Topic: mdayonliner - Are you the new owner of this account? (Read 1470 times)

Just kidding. Nothing personal.

Retina's broken english seems to be done objectively. He writes better english sometimes.

Coolcryptovator - thanks for background will take a look.

Yes, most likely you are missing few thread. It would be help you to understand full story.
1. You think I am a scammer? mdayonliner's reputation
2. S_Therapist = mdayonliner
3. [Evidences]S_Therapist can not be mdayonliner.

Take your time to read it. For your information, no one tagged yet for Alt account. Read these three thread then you will get point why they got tag.

---

To be honest, really I was tried avoid reply on this thread but eventually I failed to control myself. I really don't like to use bad language and don't like to hear any bad language from others as well. If I reply constructive answer then mdayonliner will think I am attacking him. However this thread really diverted another way. Honestly I don't see any point of this thread why mdayonliner opened it. I missed both of your post from main topic, most likely both of your discussion has been deleted. Your main fact is,Really it was necessary to present like this?

My main point is you have lack of patience and you always tried to prove yourself right and tried to prove taggers wrong. Obviously you can defend your self, but you have to accept what was wrong. You had not chosen way of apology and you had chosen way to prove yourself right. Your criticism is changed peoples mind.

Honestly I thought perhaps hilariousandco will reconsider his feedback after few days. I guess hilariousandco also thought same like. If I am not wrong your criticism and wrong argument force hilariousandco to change his mind. You made more argument and criticism instead of wait with patience and write with apology.

However seems marlboroza revise his feedback. But I don't think you need explain everywhere your tag is wrong. That means you always tried to prove you right. If you continue this kind of behavior then I don't think any DT will reconsider their feedback.

Apologize for broken English.  

---

I am not aware about you before made this thread. I just want to say, your English is better than me. And you are trying your best to write broken English especially on this thread. Somehow you are alt of someone in my opinion.

Not involved in? actions of DT and mods concern the entire board. They have wide implications and can set precedents.

Derailing by asking direct questions relating to the OP? haha

Please stop stalking me if you care so little for me haha

Imagine the attention that you pay the people who you do care about .... lol

Well, I'm glad it was at least good for you - I didn't feel a thing. And stop derailing threads you're not involved in.

Don't refer to the pharmacist in that way. He said he's heard others call it cardboard "city" ..towns are too provincial

Just keep on topic and answer the questions in your own words if you like or don't. I don't like people twisting out of things on their "interpretation" of someone elses  "explanation".

So take it slow, and answer my questions in your own words or just keep insisting you're smart whilst there are multiple instances of you being destroyed by me in debate all over the forum. I actually like using your quotes to strengthen my own statements now. You have been useful so far. thanks. I miss you actually. Although that's not to say fox pup is not a worthy replacement. Brings back great memories of having you both at the same time.....nom nom nom

I see only HandC red feedback. I (as yet) have not excluded him since although he may directly support proven scumbags on to DT there may be an unknown reason that as yet I am not privy to. I am far less happy about him supporting imbeciles accusing me of making stupid posts (by applying 10 merits) that will not present even one example they care to debate. However, I still want to give admins the benefit of the doubt else this board is clearly fucked.

Now, I have heard there is something you can add to the end of the url to see the page as if you include DT on your trust list. What is that now?

Even then a full explanation is better than a snippet in those little boxes.

If those red trusting do not wish to offer their full side of it then fair enough.  I find those that are not willing to discuss things often lack confidence in their decisions.

Perhaps the accused can shine some clarity on their apparent crimes.

I see someone doxxed poor old MDOL. Perhaps some different snaps for the escrow services website might be in order.

It is normal for the elderly to accept the head of the children to get it, There is no other way than to accept whatever you do.

Well we'll have to agree to disagree. All we have is one word against the other.


What bad things? You're starting to sound like mday again.


There's nothing wrong with being born in Bangladesh. That's just one other thing you two have in common.


I'm not angry and I didn't say you were all bad.


Not sure why this is relevant.


Maybe one day I will. Maybe I can lodge with mday  .


There is no concrete proof or smoking gun, but it's a theory based on multiple pieces of evidence or coincidences. People can make their own mind up on whether they are the same or not.


As suchmoon said, read their feedbacks.

Don't anyone dare to tell the Village Idiot that the red trust thingy is clickable and shows what the trust is for. No fun in that.

I can not say anything beyond your decision because you are in charge of caring for it, But what you think I'm not that person. You have the power to do some good or bad things here,I think it is a sin to get born in Bangladesh It sounds like I hear it Someone in our country has misbehaved with you It is not okay to think that everyone in our country has done bad things to you... You do not know why you are angry over us But not all the people of our country are bad.
I work bidyanondo foundation https://bidyanondo.org/ and "One Taka Meal" (1taka=0.012USD) program please one day visit in our country and see our workshop, We work with poor children.

This is a very confusing thread.

Even if these 3 people are just one person (which seems like speculation with no proof) what is the reason they are getting red trust?

I don't even like this mdayonline nor s_therpist both are snivelling ass kissers IMHO just obviously trying to take the fastest route up the sig spam ladder . So is talkstar and so is ANY noob hanging around meta. You don't join a board to take immediate and almost sole interest in the mechanisms the board operates upon. It is completely ludicrous to care about that before you have some skin in the game. They would usually only ever turn up there if they were hacked or appealing some admin abuse/mistake.

But what are their crimes that warrant specifically this red trust?

Is there something I am missing in this instance? if so fill me in?

Working from the assumption they are DIFFERENT people... what have they done that warrants red trust?

Working from the assumption they are same person ...what have they done that warrants red trust?

Seems like a lot of fuss over nothing.

Well you kind of need one to have the other here, but I think money is a big part of it. His whole bread and butter before this forum seems to have been promoting ponzis to people (and it probably still is to be honest). That says a lot about him, but maybe he wanted to go legit. Earning money via sigs is much easier than trying to flog ponzis to greedy idiots who just want to get rich quick (though you can do both). Money from a campaign like Chipmixer is probably a decent wage in his country and I'm sure he'd rather earn from that than do dodgy shit. This forum is potentially a huge source of income for people so its in many's interest to have a high-ranking account in good standing. The more reputable you are here the more job opportunities naturally come your way and the more money you're entrusted with, but when you get negative feedback that usually throws a spanner in the works.


What were you randomly checking that for?


Nobody is going to buy this and I don't believe you're not an alt of someone or that you two don't know each other. If mday "knows" s_therapist then he almost certainly knows of you too. He's probably learned not to admit that though.

when go to my trust summery so show the details.




i am new in this forum but a lot of time invest for the reading topic than I start the post, I do not know, but you think I'm mistaken.
see my activity.



when mdayonliner give me 6 merit so I tried to talk to her But he did not answer.


https://imgur.com/J5ciQxY

I was wondering that myself, along with how he's apparently familiar with the other two's posting style and country of origin, etc.  And yeah, for someone motivated enough it's pretty damn easy to write in a different style to try to make it look like a different person.  Plus we know mdayonliner has a motive behind trying to conceal his true identity.  All of that in addition to the other evidence should convince anyone skeptical about what's going on here.

That's always been my impression as well, and I don't think he's driven just by money.  He's motivated by a need for respect and validation, which is paradoxically why he's so vocal about telling you it doesn't matter if you don't trust him.  Starting fresh with a new account gives him another shot at a clean record--except his little quirks in writing tend to give him away each time and won't let him achieve that.

How did you find this thread? How did you know I was a mod? Busted! If you're not an alt of mdayonliner or S_Therapist then who are you an alt of? You're clearly not a brand new user here as you had knowledge of lauda and forum drama from only your second post.

In my opinion, you personally seem to have two very different types of writing. One is quite broken and then the next you have no issues at all (especially when you're seemingly trying to get that merit), and I suspect you're doing this just to try make yourselves look different so you have something to point to to explain away the other similarities, but when there are numerous other fairly unique similarities it's hard to ignore. In my first post here there are several things that tie you together. Then there was the things others brought up like capitalising the A in Advance and you also reappear to comment on lauda the day he leaves negative on S_therapist. mdayonliner then merits you the exact amount of merits you need to rank up and you then immediately join a campaign whilst he disappears. Too fishy to me.

Hi,
dear moderator, i don't know  mdayonliner and S_Therapist And I have no personal relationship with them, Although we are in the same country, I do not know them It's just a coincidence that we live in the country now. Please see them and my type of writing They might be great in English but I can not, I write more about software and hardware but they do not write about it, And they did not get it because of not having English in the way they got Merit for the good English. My posts and their posts are not the same but we are born bangladesh, So the language between us is a bit different.

That's very nicely spotted and is obviously another huge coincidence. One that is very hard to ignore.


I think he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't at this point. We all know he's lying about certain things but I don't think he's going to admit that. I'd like him to come clean or clarify certain things but I doubt he will, especially if it makes any of my accusations right. I don't think he should abandon his account either. Having a couple of negative feedbacks isn't the be all and end all of the account here, especially since he hasn't got any that make him out to be a terrible scammer or anything. In fact, he's still on signature campaigns on both of the accounts so you can clearly still earn here as well. I think the problem is he wants to be one of the big players on one of the big boy campaigns and for that you need a pretty impeccable record both in merit and post quality and I think it's why he's desperate to start afresh, but I think it's going to be fairly easy to spot him time and time again. I think his biggest mistake was "admitting" he knew s_therapist in real life, which I think he just came up with on the spur of the moment to try explain away the similarities (which obviously nobody is buying). Maybe there's possibly even a glimmer of truth to it though and the account technically isn't his but he's made content for it to post in order to gain merits and hence why it walks, talks and acts like him in multiple ways (which for the record I don't believe). I did actually ask him if he's ever made content for that account but he never answered, probably because it would contradict him not knowing about it in the first place.


It looks like he's gone full throttle trying to grab as much merit as he can the last couple of days:




I'm sure he'll be back anyway. mdayonliner said the same thing before when he abandoned the account and then s-therapist myseriously took over.

Bingo. mdayonliner and S_Therapist have gone quiet, both red-trusted. Retina is ranked up and ready to go.

I tried for as long as I could to give mdayonliner the benefit of the doubt...but now there's no doubt remaining in my mind that there's some seriously pervasive dishonesty here, and the last straw is the last batch of evidence that hilariousandco presented (good to see you back, btw).  The evidence that mdayonliner is denying is so strong that such denials only paint him as a liar--and that's unfortunate.  I've always thought that maybe he was too ambitious for his own good, trying to get merits, rank up, and establish himself here more quickly than most folks do.  I figured the $100k escrow offer was part of that, but now I'm really starting to wonder about that.  Luckily it didn't happen and we'll never know what the outcome would have been.

Sorry, mdayonliner.  You've been busted and it's too obvious to ignore this time.  Though I don't think you're going to be able to polish your tarnished reputation--at least in the eyes of a lot of members--but your best bet would be to at least come clean.  It certainly couldn't hurt, and the continued denial just looks foolish.

7.5+ billion people in the world.

What are the odds that few random strangers will find 2 RL friends in internet forum based on nothing but posting style in part of forum which is about forum?   

Well, that doesn't look natural. There are also bold links and bold words in other posts. Something is in this post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49373740, one account activates after another becomes inactive. Then, active account gets negative:



...and Retina activates at the same day posting this:




That is just coincidence because negative came few hours after that post. Funny timing.