Topic: Merit - right to consensus - page 2. (Read 914 times)

Giving one merit was how you got caught. You used two accounts and pretended to be different people even leaving trust for your invented alter ego. You are a fraud and you have been marked.

My eyes be dazzled with your words. OMG!

1.Attitude towards beginners is bad. I completely outraged by the usurpers of power in this forum.

2. I'm surprised by your logic when you give to another people red trust for one merit.

3. If you're a fraud, you must be marked. If you gave one merit to your twink only for test because one merit it makes no sense then legendaries marked you. Now you understand comparison?

Oh my you really are stupid aren't you..

It's good rules but old school people from this forum configured for beginners very bad.. can you please translate this into English
I am at a loss from the brains of these people.. can you please translate this into English
When you are not scammer or ponzi founder or other shits .. can you please translate this into English

thanks

It's good rules but old school people from this forum configured for beginners very bad. When you are not scammer or ponzi founder or other shits  then you receive untrust with comments "farming merits and trusts" for one merit and trust. I am at a loss from the brains of these people...

 
 

Here to you no one should not! You are here on a visit or you accept forum rules or not!

First, I did not hide my second account.
Second, I did not farm merits, I only sent one merit to my another account. And same thing I did test with trust system because someone gave me red trust. Merits owners today sell out or giving for friends about >50 merits. And I was bad because gave 1 merit to my twink lol.
Good to you and love with Lauda

Thanks for reminding me, plus giving me all the more reason to tag both of the #1061902 “HALLASTERA” and #1257862 “kinki32” accounts:

#1 No you didnt violate the rules of the forum, you are not banned. Scammers are not banned either, its not a violation of the rules. The trust system works in addition to the rules.

#2 You clearly understand merit and trust are important, hance you gave it yourself.

#3 You either have mutliple personalities[1] or you clearly understood that giving yourself a positive trust rating would not look good. Thus you worded it in a way that HALLASTERA and kinki32 are not the same person. In case your dementia also kicks in, here is a screenshot.



#3.1 you clearly wanted to hide your second account or your first, whichever is which.

#4 You lied and tried to bullshit your way out of the situation.

#5 Go away.

[1] does not change a thing, but get help maybe?

There is no need to that. In fact, the people with most number of merits (merit sources) are not declared. This is done so that no one troubles them or begs from them.

I have no allergy to work, but it's not fair when you must to kiss ass anybody who have merits so that up status on forum

That’s a real insult to those of us newer users who have been working hard, and having our hard work recognized with merit.

But at least you more or less openly admit that your objection to the merit system is medical:  You have an allergy to hard work.  Dirtball.

I can't relax because only for authority people system is good for another noname's it's badly! They spend merits from one to another and talking about "You want ranks? You must work hard because I came before you"

I didn’t do anything!  The grey aliens did it—and by that, I mean the hive-mind of you/Lauda/theymos/et al.  ← [new excuse of next user caught merit-farming]

(The crypto-lover in me tried to find a hidden message spelt out in the sizing and capitalization of those letters.  Either there isn’t one, or I fail at quick mental codebreaking—or I missed something because I have webfont-loading disabled for security reasons.  On the plus side, the chip implanted in my head by you/Lauda/the CIA is now downloading the forum oligarchy’s directives for persecuting and oppressing poor, innocent users such as HALLASTERA/kinki32.  —Oh!  I just now received a directive to say, “Muahahaha!”)

P.S., cultural cross-pollination:  Spamfighters on news.admin.net-abuse.email are all part of and/or on the payroll of a “lumber cartel”, which fears the competition of environmentally friendly e-mail advertising to deadtree spam direct marketing.  Of course, they all deny it with the acronym TINLC (“There Is No Lumber Cartel”).  Among others which are similar, this tradition dates back to the ’90s, when it grew from the seriously stated accusations of an actual spammer.  Spammers are so oft possessed of certain mental characteristics, which do not change with time or the medium being spammed.

n.a.n-a.e. was always one of the toughest newsgroups.  As you well know, spammers are nasty, self-entitled, mentally unstable morons with persecution complexes who impotently fantasize about revenge on anybody who interferes with their “marketing” efforts.  Most of the n.a.n-a.e. regulars did/do fight spam as part or all of their jobs, in the capacity of sysadmins, network consultants, or employees of companies developing antispam products.  They always had to be tough as nails, biting back hard when necessary.  You, Lauda, and a few others would fit right in there; given the nature of online pseudonymity, who knows if you did/do?  —Eureka!  I have another theory!  YOU ARE PAID BY THE LUMBER CARTEL!

Relax man. Merit system is implemented just about a week ago. Currently, there are certain problems with it but we still don't know what it will bring about. It's better to spot the problems happening than just complaining that the system is bad.

Quoted so this statement can remain on the record.

hO^w _daRE yOu e_DIT m^Y qUoTE?! wHy, i oU^gHt tO tEa _{cH y}oU a^LeS^SoN, _paL! fiLthY _sCA^mMeRS!

I presume universal suffrage, and a strictly ochlocratic democratic rule of “one account, one vote”.

Thereupon, I wrack my brains:  Who would advocate a vote amongst a population which has been invaded by large masses of spammers, and still much larger masses of spammers’ farmed alt accounts?

Cui bono?

Too bad, I am not smart enough to figure this out.  I suppose that my abysmal lack of intelligence is why I need to whine about the merit system and scheme to undermine it, instead of undertaking the impossible task of writing posts which people like.

---

There you go, the Legendaries’ oligarchic old boys’ club locking out downtrodden new users like me.  When do I get to also be actmyname, Lauda, aTriz, DarkStar_, hilariousandco, and theymos?  You Legendaries are all the same person scratching each others’ (singular) back, and pushing down users who have a RIGHT to be imagined to be your alter ego in whackjob theories by users who got caught doing something bad.

STOP THE PREJUDICE.  WE ARE ALL YOU.  ACTMYNAME = LAUDA = ATRIZ = DARKSTAR_ = HILARIOUSANDCO = THEYMOS = US!

I will save newbies the trouble here:  THE TRUTH is that this forum has exactly one user, “theymos”, who runs bots to create good posts, bad posts, spam posts, and arguments between putative spammers and putative antispammers.  If you join this forum, then you will become one of theymos’ bots, too.  And you shall.  I know this because the proved scientific of solipsism has proved that you are all figments of my imagination.  Thus, you are all... me.

  You make me rolling around, papa.

It's only conclusion from Lauda logic. While one account got merits or trusts from another account then it "farming" 0xa0xa