We can't people that keep on saying that there's a project that's better than Bitcoin. It is them but if it's actually better than it, people will recognize and realize it. There's no need to hype and buzz for it but typically, they're all not going to do well in the end if they keep associating their projects and hype on Bitcoin. They have to be a stand alone and if they want to market, that's fine. As long as they will do it on their own, without having any comparison because that's what they think is the right thing to do but with what I've seen, it's not going to work long term.
Usually, people hype such projects because they are going to get something out of it/they want more people fomoing about it, thus increasing their own share in it.
So yeah - reputation should speak for the project itself, that's a great view on the matter.
People should be done with hype projects and look at the point of view that it's important to look at the reputation of it. Not every project needs to be marketed the way they want it to be. That's not how it goes to be honest but every bull run, it's just everyone's way of dealing with it as a gimmick.People should move past the hype surrounding projects and focus on the reputation and long-term sustainability of a project. While flashy marketing and overhyped campaigns may grab attention, they don't guarantee real value or success. It's crucial to assess a project based on its credibility, team, technology, and vision rather than just the noise. Every bull run tends to amplify these gimmicks, with many investors chasing trends instead of solid fundamentals. Ultimately, successful projects are built on trust, transparency, and genuine utility, not just temporary hype. Taking a thoughtful, informed approach ensures more reliable, long-term growth in the crypto space.
