Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?
I haven't noticed any decrease in speed with my Nano's, neither on my 390's.
Maybe when the DAG reaches +2GB. But i doubt it..
Topic: Mining Hardware Comparison - page 2. (Read 6661 times)
I haven't noticed any decrease in speed with my Nano's, neither on my 390's.
Maybe when the DAG reaches +2GB. But i doubt it..
Does anybody notice when the DAG files become larger, the R9 390 and Nano's hash rate also decrease?
i hope they will fix that issue with the new generation of gpu for nvidia, or ethereum will remain preferabely with amd gpu, and no competition is bad, it make gpu more expensive
Thanx, I already got it
Definetly memory latency issue ... or not optimal opencl code for ethhash to use all the 4k CU's
Here is 290x doing 32-33mh for comparison
Definetly memory latency issue ... or not optimal opencl code for ethhash to use all the 4k CU's
Here is 290x doing 32-33mh for comparison
2 Eliovp
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
I could do that from one of my nano's yes. Fury not anymore, i sold those.
I'm sure a Fury can beat any hawaii card. If you OC it high enough that is
Same for Hawaii, if you run a high end hawaii card at stock clocks, and you run a fury x at stock clocks it'll go faster.
If you oc that hawaii card, it'll beat that fury. Obviously....
2 Eliovp
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
From the results, non oc fury beats non oc hawaï and oc fury is just a little bit better than oc hawaï but at a lower power.Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
Beside pure compute performance, one key point is memory latency access in eth mining + some memory cache: hbm is very good for bandwith but not so much for latency.
On nvidia side, a GTX 970 is almost as good as a GTX 980 Ti probably due to issue with memory cache or latency...
2 Eliovp
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
Could you please post gpu-z screenshot from Fury (Nano) mining etherium? Is there a memory controller load data?
How do you think what is the reason why Fury cannot beat Hawaii in ETH mining?
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks.
keep up the good work.
keep up the good work.
Will do! Thank you!
Definitely need some spare time to do some upgrades/clean up.
Future plans :p
great list, really easy to navigate, sort ,filter and compare different gpus to see which one would best fit specific tasks.
keep up the good work.
keep up the good work.
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me. You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.
Thank you very much for your kind words.
This is more valuable to me then money!
Really appreciate it! :-)
I wanted to thank the op and give him a free bump for this awesome chart (really it should be sticky'd), this has helped me tremendously on choosing a gpu that would work for me. You do have to ignore a few of those out of range scores but in general most of ratings appear to be pretty accurate and I added a old card to the list.
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
I have yes.
Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds
But if it was true. They should mention it.
Greetings
Regards
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
I have yes.
Knowing a few devs here, i'm pretty sure there isn't an optimized kernel out there that does those kind of speeds
But if it was true. They should mention it.
Greetings
Have you considered they might be running custom kernels?
I've been seeing some unrealistic entries lately.
Please keep it honest guys.
An R9 380 just cannot do 41Mh/s @ Ethereum on stock clocks. I doubt that even if it would be heavily OC'ed it wouldn't even get that high.
Same for a 390 (non x). That card just does not do 40Mh on Ethereum. I own that card myself and at those clocks i barely hit 30Mh.
So please keep it as honest as possible.
Thx
Please keep it honest guys.
An R9 380 just cannot do 41Mh/s @ Ethereum on stock clocks. I doubt that even if it would be heavily OC'ed it wouldn't even get that high.
Same for a 390 (non x). That card just does not do 40Mh on Ethereum. I own that card myself and at those clocks i barely hit 30Mh.
So please keep it as honest as possible.
Thx
Thx for everyone that has been submitting configs/cards.
We now have 170 active configs/cards.
Please keep them coming!
I will clean up as soon as i find some time to do this.
My apologies for that.
Again, keep it as honest as you can please.
It has no point of submitting configs that aren't realistic.
That doesn't help anyone.
I will do some extra modifications on the commenting system as this isn't optimal at this point.
Thx again!
Greetings!
We now have 170 active configs/cards.
Please keep them coming!
I will clean up as soon as i find some time to do this.
My apologies for that.
Again, keep it as honest as you can please.
It has no point of submitting configs that aren't realistic.
That doesn't help anyone.
I will do some extra modifications on the commenting system as this isn't optimal at this point.
Thx again!
Greetings!
Great comparison : thanks!
You're welcome.
Still have a lot on my "Todo list". But have been having it very busy lately so i pushed that little project a little to the side.
Will definitely work on it as soon as i've got some spare time.
Thx for liking it
Great comparison : thanks!
Sure I really liked your idea and this site can become very useful to the miners.
Another thing that I was thinking regarding the calculator page. If you add another field with card cost in usd, you can calculate ROI as well.
Or even better, insert this field into the "Submit your card configuration" page.
Maybe then we can sort after ROI
P.S. I know prices vary , but we can make an idea...
I really liked your idea and this site can become very useful to the miners.Another thing that I was thinking regarding the calculator page. If you add another field with card cost in usd, you can calculate ROI as well.
Or even better, insert this field into the "Submit your card configuration" page.
Maybe then we can sort after ROI
P.S. I know prices vary , but we can make an idea...
Is there a way to confirm that submitted hashrates are real? I mean, one user (alevlaslo) submitted results for a R9 390 - 38.84 MH/s!
I see that you have a "comment" box in "More info" tab, but is inactive. Maybe you should make it active so we can discuss there about the results posted.
Also, maybe you can add another field with print screen?
Thanks!
I see that you have a "comment" box in "More info" tab, but is inactive. Maybe you should make it active so we can discuss there about the results posted.
Also, maybe you can add another field with print screen?
Thanks!
Hey Crsminer, thank you for posting.
You're right. That is a bit over it. At this time i'm just relying on those who submit.
There is an option to post a screenshot. But nobody does
. I'm working with someone on something new to add. So that the inputs cannot be wrong. I'll explain this later.
That comment box is broken somehow. it "use" to work :p
I need to get into that asap.
Thx for letting me know!
I'll post back when it's fixed
(was wondering why no one posted any comments.. that explains :p)
Fixed it
Jump to: