let me try this miner later,.
Topic: Modified XMR-STAK-AMD 0% DEV Fee - page 3. (Read 4976 times)
thank you for your effort,
let me try this miner later,.
let me try this miner later,.
You are a scammer and no, you didn't do the work. The developer did the work which you want to take credit for by compiling their work and distributing the executable, breaking the GPL license and screwing the developer out of his voluntary fee.
While I hear your point, I think 1% of ALL MINING CAPACITY OF THE ENTIRE WORLD is wayyy too much for someone who took a miner and modified it for a new algo. The 1% is like owning 100 x 7GPU mining rigs or something like that. The miner fee is OK but should be a lower reasonable amount.
In case of JUST XMR, the 1% Developer fee currently equates to over $110,000 PER WEEK with ZERO electricity cost. That is just ONE coin. No copy/modify/fork/paste software developer deserves that much unless they are Satoshi himself.
Xmr stak developers did not took a miner and modify it, they wrote it all from zero ground.
So they deserve the 1%.
No one writes anything from scratch. Its all copied over and over from existing GPL. 1300 Cryptos and there are 5 only ideas behind them. CGMiner may have been unique in its own way.
Fie deleted from server. Will you upload it again?
You are a scammer and no, you didn't do the work. The developer did the work which you want to take credit for by compiling their work and distributing the executable, breaking the GPL license and screwing the developer out of his voluntary fee.
While I hear your point, I think 1% of ALL MINING CAPACITY OF THE ENTIRE WORLD is wayyy too much for someone who took a miner and modified it for a new algo. The 1% is like owning 100 x 7GPU mining rigs or something like that. The miner fee is OK but should be a lower reasonable amount.
In case of JUST XMR, the 1% Developer fee currently equates to over $110,000 PER WEEK with ZERO electricity cost. That is just ONE coin. No copy/modify/fork/paste software developer deserves that much unless they are Satoshi himself.
Xmr stak developers did not took a miner and modify it, they wrote it all from zero ground.
So they deserve the 1%.
$110,000 per week though? The latest XMR stak is 2%..
You are a scammer and no, you didn't do the work. The developer did the work which you want to take credit for by compiling their work and distributing the executable, breaking the GPL license and screwing the developer out of his voluntary fee.
While I hear your point, I think 1% of ALL MINING CAPACITY OF THE ENTIRE WORLD is wayyy too much for someone who took a miner and modified it for a new algo. The 1% is like owning 100 x 7GPU mining rigs or something like that. The miner fee is OK but should be a lower reasonable amount.
In case of JUST XMR, the 1% Developer fee currently equates to over $110,000 PER WEEK with ZERO electricity cost. That is just ONE coin. No copy/modify/fork/paste software developer deserves that much unless they are Satoshi himself.
Xmr stak developers did not took a miner and modify it, they wrote it all from zero ground.
So they deserve the 1%.
You are a scammer and no, you didn't do the work. The developer did the work which you want to take credit for by compiling their work and distributing the executable, breaking the GPL license and screwing the developer out of his voluntary fee.
While I hear your point, I think 1% of ALL MINING CAPACITY OF THE ENTIRE WORLD is wayyy too much for someone who took a miner and modified it for a new algo. The 1% is like owning 100 x 7GPU mining rigs or something like that. The miner fee is OK but should be a lower reasonable amount.
In case of JUST XMR, the 1% Developer fee currently equates to over $110,000 PER WEEK with ZERO electricity cost. That is just ONE coin. No copy/modify/fork/paste software developer deserves that much unless they are Satoshi himself.
Here is the math: https://imgur.com/a/kNuwp
https://imgur.com/a/kNuwp
strange things is going on 
It's not strange things. Just nut bags. lol..
I've got stalkers who got nothing better to do.
They get government funding to sniff my asshole.
All miners are recognized as virus.
I'm working on newer version. Thanks.
Will this work with newer updates? Thanks tho.
great ^^ thk for your sharing
can you make the 2.1.0 stak 0% fee please?
Oh yeah, btw fookin Vann is the forums junk yard dog. Watch out if you are trying to do lame shit here...
strange things is going on
I'm not taking credit for anybody's work. I did however did the work for someone who isn't too familiar with compiling codes.
Scammer is someone who scams people. I did no such thing. The code is open source. If you have a problem report it to the authorities or bitcointalk moderators. Otherwise you are just making silly accusations. Either way stop spamming threads.
Scammer is someone who scams people. I did no such thing. The code is open source. If you have a problem report it to the authorities or bitcointalk moderators. Otherwise you are just making silly accusations. Either way stop spamming threads.
You aren't including the source code nor the license file. You are indeed violating the GPL.
Can you make one for the all in one version
link: https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak
would really appreciate it.
link: https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak
would really appreciate it.
Thanks at least some are appreciative...
I say thumbs up for making this free!
I'm not taking credit for anybody's work. I did however did the work for someone who isn't too familiar with compiling codes.
Scammer is someone who scams people. I did no such thing. The code is open source. If you have a problem report it to the authorities or bitcointalk moderators. Otherwise you are just making silly accusations. Either way stop spamming threads.
Scammer is someone who scams people. I did no such thing. The code is open source. If you have a problem report it to the authorities or bitcointalk moderators. Otherwise you are just making silly accusations. Either way stop spamming threads.
You are a scammer and no, you didn't do the work. The developer did the work which you want to take credit for by compiling their work and distributing the executable, breaking the GPL license and screwing the developer out of his voluntary fee.
Jump to: