Emotional manipulation and use of gmail accounts are part of a scam. See these for further information. These sites verify that a scam uses religious or values based manipulation and use email accounts that are created using platforms like gmail.
http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mjf45egim/it-sounds-too-good-to-be-true-2/http://www.fasttopten.com/list/top-ten-signs-youre-dealing-with-a-scam-artist
True-Asset has used the tactic of emotional manipulation as seen in his so-called “values” video. Also on this forum
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600639.3960 he showed signs of manipulation.
See posts
563 on page 29: True-Asset acknowledges that the so-called ratified signature is false.
http://uro.io/Uro%20Protocol%20CCL%20Pillay%20Instrument%20of%20Ratification%20June%202014%20JPG90.jpg570 on page 29: True-Asset acknowledges that websites do not provide accuracy of information.
625 on page 32: True-Asset talks about the so-called NIER’s policy on philanthropy.
2311 and 2319 on page 116: True-Asset uses manipulation with the words, ‘cowardly’ and religious connotations with talking about ‘karma’
2389 on page 120: True-Asset talks about bullying, yet he and his supporters have bullied anyone who queried the legitimacy of the coin, especially when people have asked legitimate questions and when they've provided proof of what they're talking about.
2423 on page 122: True-Asset claims he will call the Federal Police. Wouldn’t you call that bullying, especially when they’re asking people to hand over their money with little valid information?
On the moderated forum
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=684972.540See these posts
556 on page 28: Bohan claims, “I am formally separating from my position with GES AU, a postion I held since before the start of the Uro project.”
Yet in this
http://cointelegraph.com/news/112355/over-the-next-5-years-the-demand-for-uro-will-far-outstrip-the-total-supply-bohan-huang-urocoinBohan claims, “ I started up a company back in 2012 that focused on secure IP CCTV networks, software night vision enhancement and AI object detection (TruHD) that was later acquired by GES AU (which amongst other business activities had an ageing CCTV arm that was past its time technologically).”
So how has Bohan formally separated from GES AU??
On this site
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--6872311540 on page 73: True-Asset attacks Hobopete for supposedly not being loyal when all he was doing was asking legitmate questions and seeking information that many people have been asking. True-Asset said,
“I have to say you lack of faith really hurts me to the core.
GES is a multibillion dollar company, and they have nothing to proof to you.
GES does business using many companies they own throughout the world, but none of this is going to be publicised, because they do not wish to publicise it.
If you have not faith, then just sell.
As peoplyou are all too short sighted and sceptical to understand the true scale of GES.
I tried to give the young people here a chance to get a piece of the pie - and it does not seem they care enough to want it.
If you want to now turn against me, then go for it.”
Would a director of a multi-international company send someone a PM or email like this to someone who was asking questions? What about saying to people that they need to do their own research or tell people, “ ...investments in to urocoin should be based on your own confidence.”
Does that mean it’s your responsibility that you lose your money not 'ours' (meaning GES) and if you do too bad?
GES is hardly an ethical company that they claim to be.
