It seems to me that merit is not at present a useful instrument for regulating this forum. Merit became a subject for sale. No one gives merit, just like that.
I do get merits from merit sources "just like that".
There are only a few cases when someone sent the merit of someone just like that.
Many not few.
I have repeatedly witnessed how people wrote good themes, great and having a good meaning, topics which conducted a good analysis of coins, but unfortunately no one has given for such topics merits.
What is meritable and what is not is subjective.
I have request one thing opinion, that such themes can be create only for order to you the credited for this subject previously purchased you merit.
Need a new keyboard? Dont ask me for me.
1. Give merit to people who create threads and topics are becoming popular. If the topic has 10 pages of comments - then to add 5 merits.
So spam mega threads with useless pages full of bullshit are going to be merited and not small worthwhile discussions?
2. If a member has more than 100 activity on the forum is to enroll him 10 merits. More than 200 activity, give 100 merits.
Free merits = faster ranking up for shitposters.
Considering its coming from the bottomfeeder shitposters mouth.
I don't see any other options at the moment.
Open your eyes.
Or buy merit. Personally, I am against such practices. It seems to me that the system of merit, unfortunately made this forum for many people commercial enterprise.
Such cases are tagged by DT.
We need new ideas to solve this problem, because I repeat that there are no other ways to increase their rank, in addition to buying merit at the moment.
The mission of merit is thus accomplished.