Pages:
Author

Topic: mining.BitcoinAffiliatenetwork.com-0% PPS + 1 Hour (or higher) Payout Interval - page 61. (Read 83354 times)

legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001
Hope eveythings fixed soon, no payment received for a while.

Here's date of last received: August 18, 2014, at 04:23AM EDT
member
Activity: 90
Merit: 10
Meh, merely exchanging camp fire stories and roasting trolls. Wink

They taste terrible...
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
★ BitClave pre-ICO: 25/07/17 ★
So glad your final word is Gospel. Amen.

YOU brought Ghash into the discussion not me. I never once compared BAN to Ghash or used that name until you brought it forth. I simply said this would not be tolerated from more established pools. Seems like to you that means Ghash.

And again when I said what I did about logins and payouts those were true. Glad its now resolved. But you should learn what FUD really is. Facts are not FUD. If you can prove to me that payouts were not missing for the time they were and that many users did not report login issues I will concede to spreading FUD. Good luck with that.

I brought GHASH in because you were comparing other pools already as in BTCGuild, BitMinter -- I'm not sure if they're one manned operations or not, however when you said "those pools" (also including me bringing in GHASH into the subject) you are quoted saying "those pools are always broken" meaning that pools possibly ran by more than one person are always broken.  Same again, broken logic my friend.  

I cannot prove anything on the payouts as I do not run the pool, s0br does.  Go ahead and concede because the login issues about people saying they haven't had any issues are 1 - 2 pages back, feel free to browse on through them.

adaryian : Are you sure you dont work for the pool?

Positive.  I have a working relationship with s0br and since he was away for whatever reason as I have not spoken to him yet, I'm simply trying to defend my friend who has done so much for everyone already and he's personally helped me out with personal matters that is between us.  So if I come across sounding like an a**hole; I'm standing up for someone I care about as a friend and whom I have a great deal of trust in.

I haven't had any login issues at all. Front end has been a bit slow sometimes but that can be said for most pools.

ThePhwner Please read above statement to help reinforce that sound of swallowing pride.  It sucks, I know..


WHOOOAA!!
I was out enjoying a sunny day in the middle of the Southern Hemisphere winter, got to the old pub Moarrr The Boar to hang out with mates there to find out everybody is spread on the floor, broken chairs, shattered mirror, beer all over, ladies gone.
Holy Shangai! (Peter Sellers' quote).

I guess I missed the fun.
 Cool


Meh, merely exchanging camp fire stories and roasting trolls. Wink
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
WHOOOAA!!
I was out enjoying a sunny day in the middle of the Southern Hemisphere winter, got to the old pub Moarrr The Boar to hang out with mates there to find out everybody is spread on the floor, broken chairs, shattered mirror, beer all over, ladies gone.
Holy Shangai! (Peter Sellers' quote).

I guess I've missed the fun.
 Cool


legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
I haven't had any login issues at all. Front end has been a bit slow sometimes but that can be said for most pools.
sr. member
Activity: 241
Merit: 250
adaryian : Are you sure you dont work for the pool?
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.

So, with that logic.. ghash.io is a great pool.  Roll Eyes

1. We were talking about one-man operations, Ghash.io is not. If a one-man operation runs well, it's great.

2. Who in their right minds thinks GHash is well-run? Those pools are constantly broken.

You were the one comparing the two.  I simply broke it down.  You're comparing a multi-million + organization with a mere 3 week old pool.  That's a horrible comparison, so I was just using the logic you were using to help compare and contrast is all.

No one in their right minds obviously thinks GHASH is a well-run, profitable venture.  (Yet people still mine there, not sure why.) 

Also stating that a multi-million or above organization with more than one employee and stating they're constantly broken is another proof of validity that you're again using broken logic for comparison.

---

I'm not trying to pick a fight or continue to be a dick.. That's not my objective.  What you're doing though is continuing to spread FUD.  It's pointless.

What multimillion dollar organization? And again, I will say, facts are not FUD. I never accused s0br of any theft or drew any conclusions. Payouts were missed. Site was down. This appears to be too much for one person to handle. Not FUD.

CEX / GHASH -> Multi-Million dollar operation.

"Pardon the dust.. we're actively working on reflecting accurate PPS estimates and payouts... " is a fact.

Payouts being missed? Read above.  Site was not down.  Multiple others can attest to that.  It appears that this pool is still new and is still currently being developed... again, read above quotation.  Your remarks: FUD.

Done with this argument.. We've been paid so I'm done arguing with you on this subject.

Peace.

So glad your final word is Gospel. Amen.

YOU brought Ghash into the discussion not me. I never once compared BAN to Ghash or used that name until you brought it forth. I simply said this would not be tolerated from more established pools. Seems like to you that means Ghash.

And again when I said what I did about logins and payouts those were true. Glad its now resolved. But you should learn what FUD really is. Facts are not FUD. If you can prove to me that payouts were not missing for the time they were and that many users did not report login issues I will concede to spreading FUD. Good luck with that.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
★ BitClave pre-ICO: 25/07/17 ★
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.

So, with that logic.. ghash.io is a great pool.  Roll Eyes

1. We were talking about one-man operations, Ghash.io is not. If a one-man operation runs well, it's great.

2. Who in their right minds thinks GHash is well-run? Those pools are constantly broken.

You were the one comparing the two.  I simply broke it down.  You're comparing a multi-million + organization with a mere 3 week old pool.  That's a horrible comparison, so I was just using the logic you were using to help compare and contrast is all.

No one in their right minds obviously thinks GHASH is a well-run, profitable venture.  (Yet people still mine there, not sure why.) 

Also stating that a multi-million or above organization with more than one employee and stating they're constantly broken is another proof of validity that you're again using broken logic for comparison.

---

I'm not trying to pick a fight or continue to be a dick.. That's not my objective.  What you're doing though is continuing to spread FUD.  It's pointless.

What multimillion dollar organization? And again, I will say, facts are not FUD. I never accused s0br of any theft or drew any conclusions. Payouts were missed. Site was down. This appears to be too much for one person to handle. Not FUD.

CEX / GHASH -> Multi-Million dollar operation.

"Pardon the dust.. we're actively working on reflecting accurate PPS estimates and payouts... " is a fact.

Payouts being missed? Read above.  Site was not down.  Multiple others can attest to that.  It appears that this pool is still new and is still currently being developed... again, read above quotation.  Your remarks: FUD.

Done with this argument.. We've been paid so I'm done arguing with you on this subject.

Peace.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.

So, with that logic.. ghash.io is a great pool.  Roll Eyes

1. We were talking about one-man operations, Ghash.io is not. If a one-man operation runs well, it's great.

2. Who in their right minds thinks GHash is well-run? Those pools are constantly broken.

You were the one comparing the two.  I simply broke it down.  You're comparing a multi-million + organization with a mere 3 week old pool.  That's a horrible comparison, so I was just using the logic you were using to help compare and contrast is all.

No one in their right minds obviously thinks GHASH is a well-run, profitable venture.  (Yet people still mine there, not sure why.) 

Also stating that a multi-million or above organization with more than one employee and stating they're constantly broken is another proof of validity that you're again using broken logic for comparison.

---

I'm not trying to pick a fight or continue to be a dick.. That's not my objective.  What you're doing though is continuing to spread FUD.  It's pointless.

What multimillion dollar organization? And again, I will say, facts are not FUD. I never accused s0br of any theft or drew any conclusions. Payouts were missed. Site was down. This appears to be too much for one person to handle. Not FUD.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
★ BitClave pre-ICO: 25/07/17 ★

No one in their right minds obviously thinks GHASH is a well-run, profitable venture.

Technically speaking, ghash.io is very profitable to its owners Smiley


Touché
full member
Activity: 148
Merit: 100
SelfPay - ICO PRE SALE - huge Profit !

No one in their right minds obviously thinks GHASH is a well-run, profitable venture.

Technically speaking, ghash.io is very profitable to its owners Smiley

Just messing around. I'm not at my wallet PC to check it, but I do see a big transaction in the My Earnings link of the pool waiting to be confirmed so that covers those lost hours according to hourly PPS.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
★ BitClave pre-ICO: 25/07/17 ★
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.

So, with that logic.. ghash.io is a great pool.  Roll Eyes

1. We were talking about one-man operations, Ghash.io is not. If a one-man operation runs well, it's great.

2. Who in their right minds thinks GHash is well-run? Those pools are constantly broken.

You were the one comparing the two.  I simply broke it down.  You're comparing a multi-million + organization with a mere 3 week old pool.  That's a horrible comparison, so I was just using the logic you were using to help compare and contrast is all.

No one in their right minds obviously thinks GHASH is a well-run, profitable venture.  (Yet people still mine there, not sure why.) 

Also stating that a multi-million or above organization with more than one employee and stating they're constantly broken is another proof of validity that you're again using broken logic for comparison.

---

I'm not trying to pick a fight or continue to be a dick.. That's not my objective.  What you're doing though is continuing to spread FUD.  It's pointless.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.

So, with that logic.. ghash.io is a great pool.  Roll Eyes

1. We were talking about one-man operations, Ghash.io is not. If a one-man operation runs well, it's great.

2. Who in their right minds thinks GHash is well-run? Those pools are constantly broken.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Aside from those crying foul, I don't see over reacting but caution and a cry for clarification. What is wrong with that? One can support the pool and still be cautious.

Also: I never had a log on problem- the site works fine for me.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
★ BitClave pre-ICO: 25/07/17 ★
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.

So, with that logic.. ghash.io is a great pool.  Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
something something Bitcoin
All is judged by how its run. In theory nothing. This looks like reinforcements may be needed.
full member
Activity: 352
Merit: 100
1 minute ago. relax
Quote
[00:20] hey s0br, any ETA when the payments starts working?
[00:22] <@s0br> yeah
[00:22] <@s0br> i’m working on payment snow
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
★ BitClave pre-ICO: 25/07/17 ★
Without bringing any accusations into this mix, can we objectively look at the fact that this is a huge undertaking which seems to be the responsibility of one person from a technical standpoint?

Hey, what's wrong with a one man operation?

+1
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
Without bringing any accusations into this mix, can we objectively look at the fact that this is a huge undertaking which seems to be the responsibility of one person from a technical standpoint?

Hey, what's wrong with a one man operation?
Pages:
Jump to: