Topic: Member Jollygood of bitcointalk trust abuser and general imbecile. - page 5. (Read 1880 times)

you wrote a lot when in fact your objective was this


honestly, I see no reason for anyone to exclude Jollygood


I confess that I didn't understand anything and there are more things that I can't understand, how is it possible that a person who creates account on February 10 knows so much about Lauda? very long posts, frequent attacks on the trust system and Lauda, you remind me of someone

Maybe those responsible for moderation are showing a great deal of tolerance because of the open and liberal format of the forum. It is precisely because of that open and liberal attitude that some users come along and push the boundaries of trolling and trash-posting.

Unless a consensus can be reached where a united request to ask moderators to take action much early can be put forward, things will remain the same.

I didn't even bother unignoring. Tagged & moved on to the next crybaby thread.

Take over what? This giant pile of shit you call the trust system? Now because I offer any resistance whatsoever to this abuse by exercising my right to have a voice in the system I am trying to "take over"? All I am doing is advocating for supporting people who I think use the trust system properly. Everyone else is free to form their own little cliques and abuse people who criticize them. Of course any time I include, exclude, criticize, or organize people within it it is automatically evidence of abuse of some kind.



Who is free of bias? You? Anyone who claims to be free of bias is lying. You are free to maintain your own bias just as I am, even if that were the case that the list is bias. This list is nothing more than a number of users who I feel either use the trust system appropriately, or abuse it. What you want from me is submission and silence in the face of abuse, not lack of bias.

The problem is inherently a failure of moderation i.e. the staff team. The tolerance for trolling and bullshit is absurd. Nobody needs this.

Another day another bullshit "trust abuse" reputation thread .  This section is starting to look like the the plot of the young and the restless , 100 seasons of the same old recycled crap over and over again.

I know red-trusting CH's alts is a popular sport around here but come on... what possible benefit does this red trust bring to the forum?

On the flip side, there are negative consequences, one of which is new threads popping up to complain about it and a forthcoming new alt account, and generally fueling incessant rants against the system.

I had to unIGNORE you just to see what all the fuss was about and why another thread with my name in the title was started by yet another imbecile  

Not to my surprise after reading it I realised it was nothing much (another pathetic thread) but nonetheless I am posting my views here...

Where is the proof? Link?

I have no interest in any nonsensical guild or any other system within a system that is not authorised as an official facility by theymos. Regarding the link, it is to a useless and worthless thread. Any imbecile can create a thread for the sake of attention seeking and creating division - I do not have much time for those who glorify themselves completely with narcissism.

Where is the proof? Link?

Where is the proof? Link?

That is a new one. I have never been called that before, I will add it to my resumé of being on the receiving end of name-calling.

Where is the proof? Link?

Where is the proof? Link?

Where is the proof? Link?

On the basis of.... ?

Where is the proof? Link?

Really? This right here makes it a biased group. Why you think he listed these names? For fun?

I don't think that can be true. Since the important aspect of the guild is not the specific members, only that they abide with transparent objective standards that provide the optimal environment here that can currently be devised.

JollyGood is a prime example of the urgent need to prevent red tags bring used to crush free speech.

Can't you kids learn how to play nice? Getting a little ridiculous with all these blah blah is a trust abuser threads. Just ~ him and move on.

BTW who cares about the guild bs too, it's just someone(TECHSHARE) trying to start an actual gang. Nothing objective about it. Just a totally biased group hoping to take over IMO.

This member jollygood is using the trust stem as a weapon for personal retribution.

He seems to be upset that he is excluded from the new guild that wishes to establish a transparent set of objective standards that ensure people use the trust system to give warnings to those that pose a direct fnancial threat. Rather than use it to silence people who say things they don't like or point out they are scammer puppets under the guise of scam hunters.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53920334

Jolly good has been. caught out before going after small scams and scammers only to shy away from DT members who are offering to work or assist the very scams he is "apparently" trying to scam hunt??


read thread

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/p2pb2b-resolving-scam-alerts-and-misunderstandings-5205331


read thread


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53296788

see how lauda a few posts up is trying to defend his scamming pal

suchmoon is there calling this blatant scam facilitating and enabling " erratic judgement " until mosprognoz calls him fat. Once suchmoon is insulted they reveal they knew mosprognoz was a scammer all along. Just like she is well aware lauda is a dirty scammer too but dared not openly attack him.

one can research and note how mosprognoz and lauds were all set to work with them and JollyGood did nothing to them, actually you note JollyGood and documented scammer lauds are both crying that mods don't ban people who present truths about them they wish to remain hidden


He is clearly a coward and scammer puppet since why else would he call out scams and punish them then do nothing and say nothing to his DT pals that seek to work with those same scams or offer advice to them to assist their acceptance on this forum..

A double standards cowardly illiterate weasel.


Will police all scams that he feels pose no threat to his position here. Gives his scammer assisting DT handlers a free pass though.

JollyGood of bitcoin talk dirty untrustworthy scumbag.

Examples can be given on request. Or one may view JollyGoods prior behaviors and his lack of action towards DT pals working with, assisting or facilitating the very scams he is busting other members for working with.

Exclude him from your trust lists

~Jolly Good

My sig my avatar are for sale he says.... so are his morals and opinions. These types are all the same.