The same could be applied to what you just said. Just because a thread discusses "philosophical shortcomings of Bitcoin" does not mean that the argument is the same. If you'd research the argument I made, I can guarantee that you wouldn't find another one like it.
I wasn't talking about you personally, but tried to explain why the community responds as it does.
I have no opinion on whether you are a troll or not as I don't follow stuff like that. I am not interested in philosophical debate at all, I think what this community needs is more practical people that build stuff, not debate.
Well, to some extent I agree. My most recent posts have been focused on the need for Bitcoin infrastructure growth. But, at the same time, I think intelligent debate is important. Less debate leads to less critical thinking and questioning about Bitcoin and Bitcoin-related sites. If newbies get shut down when they try to bring up legitimate points (the number of times these points have been discussed is irrelevant to whether or not these points are valid) then they are more likely to blindly accept generalized ideas about Bitcoin like, "Bitcoin is just better! So...that means safer!" And that can lead to more people getting scammed.
How many people were called trolls because they kept bringing up security-related issues post-Mt. Gox? How many people were screamed at because they happened to start another MyBitcoin thread? There are literally thousands of threads on this forum and to expect that every individual will know that there is a specific thread dedicated to a particular issue is ludicrous. You're going to be hearing about the Mt. Gox crash and the MyBitcoin debacle years from now from newbies who continue to join. And then what? Are the completely-awesome elite members going to continue to berate these people from brining up legitimate concerns?
And, more generally, debate about Bitcoin as a currency in general is healthy. You aren't interested in it because that is not your interest. Bitcoin is surrounded by complex issues and to think that anybody on here has the whole damn thing figured out is nuts. In my opinion, for example, Bitcoin is clearly a get-rich-quick scheme for Satoshi. That much is obvious. Whether or not his motives also encompassed something virtuous and whether or not Bitcoin is a good thing independent of his motives is something entirely different.
For example, doesn't Bitcoin inherently cater to the already-wealthy and marginalize the poor even further were it to become widely adopted? In my opinion, yes. OK, so, that is now a point of debate, and it's a point relevant to site construction. How do we build sites that take into account as many of these philosophical issues as possible and implement means to address them? Debate simply helps to identify areas of general concern, and intelligent merchants will recognize these concerns and implement ways to help alleviate these concerns in their site construction. The more citizens use Bitcoin, the more concerns there will be, and vendors will need to keep listening if they want to increase their customer base.