Topic: MISTAKE: I got a negative trust for doing NOTHING! - page 2. (Read 1638 times)

Then the admins should have a discussion about delegating this power to a few of the others as well.
Perhaps global moderators can be given the power to issue temp bans as well.

I think a temp ban would be better indeed, but from what Im told its difficult to reach staff members that can issue one.

If the problem is with the user spamming, the right approach would be to get a temp ban in place.
Negative trust just seems wrong.

Why do you think people care about your opinion if you dont give any reasons for it? How is that a discussion with worth to anyone?


I implied that you dont in the other threads. You claim you post in quick succession because you type fast. That might be true and I cant argue that. I argue that you dont take the time to read.


You can think about it what you wont, trust is not moderated. You have to iron this out with Lauda. Maybe you shouldnt expect to get paid if you just want to chat. See the post by Milkduds above, if you are wearing a paid signature its more likely that anyone[1] will think you post for the few satoshi when they see posts in quick succession.

I suggest you follow Vods advice, take off the signature as well and Im sure the rating is gone in a month. If not, let me know, Ill talk to Lauda if needed.

[1] staff, regular user or admin

I mostly post in the Altcoin section where people talk about their favorite coins. How can you say my post is low-quality just because I am give my opinion in a sentence?

No, I was waiting to read people's responses.


I open more than three windows on my browser, go to my favorite sections (which is altcoins) and chat with people.
What is wrong with that?


What did I do to be labelled as "Untrustworthy"?
Do people become "Untrustworthy" for posting fast???



I don't think it's right to give negative trusts to people who did not do anything wrong to anybody.

You are not labelled as a scammer - you are labelled as untrustworthy by Lauda.  You don't need to interact with someone to not trust them.

People will read the feedback and decide if it is relevant to them or not. 

Change the way you post and in a month come back and ask nicely to have the feedback removed.   

Yes, but its not limited to off-topic posts.


When the quality degrades.


So you log in every few days and read the backlog of the threads you posted in within a minute? Its a discussion(!) board. You do not engage in discussions, you post in threads where you can get away with posting your opinion in a sentence or two without giving it any weight. Interestingly it took you longer to post here, probably because you actually want to discuss something now.


Lauda believes that its a way to clean up the forum. You will very likely lose your position in the signature campaign because of this which removes your incentive to spam in the first place. If this is the way you like to post, the rating should not affect you otherwise. Its clearly worded so it should not interfere with any trades either.

I personally would rather go for your campaigner instead. Shut down the entire campaign with negative ratings, if they are unable to handle spammers. Its their job.

Spamming is when you write posts that are off-topic.

Can you identify which post of mine is off-topic?

Just because I post fast does not mean I am spamming...

When did fast posting = Spam?

I only make 10 posts/day about thrice a week, making about 30 posts/week - is it spam just because I type fast?



I HAVE NEVER AT ANY TIME ASKED FOR ANYTHING FROM ANYBODY ON THIS FORUM, why should I be labeled a scammer?

because your post is obviously just for signature earnings.The interval of your response and a one liner post is the sign of abuse and spam of this forum, The mods has the right to put red trust for that kind of behavior because that attitude is harmful for the community. I reviewed too your post history and it is accurate on what lauda said on his feedback.


I agree that farm accounts are wrong but if that farmed account is sold to a new owner with good skills and have a incredible knowledge about crypto. I think it will become worth it,  because not all expert crypto user already know this forum, and once they newly discover this forum, they want to bought high rank account so that their knowledge that they are going to share is valuable because newbie post in this forum is always ignored even if it has sense. I observed this many times and their is inequality about rankings here, Higher ranks bully lower rank that's why many people tempted to buy account.


But i extremely disagree for those farm accounts that is holding by only one user and joined it for signature campaign for earning, They are the accounts that committing spam on this forum. I hope theymos resolved this issue because this is getting bigger and bigger.

Have a hard time with giving people flack over short responses because I know some people in real life that you would never know could barely read and write due to learning disabilities and the internet can be a cruel world for them at times. I also understand that there is a large segment that are practicing English or do not have a great grasp on the language.
So I was interested to see who was crusading against members in this way and was shocked to see it was a mod. So I paused and thought there must be more to the issue and I looked at Dasiy14s post history. The red flag for me was not the short responses but the time stamps on the responses! You seem to be jumping post to post making these one line responses within a minute repeatedly. That is not a normal state of operation for people that are reading a whole thread or just reading and responding for interest,it established a clear pattern.

Wearing a signature puts a little more pressure on the member to provide a more well thought out response. So when you put that on you should be aware that you will be needing to improve quality of posts. Improve the quality and see if Lauda is open to changing the trust in the future,trust is just a suggestion. Really just effects signature endorsement and not much else,especially since you are not transacting in any other way.

Just my two cents,nothing personal in my response. Trust is a touchy subject and I think a neutral trust rating would have worked just fine for driving a agenda to clean up the forum.
But I also have not chewed through the issue as much as the mods here.

Are you a mod?
Because having a farmed account is not illegal on the forum.
Writing one-liners that make sense is not illegal either.
And what is your definition of "Recycled Post"? Because I did not recycle my post or anyone else's

It is not wrong to insert a quote either.


And whoever said you will get a negative trust for "Spamming"?

If I were actually spamming then my posts will get deleted - which is not the case here.

Spamming. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16835950

Consecutive one liners, recycled post and not even contributing to the forum. You are also in a list of farmed account.
You are in a sig campaign that don't check post quality that often and you decide to abuse it. https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/daisy14-812240

This topic is for the mods. I woke up this morning to find a negative trust on my account that shows up in the Altcoin section when I have NEVER

1. Done any trade on this forum
2. Borrowed money from anyone
3. Asked anybody to do anything for me
4. Asked anything from anybody

I mean what did I do to deserve a negative trust?

Who did I try to scam? Check my posts. This is amazing!

And I am enrolled in a signature campaign. I could get banned for something that is not my fault.

I mean what exactly did I do?