Topic: Merit abuse by merit source in the Russian local (Read 1064 times)

After reading the opinions of different users, I came to the conclusion that my allegations of merit abuse of distribution are not fair.
Therefore, I apologize to those whom I offended.
and close this topic

Wow bounty cheater does not see abuse from me? Good.

Maybe he improved his mental health? I doubt it 


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=623643;dt

I'm not going to make excuses because I'm innocent. I have published about 50 articles and translations of various topics on this forum, and many users liked it. I will continue to do so. Thanks to the users of the English section, for what quickly figured out this situation.

I don't see here any merit from Ratimov. All those people using their own merit. For example, i love to merit funny posts of WunderSchwein. Would it be considered as "abuse"?


I don't see any abuse. Topics look like old topic of pour famous clown - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/supporting-of-shitposting-by-merit-source-is-it-trustworthy-5161276

The only difference between it is the fact that Zuzma don't try to manipulate with translate. But in other way, is really looks like the same (i'm talking about the fact that there is no abuse)

So it will be good to stop all of this and don't create any more drama. I doubt that META needs more drama that it has for now.

It's really funny to see russians talking to each other through the Google translate. You guys are eligible to serve as new definition of "idiot" in the wordreference dictionary.

Dear qwk, good evening!
Thanks for writing in my thread.
Your opinion is important to me.

Best regards

The problem actually is much deeper. I need no merits cause I don’t monetize my presence on BTT. The problem is that the russian locale is corrupted by nepotism and false enthusiasm of a group of users. Two years ago they didn’t give a f*** about spam, offtop, shitposting etc., but with the new system they immediately became interested in reporting and investigations. This is a group of toxic no-lifers, they are here only to earn money, to become moderators, to merit hunting... Their ”work” is not sincere because most of them knows nothing about cryptocurrencies and the most odious and hated of them is well known as bitcoin hater KTChampions.

It’s all about money guys.

Dear Zuzma,

first of all, your poor knowledge of English is excused.
Thank you for bringing your opinion to my attention.

Since you asked for "help in a fair decision" on your subjective "assessment", I would very much like to offer said help.
To make it short: you are quite obviously mistaken.
The (superficially suspicious) pattern of a merit circle among the aforementioned users seems to be a simple result of high quality posts by them, which are clearly recognizable as such, since they are also getting a lot of merit from others (for which the non-highlighted transactions were more useful than the highlighted ones).

Glad to be of service anytime

P.S.: sorry for my poor English

Of course Yes, if these three people work better than those 67.
I gave a complete list of posts for which I received merit from meritsors, everyone can look at the amount of work that I performed.


Friends? You must remember the times when with some of them I was enemies  


He is worse (much) because he is a liar and inadequate. He didn’t blame himself for his plagiarism, but those who found it (Ratimov) and somehow me (logic?!).


This was not a "question". He immediately called us scammers (see the initial message).
And after I provided a complete list of my posts, for some reason I see no objection or apology from him  
So he does not need any justice - on the contrary, he wants to slander us, though he is so stupid that it turns out very badly.

Hi guys! Sorry for my English ... It is really bad ...

I want to say a few words on this topic ...
I do not know how much this can be called "abuse" ... Everyone has the right to dispose of Merit as he wants!

 BUT!

Among these guys there is a new Russian Meritsource ... Which claims the following:


Okay ... How do you think this approach? Is it fair to give 127 merits to 3 people, and the remaining 67 people from the list of about 360 merits?
Just press Y /N ...

And given that the first 6 users are "friends" of our source from this topic, the situation becomes even more interesting!)

Good care of locale, right?

As for Zuzma - why did both of you, Ratimov and the Champion, mention his ban? But if my memory serves me, then lovesmayfamilis was also once banned, like Zuzma! Why is she worse than her?

This whole situation means that the person was tired of the injustice in his native locale and he committed suicide decided to turn to this place with his question!)

I can read Russian and I can say for sure that these users have been abusing Merit and Trust systems for a long time. They do not understand for what these systems are created. They give merit because of friendship, and the Trust simply copy-pasting without understanding the essence of the problem. They do not care about people. One of them will say "let's ruin his reputation" and then they do it without hesitation. I call these guys jackals. This guys is a shame of Russians. Most of them were banned for the use of signatures and therefore they take revenge on other users. You can see the jackals in my trust.

My English is bad

Perhaps Zuzma wants to say that in the Russian-speaking locale you need a second active meritors? After all, Meritsors Ratimov writes - "I cover the entire locale and give merits on all sections, no one else does this in the Russian section". Merits in the Russian-speaking forum locale are not distributed evenly enough. This opinion was expressed. Perhaps you need another ACTIVE meritorsource?

Need a second Meritsource? Yes?

I use Google translator so I could pick up the wrong word.
As you rightly noted, the Russian moderator actively supports the merit of these users. therefore, I turned to non-interested users of this forum. I do not trust Xandry user
This is by no means revenge, but the struggle for the equal right of all users of the Russian section.



at the beginning of my message, I indicated that this is my opinion.
so I turned to the community.
learn to read carefully. This is an international section, and here you will quickly be painted for distorting facts and words.
you are very much at risk of accusing me of abusing my use of the trust system, because this is only your subjective point of view.

I can read it too, but I don’t understand your ”posts deserving merits”... Sure, some posts... Everyone can check the top 10 merited users above and compare with the most active users of the topic below:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105163.5460

It’s clear enough without any learning of russian

Hi johhnyUA!
which of these posts is the most useful? I can add such posts yet
In addition, there is blackmail from a respected member of DT lovesmayfamilis

But i can. Despite I have good relationships with Zuzma, i can say that he is wrong here. Posts deserving merits, for honest.

It's obvious that every merit source will have some people to whom he gives more merit, it's normal. The same was with chimk or Vadi2323, despite they were good meritsources.

So i don't see any "abuse" or any another reasons to continue this topic.


For honest, i wouldn't be so categorical with labels like "his friends" or something like that. Also, post enough good to receive 1-2 merits.

Thank you all for your attention.
abuse of merit began not so long ago, if you look at the photo above you will see that ratimov distributes bounties first of all to his comrades.
merits are also distributed for meaningless posts

The mere amount sent to and fro between accounts, on it’s owns, normally leads to misinterpretations, and although numbers may act as lead indicators, it is the actual post content that allows us in the best case to back an accusation such as that cast in the OP.

The aggregate numbers between the four accounts are as follows:
https://public.tableau.com/shared/S8F2Q7ZDX?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link

As I said, Merit abuse needs to be really blatant for an accusation to stand, and that is pretty difficult to see here when there is a language barrier. Besides that, I’ve seen accusations of the kind before, where the basis were the numbers that went to and fro, and the accusation was then total off, related to the fact that the accused accounts were often engaged in conversation that brought content to the section over an extended period of time, often posting together in the same sections.

As things stand, I remain numerically sceptical that the number of merits and number of TXs lead to backing-up the accusation, and I declare myself incompetent to go into the content and context of any of those merited posts.

As to the accusation of those listed being scammers, you fail to provide any proof nor formal grounds for the accusation in the OP, lest it be relative to the alleged Merit abuse, in which case the scam, as a term and accusation, does not stand (perhaps a language thingy). Anything else on the scam front should be likely placed on its own in Reputation or Scam Accusations, whichever suits best the set of evidences yet to be presented.

No comments . All that remains is pity for such people. Ratimov Russian Meritsors. He rates posts across the Russian locale. See fully what topics it covers.