It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Dec 26 19:54:12gmaxwell: i thought there was a driver limit of 8 gpus maximum
Dec 26 19:54:28Driver. Yup.
Dec 26 19:54:35So run multiple copies of the driver. :)
Dec 26 19:54:55(according to luke the ati drivers work in kvm with the pci remapping stuff)
Dec 26 19:55:35so in _theory_ you could start two VMs, map 4 cards to each and run 16 GPUs on a system.
Dec 26 19:55:45(presuming you could plug in that many)
Dec 26 19:55:58(and presuming your motherboard doesn't catch fire)
Dec 26 19:57:38I have been trying to find someone that has actually been able to mine successfully in a virtualized environment
Dec 26 19:57:48luke-jr:
Dec 26 19:57:52i know it ought to work
Dec 26 19:58:16gmaxwell: only with motherboards/CPUs that support it
Dec 26 19:58:44vt-d, and iommu right
Dec 26 19:58:49VT-d in my case
Dec 26 19:58:54but does it work well?
Dec 26 19:58:55stable?
Dec 26 19:58:58also, Intel pulled a big scam earlier this year
Dec 26 19:59:02because i want to try it
Dec 26 19:59:09well, my Radeon still manages to crash my host system sometimes
Dec 26 19:59:17hmm
Dec 26 19:59:25rjk2: you get diminishing returns packing more cards onto one system. ::shrugs::
Dec 26 19:59:26usually when I try to reinitialize it
Dec 26 19:59:30which is mostly playing around
Dec 26 19:59:38if I knew a proper way to do that, it might be OK
Dec 26 20:00:09what i wanted to do was use intel vt-d with built-in video powering my desktop environment, and discrete cards mining
Dec 26 20:00:23rjk2: tht's what I do
Dec 26 20:00:24z68 based
Dec 26 20:00:46luke-jr: sounds good, using kvm or xen?
Dec 26 20:01:21KVM
Dec 26 20:01:47Z68 = no VT-d
Dec 26 20:01:53wait what
Dec 26 20:02:05 * catalase_ is now known as catalase
Dec 26 20:02:08i know the K procs with overclocking don't have it
Dec 26 20:02:17but z68 doesn't either?
Dec 26 20:02:20nope
Dec 26 20:02:26http://ark.intel.com/compare/52816,52812
Dec 26 20:02:31damn it
Dec 26 20:02:37return it :P
Dec 26 20:03:13is that what "embedded options available" means? VT-d?
Dec 26 20:03:19no
Dec 26 20:03:26Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d)
Dec 26 20:03:37it's exclusive to Q67
Dec 26 20:03:38oh, i see its down lower
Dec 26 20:03:41at least for Sandy Bridge
Dec 26 20:03:45hmm
Dec 26 20:04:01originally it wasn't
Dec 26 20:04:03man that is lame
Dec 26 20:04:08but Intel bugged, and decided the solution was to fix their specs
Dec 26 20:04:20ie, they said the bug was the advertising VT-d on the others
Dec 26 20:04:31doh! that sucks.
Dec 26 20:04:34yep
Dec 26 20:04:38but they also bugged the SATA
Dec 26 20:04:46so I returned my H67 and got a Q67
Dec 26 20:04:48:D
Dec 26 20:04:53lol too true >.>
Dec 26 20:04:58though it was VERY difficult to get Q67 at the time
Dec 26 20:07:34luke-jr: have you had the opportunity to test IOMMU (AMD) systems in the same manner yet?
Dec 26 20:08:21no
Dec 26 20:08:36I think someone did though, and found they had to do 1 VM per card
Dec 26 20:08:42lolwut
Dec 26 20:08:44I've only tested 1 on VT-d
Dec 26 20:09:18the annoying thing is, if the card crashes, I pretty much have to reboot
Dec 26 20:09:33in theory, I *should* be able to 'remove' the card and power cycle just it
Dec 26 20:09:39but I haven't figured out how in practice
Dec 26 20:09:51even if I remove and rescan, it doesn't get reset
Dec 26 20:10:09upgrading fglrx *might* help
Dec 26 20:10:28since newer versions support hot-switching between IGP and discrete on laptops
Dec 26 20:10:58(the error I was getting found only Google results talking about that)
Dec 26 20:11:37latest fglrx *seems* to be working just as well as the good old 2.1 now tho
Dec 26 20:12:19ie, no CPU hogging, and full 308 MH/s
Dec 26 20:12:48I don't have a sane way to reproduce the card crashing though, so no idea how many months until I can confirm it reinitializes
Dec 26 20:12:48is that with one card?
Dec 26 20:12:51yes
Dec 26 20:13:04i built myself a mini-itx system, jsut to do that
Dec 26 20:13:04also, OpenCL is a memory hog :/
Dec 26 20:13:37rjk2: note that PCI bus, and probably PCI-E extenders, will be all-or-nothing to VMs
Dec 26 20:13:49ie, you might be unable to isolate single cards in separate VMs