Pages:
Author

Topic: MATTHEW FIRED FROM BITCOIN MAGAZINE - page 2. (Read 7381 times)

legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
September 11, 2012, 01:02:03 AM
#56
Looks like the thugs in charge have stomped their little jackboots. Nice job on trashing the only voice that your little magazine had that did any good for promoting itself. Matthew is a character. Always has been, and if played true to the cards he's showing, he always will be. Anyone who took this bet seriously is a prize ass, and deserving of public humiliation. Coming on the heels of Bitscalper, Bitcoinica and pirate, it was only fitting that somebody call attention to the absolute pathetic lemming-like devotion to believing pure bullshit that has become the hallmark of bitcoin.

Hey kids? There is no free lunch. You cannot sustain 7% weekly returns. There is no economic perpetual motion money making machine that pulls bitcoins out of your ass for your amusement. Matthew's big crime was poking fun at you about it. Oh me oh my, what a terrible scoundrel he is. You have pirate raping your entire family to the tune of $5 million dollars, and you want to jump on the shit of the guy who poked a finger in your eye? Lame. You have the bitcoinica incompetents pissing in your drink and still being kowtowed to because they are going to be keynote speakers at this joke of a conference in London.

Get a fucking clue Bitcoin Community!!! Right the fuck now. All of these slick snake oil salesmen who have just invented the newest greatest thing that you should invest in are talking to you for one single reason only- to steal your funds.

Wierd to see this coming from you.  You normally take a very hard line.  Sure pirate is the bigger criminal.  I'm sure people are after him too.  But if Matthew had won, it would have been for about 1M dollars I think.  Please remember the context where Vanderoy just made a real bet 50k USD and won.  The original bet at 10k was not so out of line.

I did not bet or think he'd pay.  Regardless that does not excuse him.  We need zero tolerance for these people.  Big or small.

I want to pay suppliers in bitcoin.  How's that going to happen if they come to these forums and see this cr*p from what seems to be pivotal members of the community?




@Loup

You're something else. As if you really give a shit about if anyone lost money. Some people were using Matthew's bet to hedge and were buying pirate debt at certain prices or selling.

I may have not lost anything but to have a jackass like yourself come out and be like "look at you dumbasses wake up!" does nothing but make you look like a dumbass yourself.

Matthew lost the most by his dumb actions. You might be next if you condone that type of behavior.

Of course we all know you're just the type to sit on the sidelines and make snide comments. You've got no balls and haven't done anything but post shit on this forum using big words to make yourself sound important.

Where is your buddy BCX? Oh right because he got his ass canned by doing stupid shit too. Perhaps you want to take a step up to the plate eh?

If not, put a SOCKPUPPET in it.

Your friend,

Smoothie
  Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
September 11, 2012, 12:51:43 AM
#55
Also, for a brief moment, thought the magazine just above and to the left was titled Atlas Rising  Shocked  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
September 11, 2012, 12:49:19 AM
#54
Stopped by my local Barns & Noble today, noticed this in the magazine rack






Decided I was going to own it






Was too bright to see the camera, so i was all squinty and OMG, there's a pimple on my nose!  Cry
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 1001
-
September 10, 2012, 09:21:21 AM
#53
Bitcoin Magazine, take note. Give LoupGaroux a regular column to vent in, call it "Speaking my Bit" and sales will go up through the roof.

Noted! I always enjoyed his posts, even salvos shot in my direction.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 10, 2012, 09:16:26 AM
#52
Cool. Let me know when they announce that he has 0 stake and gains nothing from the sale & promotion of their magazine.

^This.  If he is still profiting, I'm not buying.

+1.  I did take a look at their advertising page though
http://bitcoinmagazine.net/advertise-with-us/

Why no advertising rates online?  Many papers show their rates online - there is no reason the rates should change from day to day.

Newspapers and magazines with a broad general appeal do, yes. Specialist journals like Bitcoin Magazine are a completely different beast of publication though. Most of them do not publically show their ad rates.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
September 10, 2012, 09:13:16 AM
#51
Cool. Let me know when they announce that he has 0 stake and gains nothing from the sale & promotion of their magazine.

^This.  If he is still profiting, I'm not buying.

+1.  I did take a look at their advertising page though
http://bitcoinmagazine.net/advertise-with-us/

Why no advertising rates online?  Many papers show their rates online - there is no reason the rates should change from day to day.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
September 10, 2012, 06:32:51 AM
#50
I still stand behind what I said though, I think some people are going out of their way tarnish what is likely to be a great Bitcoin conference. That is uncalled for and I'm personally very tired of it.

Except I haven't done that.  What I have repeatedly criticised is Patrick's failure to withdraw as a guest speaker and I stand by that criticism. 
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
September 10, 2012, 06:03:45 AM
#49
I agree that they probably have some responsibility over that mess and are partially to blame for it. I especially don't like their lack of communication skills regarding everything (Intersango related stuff as well). I still stand behind what I said though, I think some people are going out of their way tarnish what is likely to be a great Bitcoin conference. That is uncalled for and I'm personally very tired of it.

I agree with that. Still not a reason to use silly arguments. And anyway, I don't think it significantly harms the conference.

The conference has nothing to do with the Bitcoinica case, that case is being settled elsewhere and in other ways. I would understand the hate better if there was actually a court verdict that said Patrick is responsible. As far as I know, there IS NOT. Until there is, most of us really shouldn't put too much weight on that particular issue. The conference is about much more than Patrick.

That I disagree with. Wherever you like it or not, it has something you do with is, since some are involved in both. But I agree we should focus on personal responsibilities, and not blame the conference as a whole.
And I don't think Patrick should be blamed only if there is a court verdict saying so. Everything doesn't have to be settled in court. And I'm not sure if this matter will be.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1056
Affordable Physical Bitcoins - Denarium.com
September 10, 2012, 05:32:58 AM
#48
First bolded part is really uncalled for. Bitcoinica's problem is not about degenerate gamblers who did stupid bets.
As much as I want this conference to succeed (and it will, I'm not too worried about that), I can't agree with you on that.
At the very least Intersango team stopped all communication, release the source code (with some credentials in it), which prevented a buyout (which would have probably enabled creditors to be payed in full).
Their lack of communication also delayed the liquidation of the company. So they clearly have some responsibility in this mess.

I agree that they probably have some responsibility over that mess and are partially to blame for it. I especially don't like their lack of communication skills regarding everything (Intersango related stuff as well). I still stand behind what I said though, I think some people are going out of their way tarnish what is likely to be a great Bitcoin conference. That is uncalled for and I'm personally very tired of it.

The conference has nothing to do with the Bitcoinica case, that case is being settled elsewhere and in other ways. I would understand the hate better if there was actually a court verdict that said Patrick is responsible. As far as I know, there IS NOT. Until there is, most of us really shouldn't put too much weight on that particular issue. The conference is about much more than Patrick.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
September 10, 2012, 05:09:03 AM
#47
I'm personally happy with the announcement and will continue to support Bitcoin Magazine. I think they reacted fast and in a decisive manner. Also the speaker for the conference has been changed of course.

As far as the conference is concerned I don't get some people at all (namely repentance & LoupGaroux), they go out of their way to tarnish it at every opportunity. They probably lost speculative gambling money at Bitcoinica and now they are eternally hateful, boohoo...

The truth is that the Intersango team is helping to organize the biggest and most likely greatest Bitcoin conference thus far. It's an important gathering of like minded people. I also see it as an opportunity for the Intersango team to correct their reputation for the better, by organizing a great conference. I hope they succeed.

And Patrick, well as far as I know Patrick and Donald have been running Intersango without major issues from day 1 and still continue to run it. The whole Bitcoinica case is still unresolved, it's very much unclear who was truly responsible and who fucked up.

I've had my own doubts about the team, our site discontinued using Intersango a while ago just to be safe and we're still not using it. We do want to use Intersango and based on our experience at the conference we might re-evaluate this decision.

First bolded part is really uncalled for. Bitcoinica's problem is not about degenerate gamblers who did stupid bets.
As much as I want this conference to succeed (and it will, I'm not too worried about that), I can't agree with you on that.
At the very least Intersango team stopped all communication, release the source code (with some credentials in it), which prevented a buyout (which would have probably enabled creditors to be payed in full).
Their lack of communication also delayed the liquidation of the company. So they clearly have some responsibility in this mess.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
September 10, 2012, 04:46:53 AM
#46
Looks like the thugs in charge have stomped their little jackboots. Nice job on trashing the only voice that your little magazine had that did any good for promoting itself. Matthew is a character. Always has been, and if played true to the cards he's showing, he always will be. Anyone who took this bet seriously is a prize ass, and deserving of public humiliation. Coming on the heels of Bitscalper, Bitcoinica and pirate, it was only fitting that somebody call attention to the absolute pathetic lemming-like devotion to believing pure bullshit that has become the hallmark of bitcoin.

Hey kids? There is no free lunch. You cannot sustain 7% weekly returns. There is no economic perpetual motion money making machine that pulls bitcoins out of your ass for your amusement. Matthew's big crime was poking fun at you about it. Oh me oh my, what a terrible scoundrel he is. You have pirate raping your entire family to the tune of $5 million dollars, and you want to jump on the shit of the guy who poked a finger in your eye? Lame. You have the bitcoinica incompetents pissing in your drink and still being kowtowed to because they are going to be keynote speakers at this joke of a conference in London.

Get a fucking clue Bitcoin Community!!! Right the fuck now. All of these slick snake oil salesmen who have just invented the newest greatest thing that you should invest in are talking to you for one single reason only- to steal your funds. There is no altruistic tooth fairy that wants to make you rich, they all just want to make themselves rich. And you are the laziest, saddest bunch of fuck-toys I have ever seen. Somebody just fleeced your ass out of 500,000 bitcoins and your anger is directed towards the guy mocking you about it.

Stop thinking that bitcoin is some wunderkind techno anarchy tool that is going to change the definition of money. It is a slightly interesting alternate way to transact a very, very limited subset of transactions pretty much limited to the technically savvy. Unfortunately, it seems as if one of the first things that happens when you download the block chain is that you put your common sense on hold.

Oh, and Bitcoin Magazine? I ordered copies of the first three issues 6 weeks ago. Bought and paid for with PayPal. Where the fuck are they? Maybe a little more attention to fulfillment and a little less ass-kissing to the the gods of public opinion. You are starting to act like a couple of other well known fuck-ups of recent note in that your attention is on your ego, and not on your business model. Quit playing games and do your jobs.


I agree with this. It would seem that most of the moping, groaning and whining are a result of "oh, I can't actually hedge my bet against being cheated(pirateat40'ed)? Now I feel even dumber than I did when I actually got cheated. I R ANGRY FOR BEING MADE TO LOOK LIKE A FOOL, TWICE!!@$&%"
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1056
Affordable Physical Bitcoins - Denarium.com
September 10, 2012, 04:41:31 AM
#45
By the way, based on Matthew's own letter (which feels sincere) he is exiting the company entirely, equity wise as well.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1176882
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1056
Affordable Physical Bitcoins - Denarium.com
September 10, 2012, 04:29:31 AM
#44
I'm personally happy with the announcement and will continue to support Bitcoin Magazine. I think they reacted fast and in a decisive manner. Also the speaker for the conference has been changed of course.

As far as the conference is concerned I don't get some people at all (namely repentance & LoupGaroux), they go out of their way to tarnish it at every opportunity. They probably lost speculative gambling money at Bitcoinica and now they are eternally hateful, boohoo...

The truth is that the Intersango team is helping to organize the biggest and most likely greatest Bitcoin conference thus far. It's an important gathering of like minded people. I also see it as an opportunity for the Intersango team to correct their reputation for the better, by organizing a great conference. I hope they succeed.

And Patrick, well as far as I know Patrick and Donald have been running Intersango without major issues from day 1 and still continue to run it. The whole Bitcoinica case is still unresolved, it's very much unclear who was truly responsible and who fucked up.

I've had my own doubts about the team, our site discontinued using Intersango a while ago just to be safe and we're still not using it. We do want to use Intersango and based on our experience at the conference we might re-evaluate this decision.
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
September 10, 2012, 04:19:00 AM
#43

Hi all,

sorry guys for asking, I'm not a frequent reader here lately. What is wrong with the magazine or with Mat that I didn't see or know ?

Thanks,,,

He's a scammer.

You can pick it up from here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101751.900
member
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
September 10, 2012, 04:11:19 AM
#42

Hi all,

sorry guys for asking, I'm not a frequent reader here lately. What is wrong with the magazine or with Mat that I didn't see or know ?

Thanks,,,
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 10, 2012, 03:57:12 AM
#41
Bitcoin Magazine, take note. Give LoupGaroux a regular column to vent in, call it "Speaking my Bit" and sales will go up through the roof.
donator
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
September 10, 2012, 03:34:53 AM
#40
Not enough determination. He could keep stake even secretly when they "announce" the opposite.  Suspect.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
September 10, 2012, 03:29:03 AM
#39
I was under the impression that GPUMax was owned and operated solely by pirate, and thus GPUMax = BTCS&T in a way. Is that wrong?

Corporation Wiki lists two other active members of GPUMax Technologies LLC apart from pirate.

http://www.corporationwiki.com/Unknown/Unknown/gpumax-technologies-llc/101278778.aspx
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
September 10, 2012, 03:20:13 AM
#38
I was under the impression that GPUMax was owned and operated solely by pirate, and thus GPUMax = BTCS&T in a way. Is that wrong?
That's what I thought, too.
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035
September 10, 2012, 03:13:38 AM
#37
I was under the impression that GPUMax was owned and operated solely by pirate, and thus GPUMax = BTCS&T in a way. Is that wrong?
Pages:
Jump to: