Microsoft to acquire Activision for $69B is all about Metaverse

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 6403

Blackjack.fun

Quote from: dothebeats on January 19, 2022, 06:44:16 PM

I think we are connecting the word "Metaverse" with cryptocurrencies that much. The metaverse is, IMO, a word that describes interconnectedness of existing services and platforms through a single link. It isn't necessarily related to cryptocurrencies, as those who use it to brand what they do don't even have tokens or cryptos dedicated to it.

Exactly and I would go even further, the metaverse was never about cryptocurrencies or NFTs or anything like this, some projects grabbed the buzzword and did a full rebranding from the ding hype of Defi to Metaverse tokens even without a plan how they would make this metaverse.
Playing diablo or growing jpg monkeys, none of those are about a metaverse.
They will just use Blizzard's knowledge and resources to actually try and develop something that could be called a metaverse, not that you;re suddenly going to trade shitcoins on all games owned by Activision.

And no, the current games are not going to be destroyed by some shittokens:

Quote from: Leviathan.007 on January 20, 2022, 03:42:46 PM

I don't remember exactly when this happened but a few months ago Activision started to do some partnership with the blizzard and they even changed the name into blizzard Activision but the partnership failed and as far as I know, there were many steamers that quit streaming their games because of they after this they lose their reputation and as an easy bite they were ready to be bought by a giant like Microsoft,

What a bunch of nonsense.
Vivendi (Blizzard and Sierra) and Activision merged in 2008 and they have been like that for 14 years.
Easy bite at 69 billion? That's the same value BMW is quoted for.

tygeade

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1058

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

This is the most expensive acquisition of Microsoft since time and we can't help speculating how much the metaverse tokens will be when Mircrosoft finally launch thier own in the metaverse. There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

But with this Activision + Metaverse, I think this is going to be a good decision for them to develop. Activision has lots of games where gamers are actively playing and the Metaverse which we can consider to be the future. This might just be one of Microsoft's best investments and projects to develop and get successful with. Unless they become very aggressive again and deploy KYC in games. You think?

Microsoft just bought a company for the staff and the rights basically. Activision holds so much IP and thats just too much to give up. When you have that kind of rights, you could literally go with any other method and use those IP's to make money. Imagine having pokemon rights, you could ignore all the ones made so far and just focus on what you can make in the future and that would still be awesome.

This is not exactly about metaverse at all, but it is also about everything, literally everything. If you know what you are doing then microsoft should be able to start regular games, continue old ones, get new ideas, metaverse, movies, and many different things to be fair.

Leviathan.007

hero member

Activity: 1806

Merit: 722

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

I don't remember exactly when this happened but a few months ago Activision started to do some partnership with the blizzard and they even changed the name into blizzard Activision but the partnership failed and as far as I know, there were many steamers that quit streaming their games because of they after this they lose their reputation and as an easy bite they were ready to be bought by a giant like Microsoft, in the other hand Microsoft seems to be interested with Metaverse so that was a good idea for them to use this chance and acquire Activision so this way they can have strong step in Metaverse.

doomloop

hero member

Activity: 2408

Merit: 584

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

with this Activision + Metaverse, I think this is going to be a good decision for them to develop. Activision has lots of games where gamers are actively playing and the Metaverse which we can consider to be the future. This might just be one of Microsoft's best investments and projects to develop and get successful with. Unless they become very aggressive again and deploy KYC in games. You think?

I think it is about working with the trend, because other companies are also going into metaverse so as to be part of the emerging Web 3.0. And you can also see the new acquisition as a bid to diversify their investment. It is right move for me and if they are able to manage it well it will not die off like Skype and yahoo.

bakasabo

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1223

With all this trendy play-to-earn I think we will see implementation of NFT in next Blizzard games. World of Warcraft, MMORPG with the largest amount of players, suits perfectly. Besides actual game, there is a pet wars in-game activity. NFT suits perfectly in this cute pets game. Just a 100% hit. Hearthstone - another perfect match for NFT implementation. What can be better than implementing NFT card in a card game.

I will call it a win-win scenario for everyone. Microsoft will earn from it. With Microsoft money and fresh politics, gamers will also win (because more and more often players scold Blizzard for controversial decisions). Cryptocurrency will get a new popularization push.

kryptqnick

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1402

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

I think Microsoft is simply profit-oriented and believes that even such a big price will pay off. It's unreal that they can actually afford a purchase like that, and where are those antitrust laws now? This is just another step towards monopolies on the market of digital products. We have a few big players like Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple and Alphabet (Google's parent company), and they are killing the competition, leaving no chance to smaller companies. At the same time, I wonder what Microsoft wants to do in terms of the Metaverse because Facebook called dibs on that first, and having multiple metaverses kind of defeats the whole point.

Looper_U

member

Activity: 369

Merit: 16

$CYBERCASH METAVERSE

Metaverse on the blockchain will definitely have tokens but not metaverse in gaming world of Microsoft so don't expect some kind of crypto coin, it's really a good news for Xbox and pc gamers but I doubt that all Activision games won't reach other third party consoles as well

davis196

hero member

Activity: 3192

Merit: 939

Quote

There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

You forgot to mention Bing. Grin

The only difference is that Bing was created by Microsoft,rather than being a separate company,which is acquired by them.
Jokes aside,I don't really think that Bing is dead.They are just totally behind Google in the search engine niche.The entire MSN portal is totally behind Google.
Anyway,paying 69 billion for a gaming company seems overpriced.Microsoft have Xbox,can't they just develop and expand Xbox even further,rather than spending billions on a gaming company?
Maybe there's something in the bigger picture,which I'm not seeing.
But yeah,this news definitely doesn't have anything to do with the metaverse concept.

dothebeats

legendary

Activity: 3542

Merit: 1352

I think we are connecting the word "Metaverse" with cryptocurrencies that much. The metaverse is, IMO, a word that describes interconnectedness of existing services and platforms through a single link. It isn't necessarily related to cryptocurrencies, as those who use it to brand what they do don't even have tokens or cryptos dedicated to it. As for MS acquiring Activision, perhaps they can step up the games that the studio is producing. Not saying that they haven't produced anything good, but at this point most of what they are coming up with are cliche games that have entirely predictable storylines.

paxmao

legendary

Activity: 2394

Merit: 1632

Do not die for Putin

It is not just about the metaverse, but rather a combination of franchises that reinforce MS xbox sales - e.g. they could decide to public CoD only for their gear, also they buy expertise in creating games, universes and stories successfully from Blizzard and Activision and then, yes, they leave a door open to the metaverse. MS is known for usually not being the best, but having a marketing and client channel control that is like a train. They can afford to let other create the market and fail if it is so required and then come and take the whole market.

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Quote from: South Park on January 19, 2022, 04:23:18 PM

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

This is the most expensive acquisition of Microsoft since time and we can't help speculating how much the metaverse tokens will be when Mircrosoft finally launch thier own in the metaverse. There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

But with this Activision + Metaverse, I think this is going to be a good decision for them to develop. Activision has lots of games where gamers are actively playing and the Metaverse which we can consider to be the future. This might just be one of Microsoft's best investments and projects to develop and get successful with. Unless they become very aggressive again and deploy KYC in games. You think?

Also in Cointelegraph https://cointelegraph.com/news/microsoft-s-massive-metaverse-move-buying-activision-for-69b

I do not like this at all, I like Activision and some of their games, it is obvious that for the short term this is a move by Microsoft to enlarge the games they offer on the xbox and for pc gaming, however I was not really aware that Activision was a large player on the metaverse, are they really that important for Microsoft to buy them for such a huge sum of money instead of developing their own tech?

Microsoft wouldnt be spending out billions without thinking or without basis and we know on how relevant Activision is and speaking of metaverse and if Microsoft is really prepping for that one

then this kind of action isnt really a bad idea at all even though we cant say that it would really be a good choice nor effective but we know on what industry they are focusing into.

Investment made by Microsoft would always be a gamble but they arent that dumb on not to see those probabilities.

Gyfts

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 1519

Quote from: bitmover on January 19, 2022, 12:23:32 PM

..

"Gaming" is the biggest form of entertainment there is, and Activision is apparently involved in some mobile games as well, another free-for-all type market. Microsoft is only heading where the money is, I'm not seeing where the connection to the "metaverse" is.

Too many people throwing around a buzzword proposed by disconnected silicon valley tech elites that need to generate more start up funding from venture capitalist billionaires. I'm sure introducing the "metaverse" helps with their funding rounds, but perhaps not to anyone else that doesn't live in that tech bubble.

South Park

hero member

Activity: 2884

Merit: 794

I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

This is the most expensive acquisition of Microsoft since time and we can't help speculating how much the metaverse tokens will be when Mircrosoft finally launch thier own in the metaverse. There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

But with this Activision + Metaverse, I think this is going to be a good decision for them to develop. Activision has lots of games where gamers are actively playing and the Metaverse which we can consider to be the future. This might just be one of Microsoft's best investments and projects to develop and get successful with. Unless they become very aggressive again and deploy KYC in games. You think?

Also in Cointelegraph https://cointelegraph.com/news/microsoft-s-massive-metaverse-move-buying-activision-for-69b

I do not like this at all, I like Activision and some of their games, it is obvious that for the short term this is a move by Microsoft to enlarge the games they offer on the xbox and for pc gaming, however I was not really aware that Activision was a large player on the metaverse, are they really that important for Microsoft to buy them for such a huge sum of money instead of developing their own tech?

Gozie51

hero member

Activity: 2660

Merit: 630

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on January 19, 2022, 02:31:45 PM

I'm pretty sure that Microsoft doesn't care about Metaverse beyond occasional opportunities for positive press-releases.

I think Microsoft is just there for the business hype and wanting to catch up with the market groove to push there name that seem to be less heard lately. It is just a name and hype that I see just with Facebook trying to build a brand with metaverse.

el kaka22

legendary

Activity: 3752

Merit: 1170

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Microsoft doesn't really "kill" everything they touch, they just have bad acquisition periods. Yahoo never had a chance to survive anyway, if it was bought by some other company or if it was still owned by the same people, do you think it would worth billions upon billions right now? I do not think so, they are mainly an email company, that is what they are most known for, and they have some other stuff that can be replaced very easily by other companies.

Skype was good, especially during this period of covid I am sure they saw some increase in usage but even with that the competition was better and most people used Zoom instead. So these companies had a lot better competition and they never really should have been bought for that much. Activision is different, they are a huge company and even the world of warcraft alone is great, even today if you asked me which mmorpg is better, after nearly 20 years, there are still no better ones. So, that kind of makes sense.

Fortify

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 1192

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

Quote

REDMOND, Wash. and Santa Monica, Calif. – Jan. 18, 2022 – With three billion people actively playing games today, and fueled by a new generation steeped in the joys of interactive entertainment, gaming is now the largest and fastest-growing form of entertainment. Today, Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) announced plans to acquire Activision Blizzard Inc. (Nasdaq: ATVI), a leader in game development and interactive entertainment content publisher. This acquisition will accelerate the growth in Microsoft’s gaming business across mobile, PC, console and cloud and will provide building blocks for the metaverse.

from: https://news.microsoft.com/2022/01/18/microsoft-to-acquire-activision-blizzard-to-bring-the-joy-and-community-of-gaming-to-everyone-across-every-device/

This is the most expensive acquisition of Microsoft since time and we can't help speculating how much the metaverse tokens will be when Mircrosoft finally launch thier own in the metaverse. There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

But with this Activision + Metaverse, I think this is going to be a good decision for them to develop. Activision has lots of games where gamers are actively playing and the Metaverse which we can consider to be the future. This might just be one of Microsoft's best investments and projects to develop and get successful with. Unless they become very aggressive again and deploy KYC in games. You think?

Also in Cointelegraph https://cointelegraph.com/news/microsoft-s-massive-metaverse-move-buying-activision-for-69b

It's a good move for Microsoft, when a company gets to their size and has so much spare cash floating around it's hard to make your profits go up substantially unless you go for a big acquisition like this. Similar to Warren Buffett saying it is hard for him to buy companies that a big enough to make much impact now it has grown to such a huge size. They seem to make a logical pair, the only downside for consumers is it will make certain titles x-box and PC only - you'll see certain titles less on devices like Apple and Playstation in future unless Microsoft is feeling particularly altruistic. Maybe it is a play for the "metaverse" but that seems like such a gimmicky concept that has been tried many times in the past and is hard to see a decent return on.

pealr12

hero member

Activity: 1946

Merit: 502

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 19, 2022, 02:20:00 PM

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

The Linux community is a pretty fractured one if I've heard right, and even if it wasn't I wouldn't treat their opinion about this merger as a Nostradamus-type prediction.

What I do know is that Microsoft wants its hands in everything (which it almost does already) and that they don't give two shits about anyone's privacy--that's the part I care about most. Having been a long-time Windows user, it's disturbing how much information they attempt to gather, and if I were just a little bit more computer savvy I'd be in that Linux community myself.

Assuming MSFT is allowed to go through with the merger I have a hard time believing they'll just take a hands-off approach and let Activision-Blizzard continue as it was. No doubt they'll make some radical changes for the worse, though I have no idea yet what they'll look like. They are a ruthless company that doesn't mind breaking the law to get what they want, so if I was a gamer (which I'm not) I'd be very careful about what games I buy if and when MSFT gains control of Activision-Blizzard. Too bad a lot of gamers don't care about privacy, especially younger ones.

It is not everything you do you must use your real identity, i don't know if playing games this days now require kyc otherwise why worry so much about privacy! am not a hardcore gamer but most of the few games i have played has always been on false identity, i don't feel it is necessary to give my real identity when i can register with fake identity, perhaps i haven't come across such games that require real identity to play.

hatshepsut93

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 2162

"Metaverse" is just a marketing buzzword used by Facebook, if you are posting about it, you are just helping Facebook raise their stock value. It's no longer cool for a tech company to say that they are working on blockchain technology, because blockchain technology is old news, but Metaverse and NFT is a brand new hype.

I'm pretty sure that Microsoft doesn't care about Metaverse beyond occasional opportunities for positive press-releases.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 7011

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: bittraffic on January 18, 2022, 10:05:18 PM

There is an impression in the Linux community where everything that Microsoft touch dies like Yahoo and Skype. Will Activision die too?

The Linux community is a pretty fractured one if I've heard right, and even if it wasn't I wouldn't treat their opinion about this merger as a Nostradamus-type prediction.

What I do know is that Microsoft wants its hands in everything (which it almost does already) and that they don't give two shits about anyone's privacy--that's the part I care about most. Having been a long-time Windows user, it's disturbing how much information they attempt to gather, and if I were just a little bit more computer savvy I'd be in that Linux community myself.

Assuming MSFT is allowed to go through with the merger I have a hard time believing they'll just take a hands-off approach and let Activision-Blizzard continue as it was. No doubt they'll make some radical changes for the worse, though I have no idea yet what they'll look like. They are a ruthless company that doesn't mind breaking the law to get what they want, so if I was a gamer (which I'm not) I'd be very careful about what games I buy if and when MSFT gains control of Activision-Blizzard. Too bad a lot of gamers don't care about privacy, especially younger ones.

boyptc

hero member

Activity: 3024

Merit: 680

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

When I've seen this news, it never clicked to my mind about Metaverse. It's just the usual and casual company acquisition that's happening with these bigger companies.

What I'm hoping for is that Microsoft won't change any policy and the way of the current management of Activision does. It's more of that acquisition is just about the shares and let them just do their thing so it won't die gradually just as the common belief that everyone sees with their acquisitions.

Topic: Microsoft to acquire Activision for $69B is all about Metaverse (Read 237 times)