Pages:
Author

Topic: Merit source unapplication - Vlad2Vlad - page 2. (Read 770 times)

legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
October 26, 2020, 03:38:32 PM
#8
I’m sure he sent multiple 50 Merit loads to shit posters in the past too. When questioned about it he was just laughing, as if he is immune to being pulled up on his Merit abuse. I mean look at his sent Merit, it’s littered with large merit dumps on utter shit posts.

I definitely support suchmoon’s idea of removing his merit source status. There must be more deserving potential sources in the altcoin sub.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
October 26, 2020, 02:55:09 PM
#7
He means that suchmoon's (un)application should be accepted.

That's how I interpret it too. But just to make it clear - I'm not applying for anything myself. Just trying to point out that one merit source probably should be replaced with one or more new merit sources, and there are quite a few applications on this board to choose from.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2017
October 26, 2020, 02:41:30 PM
#6
application should be accepted.

Are you on some heavy drugs?   Roll Eyes
Did you even read what OP posted?


It is pretty clear to me that he is talking to suchmoon.

He means that suchmoon's (un)application should be accepted.

If you had quoted the word "your", you would have seen it more clearly:

I agree that your application should be accepted.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
October 26, 2020, 01:28:10 PM
#5
application should be accepted.

Are you on some heavy drugs?   Roll Eyes
Did you even read what OP posted?
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 322
October 26, 2020, 11:59:31 AM
#4
I just have checked his recent sent merit history and it more looks like kind of nepotism and I agree that your application should be accepted.

And bunch of merits sent to BSV?
I think there's no problem if a post deserves merit. I would send merits anyone who deserve them regardless of the username. But this case is a little different though.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 3191
Leave no FUD unchallenged
October 26, 2020, 11:01:23 AM
#3
Yeah, that looks like some pretty egregious abuse.  I can see the benefit in meriting unconventional wisdom, but not outright bias like this.  Would love to hear their attempt at a justification for all that (not that I imagine it would sway my support of this proposal).
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
October 26, 2020, 10:20:52 AM
#2
Did he also supported CSW Faketoshi?
That is a sin Smiley
And bunch of merits sent to BSV?

I never liked following the herd.  BTC gonna get rekt this year so you better dump on the next big run this summer.  CSW will turn up on top so maybe take off the haters glasses and look at his factual work.
Bad prophecy
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
October 26, 2020, 09:40:53 AM
#1
Just leaving this here for the next merit sorcery realignment.

IXCoin - a horrible shitcoin by any measure, dead website, no volume, etc - has the most merited (in 2020) ANN thread on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55453820

The reason is Vlad2Vlad who claims to be "Lead dev and CTO and CEO of IXcoin" and happens to be a merit source sending large amounts of merit in that thread. He's also doing the same thing in own thread shilling IXC: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-riddle-of-the-twin-brothers-who-were-are-and-will-rule-the-world-317658

I know the post quality is quite subjective but this looks like a massive conflict of interest and not the best use of source merits. Perhaps a different merit source can be selected for the altcoin boards who would prop up more than one shitcoin thread.
Pages:
Jump to: