Topic: [Moderated] [ANN][URO] First Urea Commodity Token: 1 Uro = 1 Metric Tonne Urea - page 56. (Read 227157 times)

Hello Truthful.

Hopbopete, I have been watching this forum. I will say straight up that I believe it's a scam. I've been virtually non-existent and will say my two cents worth.

If you are going to attempt to make Uro seem valid through another dictatorship such as your forum here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/urocoin-community-research-thread-742456. Then you will certainly make the Uro seem like a diaster as the coin has had to create so many forums to keep it looking credible. To those who have watched this forum it's been a joke. The altcoin community hasn't taken this seriously except for a few bagholders who seem desperate to salvage a penny.

I would recommend to you that most people won't believe that you can neither prove or disprove Nilesh Nair's bankruptcy. Why would a document from Veda be false?? http://www.docdroid.net/f94l/bankruptcy-search-1.pdf.html. Documents don't lie. If you had truly taken the effort to prove or disprove it why haven't you purchased your own copy of the document available here. https://www.afsa.gov.au/resources/npii/npii-national-personal-insolvency-index Or why don't you



ring this number 1300 364 785 and ask the authorities. The number can be found here https://www.afsa.gov.au/about-us/contact-us.

Most people know that this is something you can prove or disprove. I think that a report from Veda would not be false. You will make yourself look like a fool and your attempts to make your forum seem look like genuine research will be laughed at. The website for GES has been modified to try and reflect a HK existence. If you look at previous versions of GES website it was all an Australian company. Nothing has changed on it except trying to make it seem like it's a HK company that's trying to seem like it's evolving by adding bits and pieces about some made up venture it's supposedly involved in. It all works towards making it look like a good scam. A scam is designed to suck you in with pumping people like yourself with as much so-called  'evidence' to keep you hooked. I don't think it's alright for any company to produce no evidence of anything. All the documents produced by Bohan, True- Asset or Nilesh look fake. If a company like RIVVA's was really involved, then surely there'd be more proof, unless I've missed it.

It seems that some lies have been told. That there's no office in HK and that the whole Uro thing is not being run from HK. Hard to believe that the company is a multi-international company when you can't find much out on it. Also the link you have https://creditorwatch.com.au/express/asic/organisation/147326252 is for the wrong company, yet you claim you have done your research!

You need to present facts, not opinions. From what I can see so far it's all your opinions based upon your bias towards the coin. Hardly, good research or a good sales pitch.