioritizing love, our generation is more consumed with material possessions, that is why many marriages today don't seem to endure the test of time like they used to in the past, pathetic right!
Quote
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
Life does not revolve around crypto or bitcoin, and investing in them is not the only way to achieve success. There are billionaires who have invested in various industries such as fashion, food, and beverages, and they have earned more money than some people in the crypto industry. The returns on these investments may not be as fast as those in crypto, these billionaires are content with their progress. I think the fast profits and gains associated with crypto have made some people complacent and lazy, neglecting opportunities outside the crypto industry.
You're contradicting yourself, OP. When someone is rich, it doesn't matter what he has in his possession to get wealthy; being rich is being rich, thus the comparison is unnecessary. When you suggest they'd be the only crypto-rich people in the world, the mentality of 21m bitcoin being owned by 21m couples after all have been mined is likewise unrealistic.
As you mentioned, the value of bitcoin fluctuates, and there is a lot of anticipation that the price will be higher than it is now when the last bitcoin is mined. To me, if 1BTC is valued close to a million dollars by then, owning one-third of it will still make you wealthy in certain parts of the world.
Note: Not all riches come with all the pleasures of life; some are a burden you can never get out of and will regret for the rest of your life. So marriage should not be intertwined with riches; they are distinct in their own right.
As you mentioned, the value of bitcoin fluctuates, and there is a lot of anticipation that the price will be higher than it is now when the last bitcoin is mined. To me, if 1BTC is valued close to a million dollars by then, owning one-third of it will still make you wealthy in certain parts of the world.
Note: Not all riches come with all the pleasures of life; some are a burden you can never get out of and will regret for the rest of your life. So marriage should not be intertwined with riches; they are distinct in their own right.
You are laying emphasis where you shouldn't, whether you are rich with fiat or crypto, being rich is being rich, they are the same. Just like someone that has gold and other precious metals in their possession, they are rich if they are many, it doesn't necessarily mean that they have the fiat money. So long as the crypto could at anytime easily be converted for its value, then it will always represent well.
However, money is volatile, no one should depend on one investment because we don't know the future. I advise that whether you are having lots of fiats or crypto, try to invest them more in other things to spread the risk.
"Don't put your eggs in one basket."
However, money is volatile, no one should depend on one investment because we don't know the future. I advise that whether you are having lots of fiats or crypto, try to invest them more in other things to spread the risk.
"Don't put your eggs in one basket."
OP has a funny point of view with boredom, it's funny to bring marital love with material criteria. Perhaps people in this sense should re-examine themselves with what they are missing, without having and then searching for it until satisfied, there are other problems following.
The problem of the thought OP makes me laugh when I try to imagine that when I get married, I will see if that person has property or not . And honestly I wouldn't get married for that. There are so many problems in this life connected by very contradictory connections, I wonder if they have enough time to realize that they are actually wasting their time on such things, forever. look at material things or fame.
The problem of the thought OP makes me laugh when I try to imagine that when I get married, I will see if that person has property or not
. And honestly I wouldn't get married for that. There are so many problems in this life connected by very contradictory connections, I wonder if they have enough time to realize that they are actually wasting their time on such things, forever. look at material things or fame. 
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
This your conception is contradictory, marriage should be exceptional in this perceptions, because neither you are poor in or not if you want to marry you definitely get married, and secondly a fiat rich person and crypto rich person will still arrive in same destination when you come in terms of marital life, so either you are a billionaire or not you will still marry only if you wishes, but I don't know the aspect you are classifying it, weather its in the aspect female been rich or male been rich. And note, that not every rich person that will because of its rich and got married with thousands of women, that scope is individually perceptions and we are not meant to generalise it to anyone who are rich. So from my findings I comprehend that women and also men marry according to their choice, some people can be couples due to the source of your generated income, so it's obvious. So these, is also applicable to both side either male or female none is exempted in the aspect of choosing a partner.
In life you have to be rich of something, or nobody want to marry to you, and have build a family with you, you would be foreveralone, and the media would constantly mogging you over and over again for being foreveralone to remain you. And your mum would constantly tell you if you don't get married nobody would take care of you when your aged. Nobody would make a tomb for you, and when you died you would go to afterlife with empty stomach and would suffer straving too in the afterlife. That must be a lot of hurt! ouch!
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
So back to question. which is preferred? Married to fiat rich or crypto rich? Although crypto can be created at the comfort of your basement, also the value would plummet quickly to near zero too. Do you think in your life, you would ever see someone marry to crypto rich? btw recent news about ftx being rejected to sponsor a superstar due to it is unregistered tell me marry crypto rich might be a distance dream. Also there would be only 21m bitcoin existed, only 21m couples would be able to married rich. When there is billions of population, a lot of couples may not marry rich, due to unequal distribution, some of the crypto super rich would married hundreds of thousand more.
Jump to: