Before you talk nonsense, you first need to think and study the market. don't forget to call a scam let's say ZClassic, which fell 99.41%, well, and other hundreds of coins that fell more than minexcoin (-96.39%). But I guess what a troll's meager brain could be ..
https://athcoinindex.com/marketcap/page/allIf someone is talking nonsenses it is paid MINEX/Republia trolls like you. Mine facts stand. Maybe you dont like it ,but that is your problem and your bosses. There are no coins with POS 70%+ rate which survived and maintained price.None. All of them was accompanied with price fall much bigger than interest rate.House always wins.
When Iam talking about coins(MNX is not simple coin,but token,more similar to classic share then coin) not at one coin with huge interest rate and which had such massive 98% per year prolonged fall ever recovered.None of them.Minex coin failed,because Minex failed as a company ,not to due bear market. But one troll like you cant ant wont to know that. It is repeating everything is fine,when everything falling apart.
It's very funny when such a typical troll as you call me a troll. For stupid, I can write who the troll is and I can draw an analogy with your posts that you clone several times and in different topics. I will no longer talk about your violation of forum rules, since your messages are usually offtopic and trolling, as well as plagiarism and change, distortion of information taken from Internet sources (caricatures on photos, etc.)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/unofficial-list-of-official-bitcointalkorg-rules-guidelines-faq-703657 The troll is engaged in placing provocative messages on virtual communication resources in order to whip up a conflict situation by violating the rules of the ethical code of Internet interaction. The closest concepts of a troll are temptation, provocation and incitement — that is, a conscious deception, slander, incitement of quarrels and strife, a call for unseemly actions.
P.S. No matter how much you want and squeal that mainexcoin fails, it will not happen at your will. All your arguments will soon collapse.
And the frame from the video that you love to show so much is just a concept of price movement and an explanation of the work of bank interest rates. No one ever said that the course will necessarily be such, and this was assumed only from the then market situation.
You do not have brains or can not think? What kind of lie do I trade? I lie, that I participate in the company of the bounty, or are you lying now, that I am trading false?
What proof do you have of my lie?
Perhaps my subtle humor failed when I wrote a message (note that I did not write to you, but to that troll), so I don’t know English well. But I wrote intentionally that this troll would not make himself a saint.
And now you work as a troll instead? To continue to troll my messages?
It doesn't even surprise me. You all climb out of the ground.
You certainly know enough English to shill Republia when it suits you. Plus you are wearing the "Republia ambassador tag" in your profile and the Republia signature. Adding all these facts together, coupled with you trying to bury all the posts about the scammy nature of Republia, plus your own written admission that you are now somehow trying to pass off as an attempt to troll, i'd say, the chances that you are indeed a paid shill are very high.
So please spare me your drivel.
About MNX intereset rate. Every person with a some knowledge of economy can tell you what will happen when somebody offering 70+% interest. Just imagine that some central bank does it - it is prelude to uncontrolable hyperinflation.
Minex and all other ICOs were doomed with SEC decision last week. SEC looks on the ICOs as a fradulent operations and wants to cease them all. Becaus ICOs will have to repay theirs investors they will certainly drop prices of theirs tokens as much as possible,so they repay investors as little as possible.And Minex is not exception.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2018-264FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2018-264
Washington D.C., Nov. 16, 2018 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against two companies that sold digital tokens in initial coin offerings (ICOs). These are the Commission’s first cases imposing civil penalties solely for ICO securities offering registration violations.
Both companies have agreed to return funds to harmed investors, register the tokens as securities, file periodic reports with the Commission, and pay penalties.According to the SEC’s orders, both CarrierEQ Inc. (Airfox) and Paragon Coin Inc. conducted ICOs in 2017 after the Commission warned that ICOs can be securities offerings in its DAO Report of Investigation. Airfox, a Boston-based startup, raised approximately $15 million worth of digital assets to finance its development of a token-denominated “ecosystem” starting with a mobile application that would allow users in emerging markets to earn tokens and exchange them for data by interacting with advertisements. Paragon, an online entity, raised approximately $12 million worth of digital assets to develop and implement its business plan to add blockchain technology to the cannabis industry and work toward legalization of cannabis. Neither Airfox nor Paragon registered their ICOs pursuant to the federal securities laws, nor did they qualify for an exemption to the registration requirements.
“We have made it clear that companies that issue securities through ICOs are required to comply with existing statutes and rules governing the registration of securities,” said Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division. “These cases tell those who are considering taking similar actions that we continue to be on the lookout for violations of the federal securities laws with respect to digital assets.”
“By providing investors who purchased securities in these ICOs with the opportunity to be reimbursed and having the issuers register their tokens with the SEC, these orders provide a model for companies that have issued tokens in ICOs and seek to comply with the federal securities laws,” said Steven Peikin, Co-Director of the SEC’s Enforcement Division.
Today’s cases follow the Commission’s first non-fraud ICO registration case, Munchee, Inc. The Commission did not impose a penalty or include undertakings from Munchee, which stopped its offering before delivering any tokens and promptly returned proceeds to investors.
The orders impose $250,000 penalties against each company and include undertakings to compensate harmed investors who purchased tokens in the illegal offerings. The companies also will register their tokens as securities pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and file periodic reports with the Commission for at least one year. Airfox and Paragon consented to the orders without admitting or denying the findings.
The investigation into Paragon was conducted by Pamela Sawhney of the Enforcement Division’s Cyber Unit and was supervised by Robert A. Cohen, Chief of the Cyber Unit. The investigation into AirFox was conducted by Colin D. Forbes, Emily R. Holness, and Michael J. Vito and supervised by Celia D. Moore, Amy S. Gwiazda, and John T. Dugan of the Boston Regional Office. The SEC appreciates the assistance of the Massachusetts Securities Division.
