Pages:
Author

Topic: #metoo as I say, not as I do - Bill C-51 - Sexual Assault Law In Canada - page 2. (Read 475 times)

legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
Quote
For example, it is not legally possible to claim that a third party offered consent on another’s behalf or to assert that a failure to resist equates to consent.

I definitely agree to this though there might be some greyzone area here - tbh didnt even knew it was possible.


Regarding the rest im not sure, maybe someone can explain with some example case what the change would mean.

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
https://www.demelolaw.com/bill-c-51-proposed-changes-to-sexual-assault-law-in-canada/

Does any one else see a problem with this? Is this not just guilty until proven innocent? Do people have any concept of the damage that will be done to innocent people in a blind quest to protect women at all costs? This just totally upends the standard of innocent until proven guilty and forces the accused to first prove they are innocent before being able to access evidence that might exonerate them.
Pages:
Jump to: