Pages:
Author

Topic: Mike Hearn still holding Bitcoin. - page 2. (Read 1478 times)

hero member
Activity: 3150
Merit: 937
August 12, 2017, 07:03:02 AM
#4
Why should we care about Mike Hearn having or not having Bitcoins?
I understand that those transactions between Satoshi Nakamoto and Mike Hearn must be very important in
the Bitcoin history,but why should we argue about this?
I`m curious about the bitcoin value back in April 2009.Some forum member here said that bitcoin was free back then.Too sad that i haven`t had a PC and didn`t knew anything about BTC. Sad
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
August 12, 2017, 03:50:58 AM
#3
All the usual FUDers attacking Mike in the past got it wrong.

Mike said he had sold all his coins. If these emails are legit they show he wasn't telling the truth about that. It was Mike who "got it wrong", not "The FUDers".

Curiously why did Satoshi Nakamoto sent 50 BTC on 18th April (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh. Think about it, Satoshi Nakamoto could have used an earlier block from January when he was mining almost alone. Satoshi Nakamoto picked the address from 23rd February 2009 which was almost mined 2 months prior. Did Satoshi Nakamoto not mine any blocks after 23rd February or did he just randomly pick that address?

Presumably he asked his wallet to send 50 BTC and the wallet's coin selection algorithm picked which utxo to spend. "Coin control" wasn't a thing back then.

Do you think Satoshi would have mined all the coins in one wallet or 1 block per wallet? Having more than 1 wallet would be sensible in terms of spreading risks.

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
August 12, 2017, 03:04:13 AM
#2
All the usual FUDers attacking Mike in the past got it wrong.

Mike said he had sold all his coins. If these emails are legit they show he wasn't telling the truth about that. It was Mike who "got it wrong", not "The FUDers".

Curiously why did Satoshi Nakamoto sent 50 BTC on 18th April (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh. Think about it, Satoshi Nakamoto could have used an earlier block from January when he was mining almost alone. Satoshi Nakamoto picked the address from 23rd February 2009 which was almost mined 2 months prior. Did Satoshi Nakamoto not mine any blocks after 23rd February or did he just randomly pick that address?

Presumably he asked his wallet to send 50 BTC and the wallet's coin selection algorithm picked which utxo to spend. "Coin control" wasn't a thing back then.
legendary
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
August 11, 2017, 03:19:49 PM
#1
Look at this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2080206.0;all

Look at this https://pastebin.com/Na5FwkQ4

Whilst reading the emails, assuming they are not fakes, I'd spotted this?

In chronological order.

23-2-2009 10:05:15 Reward From Block 5326 mined by Satoshi Nakamoto. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh.

14-4-2009 7:41 PM Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "If you send to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu and e-mail me your bitcoin address, or IP if you can accept incoming connections, I'll send back the same amount +50" to Mike Hearn.

16-4-2009 13:04:58 Reward From Block 11157 mined by Mike Hearn. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.

16-4-2009 16:33:26 Reward From Block 11173 mined by Mike Hearn. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o.

18-4-2009 13:08:22 Included In Blocks 11395 Mike Hearn sent 32.51 BTC to Satoshi Nakamoto. 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 15:08 Mike Hearn emailed, "I sent you 32.51 coins, my bitcoin address is 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 15:55:19 Included In Blocks 11408 Satoshi Nakamoto sent 32.51 BTC back to Mike Hearn. 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n. Satoshi Nakamoto also sent 50 BTC (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh to 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n.

18-4-2009 18:16 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "I sent back 32.51 and 50.00" to Mike Hearn.

18-4-2009 19:34:27 Included In Blocks 11426 Mike Hearn sent 50 BTC (mined 16-4-2009 16:33:26) back to Satoshi Nakamoto. 16LukCKiiraP5iDT8X4ZgDGufq7L4dtg6o to 1PhUXucRd8FzQved2KGK3g1eKfTHPGjgFu.

18-4-2009 21:25 Mike Hearn emailed, "Thanks. I sent you back 50, so now we're even" to Satoshi Nakamoto.

18-4-2009 22:52 Satoshi Nakamoto emailed, "Got the 50" to Mike Hearn.

This proves that Mike Hearn still has 81.51 BTC at 1JuEjh9znXwqsy5RrnKqgzqY4Ldg7rnj5n plus 17.49 BTC at 151FzoGsL4XiswSCpMBmii41WL9b6uweNg.

https://blog.plan99.net/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7#.r5kbauxsn
"I will no longer be taking part in Bitcoin development and have sold all my coins."

https://cointelegraph.com/news/how-mike-hearn-sold-all-his-bitcoins-in-2016-and-market-proved-him-wrong
Terrible article since Mike still has at least 100 BTC.

All the usual FUDers attacking Mike in the past got it wrong.

Curiously why did Satoshi Nakamoto sent 50 BTC on 18th April (mined 23-2-2009 10:05:15) to Mike Hearn. 1AfRNhdvL5zYL1FTxM9mHyYnHuHK4TpLYh. Think about it, Satoshi Nakamoto could have used an earlier block from January when he was mining almost alone. Satoshi Nakamoto picked the address from 23rd February 2009 which was almost mined 2 months prior. Did Satoshi Nakamoto not mine any blocks after 23rd February or did he just randomly pick that address?
Pages:
Jump to: