Give a man a fish, and you might feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you could feed him for a lifetime.
A more reasonable idea and feeding them for days and months is not the answer, as our government has practiced, it just makes people even more lazy to find work. Providing fishing media for a fish man is far more correct, because they can catch fish for their daily needs and fish that can be sold to buy other needs.
Providing food for a lifetime is an impossible job and I'm sure no one wants to bear that burden, except for the head of the household who has such a responsibility.
While it seems that hobbies like hunting and fishing are on a decline. Perhaps current era food prices are exactly what they need to make a return?
This trend is decreasing even further and people prefer to endure hunger and hope for help from the government, rather than finding solutions for their lives. The current human mindset is instantaneous because they don't want to bother with the process, so relying on anything that is important is no longer working as hunters, fishing and farming. What's wrong with all this? Why do people prefer to wait? There is a lot of available land, but don't want to use it?
This is nothing more than a government program that pampers the people with monthly fees and in my country there are many sources of assistance from the government which are given every month, thus making the head of the household even more lazy to work. I prefer the government's presence not to help in the form of assistance, both in the form of money and food, but to provide access for the people to work, but unfortunately this is not done and the people are increasingly spoiled because of the sources of assistance they provide even though the amount cannot be said to be more than Enough.
There are places in the wild where fruits and vegetables grow naturally. Some are located close to official hiking trails and natural landmarks like waterfalls.
The question is how long can it last? will the supply of naturally grown fruits and vegetables be sufficient for future generations?
Meanwhile, debts are becoming increasingly arid, rice fields and agricultural land have lost their function because magnificent and tall buildings have been erected, so that future generations will find it increasingly difficult to find land that they can use. Imagine the next few decades when our children and grandchildren kill each other because food is increasingly difficult for them to get, so they have to compete with one another to get food. If no one thought about it today, wouldn't it be impossible for our children and grandchildren's lives in the future to be even more cruel to preserve their lives?
What are other good methods of cutting costs on food items?
Government policy to protect rice fields and not give full permission to construct buildings. Cut any permits that are not profitable for agricultural land and provide access to the community for agricultural land that is supported by technology and no longer uses traditional farming methods that take a long time to work, every harvest time the government must come down to buy everything from the community and the market is well controlled concerned with price, so that farmers are no longer confused about who to sell their crops to.
Restarting a progressive agricultural system by incorporating technology, so that people don't feel bored cultivating and growing vegetables, in some Asian regions agriculture is a little advanced and even many undergraduate graduates are involved in agriculture because they see good prospects in agriculture. Their existence is not enough to represent the total population in Asia as a percentage, which means that the presence of the government is considered important to socialize this program as a continuation.