Megaminer 6.3 - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher - page 21.

sconklinbtc

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

As I went back to the logs, it appears I was wrong, the 5.0 didn't benchmark LYRA2v2 correctly with ccminerPolytmos. Maybe both groups got stuck on the same port? There is no way a GTX 960 was hashing at the same rate as a 1080, and this happened both times I ran the benchmark.

Code:

Next Interval:  0 secs...
------------------------------------------------   MegaMiner 5.0  -----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (E)nd Interval   (P)rofits    (C)urrent    (H)istory    (W)allets                       |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GroupName     Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner             Pool  Location PoolWorkers
---------     ----- ------- ------- --------- ---- -----             ----  -------- -----------
1080      51.8 mh/s 0.00066   10.67 LYRA2V2        N-CcminerPolytmos ZPOOL US       2204
960       51.8 mh/s 0.00066   10.67 LYRA2V2        N-CcminerPolytmos ZPOOL US       2204


Next Interval:  199 secs...
------------------------------------------------   MegaMiner 5.0  -----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (E)nd Interval   (P)rofits    (C)urrent    (H)istory    (W)allets                       |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GroupName    Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner            Pool  Location PoolWorkers
---------    ----- ------- ------- --------- ---- -----            ----  -------- -----------
1080      0.0 ph/s 0.00000    0.00 LYRA2V2        N-CcminerNanashi ZPOOL US       1903
960       0.0 ph/s 0.00000    0.00 LYRA2V2        N-CcminerNanashi ZPOOL US       1903


----------------------------------------------------PROFITS------------------------------------------------------------
(B)est Miners/All       (T)op 12/All


   GroupName: 960

Algorithm Coin Miner              Speed        BTC/Day USD/Day PoolFee MinerFee Pool  Location
--------- ---- -----              -----        ------- ------- ------- -------- ----  --------
KECCAK         N-CcminerKlaust    Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%          ZPOOL US
LBRY           N-ccminerAlexisHSR Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
KECCAK         N-CcminerPolytmos  Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%          ZPOOL US
EQUIHASH       N-Dtsm             Benchmarking -------    0.00   1.75%    2.00% ZPOOL US
LYRA2V2        N-CcminerNanashi   Benchmarking -------    0.00   1.75%          ZPOOL US
LBRY           N-CcminerPolytmos  Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%          ZPOOL US
EQUIHASH       N-EWBF             Benchmarking -------    0.00   1.75%    0.00% ZPOOL US
LBRY           N-ccminerAlexis    Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
KECCAK         N-ccminerAlexisHSR Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
LYRA2V2        N-CcminerPolytmos  49.2 mh/s    0.00062   10.05   1.75%          ZPOOL US
NIST5          N-CcminerPolytmos  53.6 mh/s    0.00040    6.60   2.00%          ZPOOL US
X17            N-ccminerPalgin    4.0 mh/s     0.00018    2.86   2.00%          ZPOOL US
PHI            N-CcminerTpruvot   6.8 mh/s     0.00011    1.74   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
XEVAN          N-CcminerXevan     1.2 mh/s     0.00009    1.44   2.00%          ZPOOL US
NEOSCRYPT      N-CcminerKlaust    328.2 kh/s   0.00008    1.26   2.00%          ZPOOL US


   GroupName: 1080

Algorithm Coin Miner              Speed        BTC/Day USD/Day PoolFee MinerFee Pool  Location
--------- ---- -----              -----        ------- ------- ------- -------- ----  --------
KECCAK         N-CcminerKlaust    Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%          ZPOOL US
LBRY           N-ccminerAlexisHSR Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
LBRY           N-ccminerAlexis    Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
EQUIHASH       N-Dtsm             Benchmarking -------    0.00   1.75%    2.00% ZPOOL US
LYRA2V2        N-CcminerNanashi   Benchmarking -------    0.00   1.75%          ZPOOL US
LBRY           N-CcminerPolytmos  Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%          ZPOOL US
EQUIHASH       N-EWBF             Benchmarking -------    0.00   1.75%    0.00% ZPOOL US
KECCAK         N-CcminerPolytmos  Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%          ZPOOL US
KECCAK         N-ccminerAlexisHSR Benchmarking -------    0.00   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
LYRA2V2        N-CcminerPolytmos  49.2 mh/s    0.00062   10.05   1.75%          ZPOOL US
X17            N-ccminerPalgin    13.3 mh/s    0.00059    9.55   2.00%          ZPOOL US
NIST5          N-CcminerPolytmos  53.6 mh/s    0.00040    6.60   2.00%          ZPOOL US
PHI            N-CcminerTpruvot   22.6 mh/s    0.00035    5.78   2.00%    0.00% ZPOOL US
XEVAN          N-CcminerXevan     3.9 mh/s     0.00028    4.48   2.00%          ZPOOL US
NEOSCRYPT      N-CcminerKlaust    1.0 mh/s     0.00024    3.86   2.00%          ZPOOL US

dudel42

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: dudel42 on December 20, 2017, 12:01:00 PM

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:17:36 AM

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

just checked, and I seem to have the same problem..

both ccMinerAlexisHSR and ccminerPolytmos seem to report 30-50% more LYRA2V2 hashrate than the pool reports. this is on a clean 5.0 release install.

I'm sure there is a better real fix for this, but in the meantime if reduced all the numbers in the stats folder for the 4 lyra2v2 miners by half -- it was always stuck on that algo before.

tutulfo

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 105

Quote from: sconklinbtc on December 20, 2017, 10:49:04 AM

Quote from: Sinuhet on December 20, 2017, 10:41:02 AM

What is "correct" way to end this program? I use ctrl-C and after this i kill running miners.

And some suggestion. This script is for windows, but when I open config in notepad, there are "nonwindows" ends of lines.

I find if you simply just close the window, it closes the miners and everything for you.

Easy, close main program.

Txt format is due to program and character set used.

tutulfo

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 105

Quote from: christ007 on December 20, 2017, 11:27:55 AM

Quote from: jbonifacio on December 15, 2017, 05:31:00 PM

Quote from: christ007 on December 15, 2017, 05:12:22 PM

Quote from: cashen on December 14, 2017, 11:23:00 PM

Quote from: christ007 on December 14, 2017, 03:46:06 PM

I'm the only one who's CCminer crash on benchmark ?

what does it do?

https://www.evernote.com/l/ABjcLTCVjxRAxKVAumrSl-jFtgx4ewIE27g
CCminer crash

Set memory overclock to 0

That's what resolved my ccminer memory crash issues.

I do not overclock in MSI Afterburner. Or it's in magaminer files I need to set it ?

We are talking about overclock in MSI Afterburner

tutulfo

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 105

Quote from: robl450 on December 20, 2017, 06:54:00 AM

Quote from: tutulfo on December 20, 2017, 04:05:25 AM

Quote from: robl450 on December 19, 2017, 08:30:35 PM

potentially I could add the algorithms but there are some that work on one miner and not the other. I can manually go and delete miners and such which I did for one or two, but then it becomes a hassle every time you upgrade versions.

Big problem now is I really want to use MPH but also use the 24 hour profit as it works much better than it switching every whatever minutes to a new algorithm.

MPH hasn´t 24h statistics, only thing you can do is use 24h statistics from Whattomine.

There is a pool called whattomine virtual, it can use any other pool to mine but based on WTM statistics. Default pool order now is: MPH, Suprnova, Yiimp. Search coin in first pool if not find seach second, etc. If you only want to mine on MPH edit this code and delete other pools lines

   switch ($PoolOrder)
   {
   "1"{$PoolToSearch='MINING_POOL_HUB'}
   "2"{$PoolToSearch='Suprnova'}
   "3"{$PoolToSearch='YIIMP'}

   }

I have been loading with start.bat. pick automatic and all options are there, pick automatic 24 hour and MPH is not included there. Are you saying just pick What to mine instead? I want to mine on ahashpool, zpool, hashrefinery and MPH.

COPY Whattomine pool file as MPH24h for example, edit and delete lines "2"... and "3".... with this you have a new pool called MPH24h that use Mining Pool Hub servers but profit calculation is taken from Whattomine. In your batch file you can use this new pool as one more, for example

- poolsname ahashpool,zpool,hashrefinery,MPH24h

dudel42

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:17:36 AM

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

just checked, and I seem to have the same problem..

both ccMinerAlexisHSR and ccminerPolytmos seem to report 30-50% more LYRA2V2 hashrate than the pool reports. this is on a clean 5.0 release install.

newmz

sr. member

Activity: 372

Merit: 250

The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:17:36 AM

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

If you use the DJM version of ccminer for Lyra2v2 you will get the correct hashrate reported at your machine and at the pool. I has a feature that has something to do with reporting (or not reporting - can't remember which) stale shares. I have used it for Miningpoolhub and on my own vertcoin P2Pool node and the hashrate matches locally and at the pool.

christ007

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: jbonifacio on December 15, 2017, 05:31:00 PM

Quote from: christ007 on December 15, 2017, 05:12:22 PM

Quote from: cashen on December 14, 2017, 11:23:00 PM

Quote from: christ007 on December 14, 2017, 03:46:06 PM

I'm the only one who's CCminer crash on benchmark ?

what does it do?

https://www.evernote.com/l/ABjcLTCVjxRAxKVAumrSl-jFtgx4ewIE27g
CCminer crash

Set memory overclock to 0

That's what resolved my ccminer memory crash issues.

I do not overclock in MSI Afterburner. Or it's in magaminer files I need to set it ?

sconklinbtc

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: Sinuhet on December 20, 2017, 10:41:02 AM

What is "correct" way to end this program? I use ctrl-C and after this i kill running miners.

And some suggestion. This script is for windows, but when I open config in notepad, there are "nonwindows" ends of lines.

I find if you simply just close the window, it closes the miners and everything for you.

Sinuhet

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

What is "correct" way to end this program? I use ctrl-C and after this i kill running miners.

And some suggestion. This script is for windows, but when I open config in notepad, there are "nonwindows" ends of lines.

sconklinbtc

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:43:40 AM

Quote from: sconklinbtc on December 20, 2017, 09:23:36 AM

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:17:36 AM

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

Weird, mine typically reports at the pool about what my miner is telling me it is. Mine say 55mh/s and typically reports between 45 and 65 (sometimes even higher in periods of good luck) at the pool.

What miner do you use? Excavator is the highest at the benchmarks but the real hashrate is much lower.

Excavator isn't my highest in benchmarks, it's one of the ccminers for me, I believe, but I don't remember which. I'll have to check when I'm at home after work.

nitrobg

member

Activity: 413

Merit: 17

Quote from: sconklinbtc on December 20, 2017, 09:23:36 AM

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:17:36 AM

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

Weird, mine typically reports at the pool about what my miner is telling me it is. Mine say 55mh/s and typically reports between 45 and 65 (sometimes even higher in periods of good luck) at the pool.

What miner do you use? Excavator is the highest at the benchmarks but the real hashrate is much lower.

sconklinbtc

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

Quote from: nitrobg on December 20, 2017, 09:17:36 AM

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

Weird, mine typically reports at the pool about what my miner is telling me it is. Mine say 55mh/s and typically reports between 45 and 65 (sometimes even higher in periods of good luck) at the pool.

nitrobg

member

Activity: 413

Merit: 17

Lyra2v2 is problematic for nvidia, the miner itself reports 30% higher hashrate than actual. Perhaps you should add a penalty for the algorithm on nvidia or check what miner gives a real hashrate.

sconklinbtc

newbie

Activity: 29

Merit: 0

I'll add this to the github when I can get home and get my logs to include, but it appears, since upgrading to the 5.0 release, that after sometime (I'm unsure of the exact interval) it replaces my GTX 960 group with the hashrates from my GTX 1080 group on the profits screen. I'm unsure if it's using this data for the profit calculation, I would assume yes, but it was late and I couldn't investigate further. So I deleted and rebenchmarked last night, and this morning I woke up to the same thing. I quickly looked at the files in the stats folder, and they appeared to be correct and not with the data the live program was using, but again, didn't have time to look too deeply into it yet. I'm only posting this in case someone else is have this issue as well, and I'll create an issue on github with the relevant logs tonight, when I get home from work.

robl450

newbie

Activity: 126

Merit: 0

Quote from: tutulfo on December 20, 2017, 04:05:25 AM

Quote from: robl450 on December 19, 2017, 08:30:35 PM

potentially I could add the algorithms but there are some that work on one miner and not the other. I can manually go and delete miners and such which I did for one or two, but then it becomes a hassle every time you upgrade versions.

Big problem now is I really want to use MPH but also use the 24 hour profit as it works much better than it switching every whatever minutes to a new algorithm.

MPH hasn´t 24h statistics, only thing you can do is use 24h statistics from Whattomine.

There is a pool called whattomine virtual, it can use any other pool to mine but based on WTM statistics. Default pool order now is: MPH, Suprnova, Yiimp. Search coin in first pool if not find seach second, etc. If you only want to mine on MPH edit this code and delete other pools lines

   switch ($PoolOrder)
   {
   "1"{$PoolToSearch='MINING_POOL_HUB'}
   "2"{$PoolToSearch='Suprnova'}
   "3"{$PoolToSearch='YIIMP'}

   }

I have been loading with start.bat. pick automatic and all options are there, pick automatic 24 hour and MPH is not included there. Are you saying just pick What to mine instead? I want to mine on ahashpool, zpool, hashrefinery and MPH.

ronnylov

member

Activity: 276

Merit: 13

Is there no Linux support for this tool?
I don't like mining in Windows. Only Linux on my miners.

stunvn

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Do you know what pool support payout BCH?

4ward

member

Activity: 473

Merit: 18

Quote from: tutulfo on December 20, 2017, 04:19:50 AM

Quote from: mo35 on December 20, 2017, 04:02:38 AM

Quote from: tutulfo on December 20, 2017, 04:01:10 AM

Quote from: mo35 on December 19, 2017, 09:32:10 PM

question , what am i missing , for example Claymore ETH only testing dual with DCR , even tho Lbry and SC are included in config file , same with Excavator , i manually added additionally Lbry to miner json , still nothing , messing with 5.0 master

p.s. since i have MPH and Yiimp on my pool list , blake2b and lbry should be available ...

have you defined wallets for Yiimp coins?, Yiimp hasn´t autoexchange to BTC, you only can mine on a pool if you has defined wallet for that coin in config.txt

yep , i have defined wallets for all yiimp and mph listed coins

I have tried and found Yiimp pool is "complicated" for dual mining.

Decred pool is usually full
It has Blake2s, but not siacoin only Neva and Tajcoin (has you wallets for that?
Lbry is working well for me when I add @@Walllet_LBC

siacoin = blake2b
blake2s is a different algo

tutulfo

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 105

Quote from: mo35 on December 20, 2017, 04:02:38 AM

Quote from: tutulfo on December 20, 2017, 04:01:10 AM

Quote from: mo35 on December 19, 2017, 09:32:10 PM

question , what am i missing , for example Claymore ETH only testing dual with DCR , even tho Lbry and SC are included in config file , same with Excavator , i manually added additionally Lbry to miner json , still nothing , messing with 5.0 master

p.s. since i have MPH and Yiimp on my pool list , blake2b and lbry should be available ...

have you defined wallets for Yiimp coins?, Yiimp hasn´t autoexchange to BTC, you only can mine on a pool if you has defined wallet for that coin in config.txt

yep , i have defined wallets for all yiimp and mph listed coins

I have tried and found Yiimp pool is "complicated" for dual mining.

Decred pool is usually full
It has Blake2s, but not siacoin only Neva and Tajcoin (has you wallets for that?
Lbry is working well for me when I add @@Walllet_LBC

Topic: Megaminer 6.3 - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher - page 21. (Read 70970 times)