Pages:
Author

Topic: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’ - page 51. (Read 19150 times)

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Another month end, another buy from MicroStrategy:



https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1366375915559792640?s=20

I guess we must get accustomed at this kind of announcement, as they made clear they are going to pour any cash Flow into their Bitcoin Stash on a monthly basis (look announcement number 6.






legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I was very surprise about the amount of money MicroStrategy keeps committing into Bitcoin, I don't know who is helping them to do their trading but buying around this price shows something, they know the price can still go very high or they believe that their business model won't give the profit they get from Bitcoin. What I was told was that Institutional investors don't buy the top but they way things are now, they are likely to buy the top in this market


I think that you are saying it wrong.

Sure it is possible that Microstrategy (and Saylor) are considering that BTC will make them money, but the most solid rationale that Saylor has used has been to describe bitcoin as losing value more slowly than any other asset... so perhaps, merely two sides of the same coin, even though I do consider such rationale differences to be important because there are reasons NOT to be holding dollars because you do not want your value to be losing relative to other assets.. but then holding bitcoin could be a bet that it will lose less than the dollar (at minimum) but also that it will likely end up appreciating greater than the dollar and greater than other assets (even though you do not necessarily need the latter part because not losing value as fast as the dollar can be a sufficient enough rational to at least put a decent percentage of your liquid holdings into bitcoin rather than keeping them in the dollar).
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Price goes up and price goes down, so what about buying on dips?

I was actually referring to the fact that whenever MS announces the purchase of BTC, the price drops significantly as has been the case now.  If someone says they are going to invest over $1 billion in BTC it should have a positive effect on the market, I find it strange that the exact opposite is happening.

You are correct to clarify that matter, because surely I had read your statement to be the opposite - as if MS was timing their purchases (or announcements) to be at the bottom, but still I believe my point is still pretty damned similar in that I consider those kinds of short term BTC price moves to BIG SO FUCKING WHAT's, even though sometimes we might want to consider that a bunch of bullish news should have bullish effects on BTC prices.

If you look at my post history, I frequently proclaim to have hardly any clues about short term BTC price prediction directions and I am frequently critical of either persons attempting to proclaim that they know the BTC price direction or those who try to suggest either narrow explanations for BTC's price movements or to overly suggest manipulation when frequently we are within reasonable parameters of normal BTC price movements.

In our current situation, BTC price can go in either direction.,. and who knows or who cares might be the considerations of longer term BTC HODLers and sat stackers.  Accordingly, we had mostly UPpity BTC price movement since early September 2020, and sure we might suggest that January was a decently sized correction in terms of both quantity of correction and duration from $42k to slightly sub $30k, and sure maybe we might also consider our current BTC price correction from $58,354 to $44,846 to be significant, even though it has ONLY lasted about 4 days, so far.

I guess my point remains that BTC price movements need NOT be explained by merely a few events or news, and even with bullish happenings and ongoing BTC UPpity price pressures, there may well be some powerful folks who are working on the other end of such price pressures because very often there can be decent amounts of advantages to concretely cause the BTC price to go in the opposite direction of expectations, at least in the short term, and whether such short term movements are sustainable or create momentum in that direction does seem to be a question of a variety of factors and many of us might neither know what resources are being thrown at the matter or be sure which way the BTC price is going to go in the short term, even if we have our own theories regarding what is happening, why it is happening and what price pressures might end up prevailing - even if we are merely assigning probabilities that skew a 50/50 assessment in one direction or another.


Regarding coinbase saving MS several million dollars, there is likely not an issue with that, whether it was waiving or lowering fees for a real BIG player.. seems normal kinds of business practices to attempt to attract BIGGER players.

Let's not go into conspiracy theories and assume what a company like Coinbase can or can't do - if we accept that all participants in the process play by the rules, that's probably the easiest way - we can't prove anything anyway.

I thought that you were leaning on conspiracy theories and that I was somewhat suggesting that it is likely normal that exchanges are going to court some of the bigger players... I could give few shits either way in terms of the details of such an arrangement.. and sure, I was not even intending to presume any laws were broken or even moral standards, even though my earlier response to you was presuming that you were making those kinds of assertions about the relationship between CB and MS.

Yes.. Saylor offered to help Musk in buying BTC.. and Musk seems to have agreed, but Musk is his own man, too.. so I doubt that Saylor can tell Musk how to tweet or the extent to which Musk should troll tweet or whatever Musk does with his tweets.

Since Saylor helped Musk make almost $1 billion in a very short time, I guess a friend can return the favor and shake up the market a bit Smiley

Look who is going into conspiracy theories.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Musk is a very strange person, and when you look at the history of his tweets it's hard to tell what's going on in his head at some point

I cannot really argue with you in regards to such overall conclusion that Musk does act pretty strange sometimes... maybe even frequently?

- because how do you explain that a man who invests $1.5 billion in BTC says he thinks the price of that same BTC is too high...

I don't know.  does not really matter too much to me because I don't really buy into various single factor theories in regards to BTC price movements, and if there might happen to be some dominant explanations, then frequently there are other factors going on behind the scenes, as well, that likely contribute to BTC price moves.  For example, there may already be momentum or loss of momentum and then some announcement might merely end up exacerbating an existing condition by either making the price move happen sooner or to happen greater than it might otherwise happen, but in the end, it still remains a BIG SO FUCKING WHAT?, at least in terms of trying not to be razzled by short term BTC price moves. 

Personally, I believe that one of the ways to be a whole hell of a lot less razzled by short term BTC price moves or even NOT to be bothered when BTC price moves way farther and lasts way longer than expected is to attempt to take advantage of such moves by letting the BTC price come to you and to buy on the way down and sell on the way up... sure easier said than done because, also in my opinion, you better make sure that you have established your BTC position quite well before you start fucking around with selling any BTC in order to try to accumulate more, so until you actually accumulate a decent BTC position, you likely ONLY employ one end of the formula which is buying on the way down, buying regularly and HODLing when you run out of money to buy.. and maybe if the BTC price stays down after you had already run out of money, you then go earn more money or wait for your cash to come in so you can buy more and continue to buy more.. whether on dips or merely just buying regularly until you reach your BTC accumulation goals.. .. so personally, I believe that those are ways to attempt to deal with stresses about short term BTC price movements by trying to create and maintain systems that you personally feel that you are advantaging yourself to the best of your abilities and thinking somewhat long term in the whole scheme of things. 

Some people are in a position in life in terms of wealth, cashflow etc. to reach their BTC accumulation goals in a year or less, and others have to take years, maybe even 10 to 20 years, depending on various personal circumstances to reach such reasonable and personally tailored BTC accumulation goals.
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
i mean, that makes sense.  I hope they aren't betting people's pensions on that.  There is an ETF in canada now, they should all dump their proxy-btc stocks for it
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
This convertible bond offering is absolutely insane.  Don't know how else to put it.  I don't get people who buy it.  Imagine bitcoin crashes, all you have is an unsecured debt of some company that committed accounting fraud in the 90s, or converted into shares of such a company.  I'd rather just own bitcoin no ?

I tried to figure out here on this post.

Not every treasurer is able to get long bitcoin, yet. Instead they can get long any crap ISIN code, as it is allowed by your investment mandate.
This is a stupid consequence of the SEC not approving a proper Bitcoin ETF.
hero member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 574
...I thought BTC would be corrected yesterday so that it can be bought at a cheap price.  It was only for a moment.
If MicroStrategy and other institutional Investors continue to buy Bitcoin in thousands like they are doing atm, prolly the price as things stand at the moment could be considered 'cheap' in relation to what the price could be in as many months. I think that's the very reason why MSG and other investors are harnessing every little opportunity that presents itself via corrections in price to acquire more Bitcoins and add to their stash, we could have a somewhat unbelievable BTC price come the end of the year, I think hodl and accumulating more during a correction is absolutely worth it.

Yes, I think it will be like that, if waiting for a deep correction and a relatively affordable price is again impossible.  Yesterday was the perfect moment to buy at a low price.  Because today BTC has touched 51k USD again.  I am even more confused when a major correction occurs whether the current price is really a stable price.
hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 530
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
I was very surprise about the amount of money MicroStrategy keeps committing into Bitcoin, I don't know who is helping them to do their trading but buying around this price shows something, they know the price can still go very high or they believe that their business model won't give the profit they get from Bitcoin. What I was told was that Institutional investors don't buy the top but they way things are now, they are likely to buy the top in this market
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
Price goes up and price goes down, so what about buying on dips?

I was actually referring to the fact that whenever MS announces the purchase of BTC, the price drops significantly as has been the case now.  If someone says they are going to invest over $1 billion in BTC it should have a positive effect on the market, I find it strange that the exact opposite is happening.

Regarding coinbase saving MS several million dollars, there is likely not an issue with that, whether it was waiving or lowering fees for a real BIG player.. seems normal kinds of business practices to attempt to attract BIGGER players.

Let's not go into conspiracy theories and assume what a company like Coinbase can or can't do - if we accept that all participants in the process play by the rules, that's probably the easiest way - we can't prove anything anyway.

Yes.. Saylor offered to help Musk in buying BTC.. and Musk seems to have agreed, but Musk is his own man, too.. so I doubt that Saylor can tell Musk how to tweet or the extent to which Musk should troll tweet or whatever Musk does with his tweets.

Since Saylor helped Musk make almost $1 billion in a very short time, I guess a friend can return the favor and shake up the market a bit Smiley Musk is a very strange person, and when you look at the history of his tweets it's hard to tell what's going on in his head at some point - because how do you explain that a man who invests $1.5 billion in BTC says he thinks the price of that same BTC is too high...
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Interesting how MicroStrategy always (or so it seems to me) invests in BTC when a correction occurs - I wonder if there are any behind-the-scenes games, given that Coinbase boasted in the past how they save MS several million dollars?

Price goes up and price goes down, so what about buying on dips?

Regarding coinbase saving MS several million dollars, there is likely not an issue with that, whether it was waiving or lowering fees for a real BIG player.. seems normal kinds of business practices to attempt to attract BIGGER players.



Who knows, maybe Musk and Saylor are working together now - at least the tweets are free to post Wink

Yes.. Saylor offered to help Musk in buying BTC.. and Musk seems to have agreed, but Musk is his own man, too.. so I doubt that Saylor can tell Musk how to tweet or the extent to which Musk should troll tweet or whatever Musk does with his tweets.

I'm just wondering if there's any amount of BTC that will satisfy Michael Saylor at some point, so he'll say the mission is done - given that it has quite approached the amount of as much as 100 000 BTC which is a very nice round figure, at least when it comes to calculating how much all the BTC is worth at some point Smiley

Saylor seems to be inclined to continue to use cashflow to buy BTC.. so whether he uses 100% of cashflow plus leverage or modifies his purchases to something more "reasonable," Saylor does not seem to have that kind of personality... so maybe when BTC price goes up, he might cut back a bit on his acquisitions in terms of recognizing the short term unsustainability of the price, but Saylor seems to be a bit more bullish than a lot of us regular bulls - even accounting for the relativity of his cashflow.. .. but maybe he is not much different from Elwar in 2016 when Elwar sold his house and used the proceeds to buy bitcoin.. Elwar seemed a bit nutso to many of us, but it still payed off quite well... One of the thing that differentiates Saylor is that Saylor has ongoing cashflow that may not be able to completely replace either the bitcoin purchases that he made or the leveraging that he has done along the way, but Saylor should be able to service the various debts without a problem from existing cashflow - absent his company going to shit in terms of cashflow - which can never be ruled out completely.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
...I thought BTC would be corrected yesterday so that it can be bought at a cheap price.  It was only for a moment.
If MicroStrategy and other institutional Investors continue to buy Bitcoin in thousands like they are doing atm, prolly the price as things stand at the moment could be considered 'cheap' in relation to what the price could be in as many months. I think that's the very reason why MSG and other investors are harnessing every little opportunity that presents itself via corrections in price to acquire more Bitcoins and add to their stash, we could have a somewhat unbelievable BTC price come the end of the year, I think hodl and accumulating more during a correction is absolutely worth it.
hero member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 574
Interesting how MicroStrategy always (or so it seems to me) invests in BTC when a correction occurs - I wonder if there are any behind-the-scenes games, given that Coinbase boasted in the past how they save MS several million dollars? Who knows, maybe Musk and Saylor are working together now - at least the tweets are free to post Wink

It seemed plausible that they were working together on their investment in Crypto.  At a very high price, the microstrategy buys BTC and makes the market go up again.  What's the reason?  the movements of these rich people make me confused as a dime player. The price of BTC during this year has multiplied many times and is going to the moon.  Until I couldn't afford it, huft I thought BTC would be corrected yesterday so that it can be bought at a cheap price.  It was only for a moment.
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
Interesting how MicroStrategy always (or so it seems to me) invests in BTC when a correction occurs - I wonder if there are any behind-the-scenes games, given that Coinbase boasted in the past how they save MS several million dollars? Who knows, maybe Musk and Saylor are working together now - at least the tweets are free to post Wink

I'm just wondering if there's any amount of BTC that will satisfy Michael Saylor at some point, so he'll say the mission is done - given that it has quite approached the amount of as much as 100 000 BTC which is a very nice round figure, at least when it comes to calculating how much all the BTC is worth at some point Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
This convertible bond offering is absolutely insane.  Don't know how else to put it.  I don't get people who buy it.  Imagine bitcoin crashes, all you have is an unsecured debt of some company that committed accounting fraud in the 90s, or converted into shares of such a company.  I'd rather just own bitcoin no ?
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Microstrategy bought the Bitcoin with the proceeds of their last bond sales:



https://twitter.com/michael_saylor/status/1364561973363490817?s=21


Link to official Statement:
MicroStrategy Acquires Additional 19,452 Bitcoins for $1.026 Billion

Quote
TYSONS CORNER, Va., February 24, 2021-- MicroStrategy® Incorporated (Nasdaq: MSTR) (the “Company”), the largest independent publicly-traded business intelligence company, today announced that it had purchased an additional approximately 19,452 bitcoins for approximately $1.026 billion in cash at an average price of approximately $52,765 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses.

As of February 24, 2021, the Company holds an aggregate of approximately 90,531 bitcoins, which were acquired at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $2.171 billion and an average purchase price of approximately $23,985 per bitcoin, inclusive of fees and expenses.



Another 19,000 Bitcoin in the MSTR treasury!

Spreadsheet updated.

legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422

Never got a single call from him Wink
A true bitcoiner has low time preferences:
Don’t spend in silly things today, hodl, and save for later.
Try to explain bitcoin to a nocoiner, be called a fool, then being recognised right years later.
Delayed satisfactions are way better than immediate ones.
Those times are way over now, personally speaking. I don't talk bitcoin in public anymore as I've spent too much time explaining bitcoin to my masses and I realized that I had to push the IF you don't get it I don't have the time to explain it to you. The very few who listened to me now enjoy a much more relaxed life for sure  Wink
I remember specifically mentioning that I wanted to be called by him when companies would have started thinking of bitcoin in terms of reserve asset (2016).
Never got a single call from him Wink
You wanted him to call you and apologize for how stupid he was and for how smart you were in 2016.. once it was unambiguously shown...   Do people really do that?  Not too common, but some people will admit if they are confronted about how surprised they are regarding a direction that happened that was outside of their previous expectactions.
I wanted nothing from him really, I don't care Wink It was a memory that came to my mind reading fillippone's post.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11105
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
I remember specifically mentioning that I wanted to be called by him when companies would have started thinking of bitcoin in terms of reserve asset (2016).
Never got a single call from him Wink

You wanted him to call you and apologize for how stupid he was and for how smart you were in 2016.. once it was unambiguously shown...   Do people really do that?  Not too common, but some people will admit if they are confronted about how surprised they are regarding a direction that happened that was outside of their previous expectactions.

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

For many of us longer term BTC accumulators and HODLers, we might be surprised somewhat in terms of either how fast such things seem to be happening or the quantity that they are happening, but we are not really surprised in terms of it actually happening, so we do not have to change too many things in our ways of thinking.  No coiner bitcoin naysayers have to like shake their heads a few times and really attempt to reset their framework, if they are being honest with themselves.  We have a lot of them still acting like retards and resorting to stupid-ass frameworks of describing bitcoin as a bubble and overly priced and proclaiming weird anomalies including putting Elon and Michael into such categories...

Those kinds of ongoing nocoiner  naysayers are going to continue to get screwed because they are likely to get front-run the fuck out of in terms of failing/refusing to take some kind of "what-if?" stake in bitcoin that might protect them way better than sitting back, waiting and seeing without taking any stake in bitcoin.  Difficult to protect people from themselves, even if you may well be open to sharing information with them, many still continue in their reluctancies to act in any kind of meaningful way to establishing a bitcoin stake.. even if it could take them 5 years or more of DCA, buying on dips and a combination to build such meaningful stake.

I trade every day in more than 4 exchanges regularly for the last 3-4 years now, so "selling" and "buying" is my routine and I believe that if you are focused and not impulsive, you will benefit a lot more over time.

These statements seem to contradict or to be in tension with your earlier statements about not selling any BTC until they are equal to $1million to one satoshi.. and sure maybe there are some framing and context issues, but I find some of these assertions  to be a wee bit confusing, mostly because they seem to be contradicting one another to some degree.

I don't find my statements contradict between them. To trade BTC, meaning that you have to sell at some point and then rebuy to get profit,

Of course, depends on your stash, but I certainly do not consider selling BTC as a means to buy back at a cheaper price in order to get more BTC - even though I do end up buying back at a cheaper price on a  regular basis, but overall, especially when BTC goes from a run from $10k to $57k for example, it seems to be best to have a selling of BTC methodology that allows you to NOT give any shits about if the BTC price goes back down or NOT.  Of course, if you are regretting whatever BTC that you sold on the way from $10k to $57k for example, then you were neither financially nor psychologically prepared for such BTC sales and you should not have done them.


don't block me from having an amount locked until I die (since this is certain to happen before BTC hit $800mil...)

Is it really necessary to have any certain amount of BTC locked?  Let's say for example in early 2016, when you registered your account in this forum, you created some BTC investment goals for yourself and you largely wanted to achieve such goals that would involve accumulated BTC and reaching accumulation targets by the end of 2016 or early 2017.

I have no idea of your personal circumstances, but since BTC is quite volatile (and has shown itself through its history to be quite volatile), you may have reached your BTC accumulation targets by early 2017, but still continued to invest in BTC and buy on dips and various kinds of ongoing BTC accumulation that ends up causing you to have become somewhat overinvested in BTC by mid -2020 (before our current exponential BTC price rise and also before Michael Saylor figured out bitcoin.. hahahahhahaha)..

so, yeah, with more than a 4-year investment timeline that ended up proceeding someone like Michael Saylor (who you did not really have any clue over those previous 4 years that such a character would come on the BTC scene, even though it surely was NOT out of the realms of possible expectations of something that could have happened), you could have ended up being somewhat over invested in BTC and also the facts of the matter would have ended up being that you front run folks like Michael Saylor and the other BIGGER player types who are quite likely (we already see a lot of evidence of this) going to be coming into the BTC space in the coming years.

So then part of my point is that in a scenario of your having had over-invested in BTC (which sure I understand that it might not have ended up happening with you specifically but you could likely imagine scenarios in which it happened with other people in similar - or slightly different shoes from you) creates some justification to shave some BTC off along the way UPpity at various BTC price points that they may have already established in advance.


It's obvious that I was exaggerated for the $1mil per sat just to show that there is no limitation for BTC, at least for me. Smiley


One of the better ways to tell a joke is to say it with a straight face even when exaggerating, but we still have to take some of your ideas somewhat literal, too.. and never selling BTC does not seem realistic, especially for anyone who may have been purposefully accumulating along the way, and there comes a point in which selling some will make way more sense than hoarding it... but hey.. plan what you like and do what you like... but we are still in a public thread, and for that reason, it seems prudent for guys like me to respond and suggest how silly, impractical and just weird such a position would be for the vast majority of normies, and even more weird for any kind of normie who had accumulated a decent amount of BTC stash way before the BTC price reaches $1million per satoshi, even presuming that such a price were reachable in our lifetimes..


Now please don’t derail this thread too much!

You are right and my apologies about it. Cool

I'm willing to try to get back on track, too.  Sorry if I exacerbated the deviation from this topic, in some of the discussions about what personally to do or personal BTC portfolio management considerations, too. even though tangentially, where the price might go does also relate to actions like Michael Saylor/Microstrategies and the possible contagiousness of such BIG PLAYER strategies in terms of how those strategies might affect personal strategies and how to manage your BTC portfolio based on such strategies of BIGGER players.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1104
This is what I do. I drink and I know things.
I trade every day in more than 4 exchanges regularly for the last 3-4 years now, so "selling" and "buying" is my routine and I believe that if you are focused and not impulsive, you will benefit a lot more over time.

These statements seem to contradict or to be in tension with your earlier statements about not selling any BTC until they are equal to $1million to one satoshi.. and sure maybe there are some framing and context issues, but I find some of these assertions  to be a wee bit confusing, mostly because they seem to be contradicting one another to some degree.

I don't find my statements contradict between them. To trade BTC, meaning that you have to sell at some point and then rebuy to get profit, don't block me from having an amount locked until I die (since this is certain to happen before BTC hit $800mil...) It's obvious that I was exaggerated for the $1mil per sat just to show that there is no limitation for BTC, at least for me. Smiley


So for sure one satoshi can get to one million dollars, but I guess this would imply:
  • a hyperinflation in dollars, so if one satoshi is ne million dollars, how much would cost a liter of milk? I guess many billions dollars to say the least.
  • following an hyperinflation for practical reason there is a redejonination in the currency, slashing a few zeros. For this you will never get to an actual quote of one million dollar per satoshi in current money (‘at be expressed in today’s money).

Doesn't have to be hyperinflation for something to have a crazy price in order to get it nor to drag other products with it. So theoretically speaking, if tomorrow the next sell order in any exchange is $8mil or 10 - 20 and so on, then anyone that wants to buy will have to pay $8mil. Simple as that. Smiley (I know that this sounds like a sci-fi movie scenario but... who knows? Grin )

Delayed satisfactions are way better than immediate ones.

+1mil on this!

Now please don’t derail this thread too much!

You are right and my apologies about it. Cool
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23

Never got a single call from him Wink
A true bitcoiner has low time preferences:
Don’t spend in silly things today, hodl, and save for later.
Try to explain bitcoin to a nocoiner, be called a fool, then being recognised right years later.
Delayed satisfactions are way better than immediate ones.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1422
Apparently, they completed the sale of their convertible bond:

Please note that they allocated 14 days to perform the sale, but only one day was enough.

This could explain the price action, either or they already bought 1.05 Billion, or they are going to buy this soon!

I don't know if this got explained well but we are talking about some billions (B) $ buys at market prices, insane to say to least. I mean who'd have thought that, say, 5 years ago.
I remember I was with a colleague of mine probably in 2016 when I was working for my previous company and I was discussing bitcoin's upside potential. I remember I kind of used what are now the main planB's points I and was labelled a fool.
I remember specifically mentioning that I wanted to be called by him when companies would have started thinking of bitcoin in terms of reserve asset (2016).
Never got a single call from him Wink
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
P.S: I will still HODL BTC until 1 sat is equal to $1mil... Tongue Grin

Of course, seems a bit much from my perspective, but I have already said my piece about that way of framing the matter.  

I will have my two cents in this very OT statement.
When it was designed Satoshi and Hal had in mind that if ever BTC went to one million dollar, then a satoshi would be one cent, the minimum needed unit of account.
So for sure one satoshi can get to one million dollars, but I guess this would imply:
  • a hyperinflation in dollars, so if one satoshi is ne million dollars, how much would cost a liter of milk? I guess many billions dollars to say the least.
  • following an hyperinflation for practical reason there is a redejonination in the currency, slashing a few zeros. For this you will never get to an actual quote of one million dollar per satoshi in current money (‘at be expressed in today’s money).

Now please don’t derail this thread too much!
Pages:
Jump to: