Well here you go. heres what was sent to me from GES :
Thankyou for the email. Our office/s is located in Hong Kong, at this stage we are using a serviced office to deal Urocoin in Central, Hong Kong. We also have 2 other office in Hong Kong. The main reason we are not publishing our phone numbers online is due to alarming numbers of "annoying" phone calls received on daily bases.
Please understand that investments in to Urocoin should be based on your own confidence.
Follow the latest news and development on URO :
https://twitter.com/GESystemsgroup | www.gescommodity.com
Yours Sincerely,
Clifton Tang
Sales and Support
Green Earth Systems Ltd, Hong Kong
So once again, not very inspiring... I asked for contact information and they gave me the email address I already have. A company brokering a deal that would eventually net them a huge gain would put me in touch with someone right away, not tell me that my investment should be "based on confidence."
This tells us nothing, not even proper English in the reply. Why would a multi-million dollar entity pull its contact info because of a few "annoying" calls?
Because it's Bullshit
I replied once again asking for them to put me in touch with somebody other than a sales associate. I bet I get another generic reply.
I will keep you posted
I notice you didn't include the email you sent them, but based on the response you must have asked why they don't publish a phone number. Did you even mention you're looking to make a deal for urea? It doesn't look like it.
Here's an idea- stop theorizing about how you think they should do business and complete the deal you claim you want to do.
Why would you let something like what you deem to be improper English keep you from making a ton of money?
See how that argument turns right around on you?
you should know the facts before you assume that I did not mention that I represent a large group interested in investing in cryptocurrecny. I stated earlier that I would not be releasing that information because I am speaking for a committee of about 10 people and they do not wish the name of our group to be publicly published here until something is finalized. However...
since you guys will probably try to pick me apart and defend this coin blindly I will go ahead and show you the edited bulk of the message, which was over 2 pages long
I recently came across a topic on a forum that deals with cryptocurrency and found your project to be quite intriguing. I am involved with a group interested in investing some capitol into cryptocurrencies and think that a currency backed by a commodity would be a very wise investment. I brought it up with my investment group at our weekly meeting on (edited) and we came to a unanimous decision to contact you for further details. I have reviewed the contract that was provided to me and given copies to my legal department to review and they came back immediately with a question about the contract.
It seems that there are no company contacts for any of the alleged suppliers of the UREA. Before my group plans of investing this kind of capitol I would like to have my lawyers confirm some things. Do you have any contact information for your company other than an email address. That is a huge red flag for the legal dept. here as there would be no recourse for action if the deal fell through.
Also, it has been brought to my attention that there is no verification process for the shipment other than a document which is backed by companies that I have been unable to trace to a source. The phone number you have on your website led to a man who would not tell me where he was located and had no idea what Urocoin even was.
I would like some more information about your company and some contact information to set up a conference call with my group to clear up any legal issues before we proceed.
I go on to list our credentials, contact information, website, board of trustees, etc...
Asked them to put me in touch with someone who can help us broker a deal and they replied by giving me the email address I already have and saying my investment should be "based on confidence"
They really aren't giving me any reason to feel confident about anything I have been lead to believe about this deal or this company.