Topic: Meta posting - summa cum Lauda (sic) - page 3. (Read 921 times)
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda 
]
]Clearly, you're infected with cattus vulgaris.
But, although I've sent a lot of merit in meta, never saw that reference before.
Please don't tell me it was always there
>..<
I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.
ah man, Legend...
JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking
I prefer public analysis...........transparency is key.
I expect jet cash to examine the evidence provided in this thread and confirm
1. lauda is a liar.
2. Lauda will red trust you for presenting facts about this (even after he gets to call you a liar with no evidence many times)
3. Tman red trust abuse people ( as he stats in black and white for posting facts about it)
It is quite simple and there in black and white.
red trust is not there to stop people telling the truth it is there to allow people to tell the truth about wrong doing and untrustworthy behaviour.
I expect a full review
If jetcash refuses to do this after I have just told him 2 x and provided evidence on this thread then jetcash is also untrustworthy and complicit . Or he is just a scared baby of lauda and his friends.
I want all my red trust removed else I will present the facts they should not be there. That is not blackmail that is reporting an abuse of the trust system. Got it.
@Harkorede
where are you with all your evidence that I asked for tick tock.... or else you have just proven you are an imbecile and your opinions are invalid. I mean if I am wrong about everything..... then you can provide just a couple of examples right?? where are you?
>..<
I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.
ah man, Legend...
JC for president... or PM might be a quicker action the way the exit is looking
>..<
I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.
LOL .... ha ha that is refusal to review observable fact. Hmm a DT who says they are not interested in reviewing the truth. Is that what you are saying?
Well look the evidence is there above in this thread do you refuse to review it??
If so you need instant removal from DT and merit source you are not responsible.
I expect an answer or I want you removed from dt and merit source.
You can not as a DT refuse to read facts I am producing here for you to examine.
>..<
I haven't read all of his/her posts, only those that are relevant or of interest to me. This is why I have read very few of yours.
My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.
are you completely thick as well.... your anecdotal experience does not preclude or protect or undo what I have proven he has done. Please start to understand this simple concept.
his own post history is not hearsay - is there something wrong with you? do you know that something he has written himself which is a proven lie is not hearsay. You can understand this right?
I have proven he is a liar
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/mods-deleted-my-post-moglie-dont-worry-i-will-repost-it-here-red-trust-scam-5098591
I have proven he is an abuser of the trust system
I have proven his friend tman is an abuser of the trust system 2x now.
Do you deny either of those??
If so explain yourself now.
My opinion of Lauda is based on my personal encounters and observations. I use that rather than being swayed by hearsay. I'm starting to wonder if Soros is funding the movements against long term members of this forum.
~snip~
FACT is no one gives a shit, please take all these personal attacks to the reputation section, you are really starting to fuck up meta. And no I will not remove my tags so you will leave us all alone - neither will the others.
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda]
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda
]respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.
You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.
You're never going to stop, are you ?
A lost course... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.
No, re read the post again. I have proven facts that he is a liar and abuses the trust system. Disprove that then you can give your groundless opinions. Are you completely stupid, how can I be wrong regarding proven facts. Explain.
Whilst you are about it can you present anything else you find that I am wrong about? go on ... get on with it. Demonstrate all those things I have been wrong about because as yet NOBODY has demonstrated that I am wrong about anything.
Until I see a complete removal of red trust abuse on my account then NO i will not stop presenting facts that is should not be there.
Well done.
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda]
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda
]respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.
You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.
You're never going to stop, are you ?
A lost cause... I'm sure deep down within you, you must already know you're wrong about almost everything you post. Your ego is your real enemy here.
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda]
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda
]respected by ass kissers like you only... plenty know lauda is a liar and a scum bag.
You are a noob who has no clue. Do you get it yet.
I have proven he is a liar and gave me red trust from him for daring to say I would inform people of that FACT
Yeah! I think we should set a new trend: Regardless of what the subject of your thread is, include the word Lauda in the title somehow. 
Lauda is a great member of this forum.
I remember this case: About Ethereum Plus (scam)
Lauda was very helpful
I remember this case: About Ethereum Plus (scam)
Lauda was very helpful
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda ]
Dammit! it's another thread about Lauda ]
LoyceV needs to update this: All topics about Lauda in Meta and Reputation. Data are old now there.
When posting on the Meta board, is it really necessary to include some reference to Lauda?
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda]
Whilst I appreciate that merits are awarded for posts based on "honoribus cum laude", please not the word is "laude", which means praise, and not Lauda, who is a respected member of the forum. Is there a chance that we can have a month or two without constant bitching about Lauda?
[ Dammit, this is another thread started by that Jet Cash character, and it even includes a reference to Lauda
] Jump to: