Depends on how you look at it. If you want a sustainable, deflationary, decentralized currency, then you should want hundreds of thousands, if not millions, transactions in the mempool, because that's where the mining income will come from. If you want a crappy, get-rich-quick shitcoin, that provides no tangible benefit to the world, then yeah, no need to pay high fees. There's fiat.
Depends on his criteria, definition of a good system as I asked him.
Bitcoin blockchain is not perfectly suited for everyone and if a person needs something that is not found in Bitcoin blockchain but can be found in other alternative blockchains, bank system or others, he should pick alternatives to use.
If the need is a high number for Transaction per seconds TPS, altcoins can meet that need but with altcoin blockchain, security is a big problem.
Transaction per secondIf the need is security-wise, Bitcoin blockchain is the best. You can use this blockchain to move coins with very high transaction value, with same transaction fee of small transaction, and with less risk of network attack.
That's for those who are aware and also use the right wallets. Do you think everybody knows this? The post is not about me and what I know alone, it's for everybody that could be benefited.
Not all people on Earth know about Bitcoin and not all people who are using Bitcoin blockchain know basics about Bitcoin blockchain, wallets, transactions.
The bottom line is: It's not responsibility of Bitcoin or Satoshi Nakamoto.
People need to learn basics to use anything. It's their responsibilities. They need education for themselves and who can help them if they don't want to learn with many free resources on Internet. If they are lazy, they have to spend expensive fee not only for transactions but also for risk to be scammed by centralized exchanges.
If they have time and can use Internet to complain, they can stop such activities and use their time, Internet to learn basics.