Author

Topic: Matthew N. Wright - Has he lost forever? (Read 368 times)

newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
July 07, 2019, 06:52:31 PM
#6
I believe he is banned from even accessing the forum.

I really tried to look for his social presence but unfortunately even his YT channel is down too. I wonder where is this guy in the real world. He really had (has) things to share.

Apparently, he was the founder and CEO of Bitcoin Magazine and bittalk.tv in 2011 and a 0.5ETH... now 1ETH reward and it will keep increasing until he is found for Ethereum Un #Devcon5 keynote on the 8th October Osaka.  https://beta.cent.co/+rgvsqw there is even a youtube talk: https://youtu.be/riYt2qVHTKM
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
March 02, 2018, 04:43:37 PM
#5
...but thats because moderators have deleted all of the disruptive posts already, leaving behind only a person's quality posts.

*edit* 10,000 BTC bet that he didn't make good on is what earned him the untrustworthy tag. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/im-giving-100-roi-away-to-anyone-who-thinks-pirate-is-a-fraud-101751

It make sense now. Seems like he was someone really hard to control. Deleting all of the disruptive posts did not came in my mind at the first place.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2156
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
February 27, 2018, 06:32:28 PM
#4
At the time, there was a Scammer tag given out to any users that had a valid scam report against them by Theymos. This was given to Matthew because he didn't honor a massive bet if I recall correctly, and it was later changed to untrustworthy when they settled? Again its been a while and I'm trying to recall this just based on memory, so that might not be exactly correct. There aren't set custom titles. Moderators and people who donated to the forums were able to set their own custom titles.

As far as banning went a long time ago, most people weren't banned for spamming, they were banned for their own goods because they'd become obsessive about things to the point where we'd give bans to give people a break from it. Again if I'm not mistaken, MNW was the same.

Something to consider when you are looking at the posts of someone who was banned, or in modern times more commonly for spamming, their posts may look great to you, but thats because moderators have deleted all of the disruptive posts already, leaving behind only a person's quality posts.

*edit* 10,000 BTC bet that he didn't make good on is what earned him the untrustworthy tag. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/im-giving-100-roi-away-to-anyone-who-thinks-pirate-is-a-fraud-101751
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
February 27, 2018, 06:20:10 PM
#3
I believe he is banned from even accessing the forum.

I really tried to look for his social presence but unfortunately even his YT channel is down too. I wonder where is this guy in the real world. He really had (has) things to share.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
February 26, 2018, 12:39:52 PM
#2
I believe he is banned from even accessing the forum.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
February 26, 2018, 12:12:37 PM
#1
I was going through a really old post earlier. You all read it 100s times I guess. No big deal however, if you have not yet then I suggest you do. This post explains things are related to raking up your membership. Now a days we are some much concentrating on Merit that I am sure a lot of members especially newbies does not even know about other stuffs required to rank up.

Anyway, I was going through the comments. Since the original post was created on June 19, 2013 by theymos of-course, I was curious to see what is going on (present time) with the members who were active on that time. So I was really reading the old replies on the first few pages only. No doubt all these members are now Hero Member and Legendary. These same members with HUGE reputation were newbies, Jr.Member or Member like us once. I was fascinating, thinking 5 years from now someone like me will read my contents (if BCT exists of-course), I may exist or not that time.

In first few pages I really did not find anything special from all these comments. It's the same shit. Whenever you will bring something new you will see there are always two groups. One agree and one disagree. The agree group will tell you all the good things about why they agree and the other group will do the same but opposite to establish their own philosophy. It's in our genes. Oh yes, there are other group as well who will be always confuse about which side to take.

Suddenly my eyes caught up on these custom titles. "can into space", "aka snapsunny", Untrustworthy etc. I am not sure how many this kind of interesting custom titles do we have. I will appreciate, If you can help me providing any link to any post related to custom title (Thanks in advance). I just want to know all the titles we have here.

When I saw the title Untrustworthy but with the rank of Hero Member, Activity: 588, Merit: 500, Posts: 6512, I stopped and wanted to see who is this user. I went to his profile and then went to his "last posts of this person" to figure out if he is still an active member or not. The last post he made was on August 13, 2013, 11:42:56 AM


Matthew N. Wright is a Hero member. The user was a genius in my opinion. He knew that things were not working for him on this forum. His last few lines were
If you choose to trust someone elses broadcast, then you are agreeing to listen to their ramblings (reverse ignore).
Quote
If you choose to trust someone for transactions, you are choosing to increase their reputation based on your reputation.
Quote
Nothing gets shoved in without notice by a moderator who invested into someone. No one gets secretly "whitelisted".
- These are some really big bold statements and really valid points.

I really did not have the luck to know the guy but after reading few of his posts what I realised was... He wanted to make this forum a better place, a place without depending on others' trust (i guess), a decentralised place I really think.

Quote
It needs to be tested and tried, but ask yourself the same question about the bitcoin blockchain. If there were something "illegal" there, how would it be "removed"? It doesn't need to, just ignored, which is the default action. When it comes to data and encryption, when no one can see it, it effectively doesn't exist. Since the server would hold no encrypted keys, complying with any and all demands of local law enforcement (hint: not a US hosted site) would still not help them do anything about the content.

Should I say the forum is unfortunate or the guy himself is unfortunate or we are unfortunate?  Roll Eyes

I think we are fortunate that the forum still exists. Thanks to theymos and others who are giving their everything to make it a better place.


(Disclaimer: I could be really wrong about everything about him, I tried to find him on any other social media or on youtube but all the links those I went through were outdated)
Jump to: