Topic: Martingale Soccer Betting System - page 2. (Read 2852 times)
I think the martingale will work in cricket betting as their are scores ups and down and team goes up and down so what like you said we can have all odds from low to high, so in this sports betting you can try martingale.
Actually using martingale strategy on sports betting is good, the problem is the odds. You need find the same odds. But i think bet on 3.00 odds is a bit risky, just find a normal odds x2.00.
if we see OP calculate these strategy have very huge profit if we win but i think bets on odds 3.00 not only just a bit risky but is too risky because sport results are unpredictable i'm afraid if someone try these strategy he will lost with big amount and i personally would not recommend martingale strategy on sport betting
Martingale is not smart IMO specially with sports, The house edge is even more with sports than in dice sites and the like, soccer is also one of the least predictable sports too..
Martingale and sports betting will not work since in sports betting we are dealing with human, example is if a team is competing with a team who is in a winning streak.
Martingale betting system is a dangerous system and martingale for soccer is not a good idea the reason is because of the odd and it take a lot of time
Basically unless you have an edge, you might as well do martingale with simple dice. Sports betting is very difficult for most.
Actually using martingale strategy on sports betting is good, the problem is the odds. You need find the same odds. But i think bet on 3.00 odds is a bit risky, just find a normal odds x2.00.
I never liked the martingale system. It is making yourself vulnerable as you betting on negative outcomes. This only costs you money than earning it winning, in the long run.
for play soccer bet with martingale you necessity really high balance (if you like bet and earn a good amount).
for the math, you can lose already all bet at odd 3 (personally, i have lose 9 consecutive bet at 1.4 but not in martingale)
for the math, you can lose already all bet at odd 3 (personally, i have lose 9 consecutive bet at 1.4 but not in martingale)
Some one made some wizardry to you, I cannot imagine let alone happen to have 9 consecutive losses at an odd 1.4 . This is the worst case I have seen so far on this forum.
You still need a big bankroll for this betting system.
I think you are right, but to be honest it could work, since sports betting is much more skill related than gambling, so I think it's a really good approach to increase your chance to profit.
You still need a big bankroll for this betting system.
Did you mess me 
We're talking about sports betting not about dice or roulette...
I work on sports betting for a long time what are you talking about has no meaning.
If you're talking about dice or roulette or same game with chance for win OK.
But we are talking here about sports betting people,
Here is forecast who will win or loss, or draw,
and everything is decided to look at the form of the team H2H how many goals will be scored etc.
You're talking about some chance, It is not in sports betting.
All you need is good info and good stats.
We're talking about sports betting not about dice or roulette...
I work on sports betting for a long time what are you talking about has no meaning.
If you're talking about dice or roulette or same game with chance for win OK.
But we are talking here about sports betting people,
Here is forecast who will win or loss, or draw,
and everything is decided to look at the form of the team H2H how many goals will be scored etc.
You're talking about some chance, It is not in sports betting.
All you need is good info and good stats.
Martingale, or any other betting system, is not particular of a type of game, like dice or roulette or whatever. Of course OP can apply the martingale strategy in sports betting. Since sports betting also require skill, and is not just about chance, if you do your research, it could actually be a very good strategy to increase your winning percentage even further. It is risky of course, because the system is risky, but if you don't usually have many losing streaks in a row, because you are a skilled punter, then it could be a good wagering system.
Did you mess me
We're talking about sports betting not about dice or roulette...
I work on sports betting for a long time what are you talking about has no meaning.
If you're talking about dice or roulette or same game with chance for win OK.
But we are talking here about sports betting people,
Here is forecast who will win or loss, or draw,
and everything is decided to look at the form of the team H2H how many goals will be scored etc.
You're talking about some chance, It is not in sports betting.
All you need is good info and good stats.
We're talking about sports betting not about dice or roulette...
I work on sports betting for a long time what are you talking about has no meaning.
If you're talking about dice or roulette or same game with chance for win OK.
But we are talking here about sports betting people,
Here is forecast who will win or loss, or draw,
and everything is decided to look at the form of the team H2H how many goals will be scored etc.
You're talking about some chance, It is not in sports betting.
All you need is good info and good stats.
Using Martingale in sportsbetting is tricky to nearly impossible not because it can't be done but because of the unfavourable odds. You need to have at least 2 odds and only bet on sports that have 2 possible endings which most American Sports are suitable for. I have seen NHL teams with odds near or above 2 which could work with Martingale if you have a huge bankroll and pick the odds wisely.
I've tried this tactic a few weeks ago. And it sure has it benefits. But there is no guarantee it will work with every game.
Which is why i switched back to my normal gambling habits (a few times a week) and that's it.
another system that is going good in italy is called "masaniello" search on google the excel sheet.
Using Martingale in sportsbetting is tricky to nearly impossible not because it can't be done but because of the unfavourable odds. You need to have at least 2 odds and only bet on sports that have 2 possible endings which most American Sports are suitable for. I have seen NHL teams with odds near or above 2 which could work with Martingale if you have a huge bankroll and pick the odds wisely.
Yes, martingale system (every lost bet 2x).
Why odds 3
example:
Odds @2 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win =160 -150= +10
Odds @3 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win=240 -150= +90
higher profits.
Why odds 3
example:
Odds @2 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win =160 -150= +10
Odds @3 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win=240 -150= +90
higher profits.
Higher profits because it's harder to win, which makes it more likely to lose all of your money.
You have a 1 out of 1,024 or 0.09765625% chance of losing 10 in a row on a 50/50 bet.
If you are choosing bets with 3 odds, you only have a 1/3 chance of winning, so your odds of losing 10 in a row go up to 1.734152%.
well what ever the odds are you can use martinagle at any odds , for me I use martingale when I bet on sports not because it works but because I love to bet on sports and I'm not that expert so when I do it I don't except to make money from doing it
the real challenge is to beat sports without martinagle , remember even when you have an edge martinagle will kill that edge if you use it
the real challenge is to beat sports without martinagle , remember even when you have an edge martinagle will kill that edge if you use it
The whole point of martingale is that the 2x your bet and the 50% chance of winning are the same (or at least close). Doubling your bet when the actual odds of winning are much lower is even stupider than regular martingale because the only reason martingale "works" is because you expect to win half of the bets. You are much more likely to run out of money or not win as much as you need to if you don't expect to win half of the bets, and you shouldn't expect to win half of the bets at 3.x odds because that isn't' how that works.
People need to stop looking at betting as winning and losing. You need to look at the odds of winning and the payout. those are much more important. That is how you tell what are good bets and what are bad ets and how you make money.
Yes, martingale system (every lost bet 2x).
Why odds 3
example:
Odds @2 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win =160 -150= +10
Odds @3 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win=240 -150= +90
higher profits.
Why odds 3
example:
Odds @2 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win =160 -150= +10
Odds @3 after 3 bet start stake 10
-10
-20
-40
80 win=240 -150= +90
higher profits.
interesting way to mix things up in the sports betting. please do update us with how things go in the future.
p.s. since you are using odd of 3, shouldn't you increase your bet amount more than 2x on losses?
p.s. since you are using odd of 3, shouldn't you increase your bet amount more than 2x on losses?
Jump to: