Merit System Introduction / Rank Change - page 2.

Guapongbadoy

newbie

Activity: 124

Merit: 0

Quote from: DanielRR1997 on February 01, 2018, 05:58:46 PM

I did not think it fair to change who changed the ranking just in the week of implementation of this new system. The merit should be proportional to the number of user activity, for example I have activity to be a full member (126) but I was awarded 10 merits , and a user with 60 activity earned the same number of merits (10) as me. This is not fair, it needs to be reviewed

You are member and that is your advantage over me, but still you have that courage to speak a word which seems you do not understand what you are saying, maybe you did not read the thread about merit and so you make a post without reading and understand the new system about it.
I believe this is the major problem of many here, making a post or reply with out fully understand of what they are trying to say.

Triple

hero member

Activity: 847

Merit: 500

Quote from: DanielRR1997 on February 01, 2018, 05:58:46 PM

I did not think it fair to change who changed the ranking just in the week of implementation of this new system. The merit should be proportional to the number of user activity, for example I have activity to be a full member (126) but I was awarded 10 merits , and a user with 60 activity earned the same number of merits (10) as me. This is not fair, it needs to be reviewed

Just work your way up. Merit shouldn't be looked like as importantly as you are trying to make it. If you post good content, you'll be rewarded by merits from other users. Don't talk about fair/not fair. This is a great way to combat spam and doesn't need any 'reviews'

legendster

hero member

Activity: 1778

Merit: 764

www.V.systems

Quote from: DanielRR1997 on February 01, 2018, 05:58:46 PM

I did not think it fair to change who changed the ranking just in the week of implementation of this new system. The merit should be proportional to the number of user activity, for example I have activity to be a full member (126) but I was awarded 10 merits , and a user with 60 activity earned the same number of merits (10) as me. This is not fair, it needs to be reviewed

IMO users like you, who whine without actually reading what's already written and discussed here a thousand times, should never be allowed to take part in any signature campaign. I mean seriously! Read the hundred other posts about the issue and enlighten yourself. Also, this forum is run by Theymos and his associates. Do not like how this place is run? Feel free to leave.
Merit is a privilege, not a right.

DanielRR1997

member

Activity: 196

Merit: 14

I did not think it fair to change who changed the ranking just in the week of implementation of this new system. The merit should be proportional to the number of user activity, for example I have activity to be a full member (126) but I was awarded 10 merits , and a user with 60 activity earned the same number of merits (10) as me. This is not fair, it needs to be reviewed

Topic: Merit System Introduction / Rank Change - page 2. (Read 348 times)