What if we test you first? People find the symptoms of some non-obscure medical issue online (or from memory, or some free trials), add in some history, then ask you for an advice/diagnosis.
Methinks you underestimate the benefits of medical school.
This sounds like a great idea.
Lol . Thanks for the backup eroxors - I hope I didn't waste 1/4 million dollars and 12 years of my life to loose to LMGTFY. I wasn't number one in my class but I can say with confidence google is useless for the majority of people as far as self diagnosis. For information on disease states it's great - but it's not a clinician. It's not like you can google "loud thump car turning" and know what's going on with your car. The human body is 100x more complex than car - you're in biomed and you should know that. Google is a great tool and I use it everyday, but it's only a tool. If you gave a Digital Multimeter to a chef they would be like WTF. Now google would be able to spit out more info than I ever could about any 1 topic, but google wasn't forced to rectals on every admission while on call during it's intern year (or at least I hope not).
Godspeed to you if you can be helpful. I would encourage more public diagnosis/advice as long as it isn't embarrassing to the patient. I always wished there was some way to quantify general practitioner success rate. I mean you should be transparent and publish your success, false positive, and false negative rates. Obviously this is more complicated than it sounds due to difficulty in determining the end of treatment. It would be awesome to make an attempt at it though. If you develop a scoring system that works well it could be adopted world wide. There is a need for this type of thing.