Topic: @ Mods requesting ban for jollyGood (Read 872 times)

Thanks for restating the obvious for the 5th time, Quickseller.

Lying in accusations is not a reason to ban someone. If he is really lying, it should not be difficult to defend yourself with fact based evidence.

I don’t always agree with JollyGoods ways of exposing what he believes to be scams, but I cannot recall a time when I disagreed with his conclusions that something was a scam. This really doesn’t matter though and I would refer you to the first line in this post.

if this is his known second account;  this should be enough to make so that we should never have to deal with him again.....  It would be clear-cut.

You got banned for plagiarism. You're not supposed to be posting outside of your ban appeal thread.

Stop crying. Nobody wants to hear it.

This is my first post in this thread.

The OP is currently serving a 90 ban along with another troll from the Bankera/Spectrocoin scam thread because theymos banned them after they made several false flags using sock-puppets and because they were flooding and spamming. Many of their sock-puppet accounts that were used to troll and generate fake buzz have been permanently banned which is great news.

Regarding the current flurry of posts from Goodcat49, I had to un-IGNORE him to see what he was spouting. It seems this deluded individual is making astonishingly ludicrous claims that moderators are having sexual relations with members and giving out "rigged trust" in return (whatever that might mean)

He has not stated names of which moderators he is accusing of being behind a scheme that offers "rigged trust" in exchange for sexual relations but I think it clearly displays a mental imbalance on his part which might provide an insight as to why he made up such preposterous allegations against moderators of the very forum he pumps his propaganda in.


updated on 29th October 2019:  The quoted post where user Goodcat49 accused moderators of giving out "rigged trust" in return for sexual favours has thankfully been deleted by moderators along with the trolling he attempted in the betking scam thread.

ok I went through the SVR thread and stopped at that one... I do not need to see any more.


JollyGood is well within reason, and is actually being quite nice about it all.


The sock-puppet posting and fake hype by newb low post count and sleeping accounts is kind-of boring predictable, and quite recognizable.    I agree with him.  Strike 1.  
The project smells VERY fishy...   ANN initial posts lists the coin starting as a premine, in replies in the thread it was mentioned it was actually a swap....  Which was a PREMINE of 100,000.   Strike 2....
Simple 'hype' of the project and introduce, then immediate dump on exchange....    some time later, more 'hype' timed with a huge pump and more 'hype' to follow... Strike 3.........
People trying to sell in the thread at 10x current exchange price who in all reality appear to be coming from you in one form or another..... Strike 4......................


I have also left some clear negative feedback with reference links on some of the individuals' profiles in that thread.

I suggest you own up to the heat; and stop getting your panties in a bunch every time your honor is questioned.... Stop acting like a child.  Take criticism and build upon it as to NOT RECEIVE ANY MORE; which would be a sign that YOU ARE ACTUALLY DOING THINGS RIGHT.    The behavior in the many pages of that thread who are defending SVR is VERY laughable and makes you and the sock puppet accounts look petty.

Grow up.

If you expect me to take your response seriously, address everything I have touched on.... like an adult would.

Another thread abouth these scammers: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52885653

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51415946 this thread (and really many others) is full of Jollygood's spam.

He is constanly blaming people and projects (sometimes without any proofs), insulting them, humilitating newbies, spamming all-over the forum, never answering questions. He destroyed trust system on Bitcointalk.

When I get more evidences this person is the biggest scammer here, I'll give it to you.

Please provide evidence (example). A screenshot doesn't count, anyone can make those.

Are you guys here serious? I don't care about Bankera project, but Jollygood, mosprognoz and others are the main scammers of this forum.

They unreasonably accuse projects of fraud and extort money(!!!)

Read their real trust (so-called "Untrusted feedback"), not the fake one that is being shown to the most of users.

One part of the evidence (for example):

https://image.ibb.co/fp01hn/1.jpg
https://image.ibb.co/hGjDTS/2.jpg
https://image.ibb.co/eCehOS/e7e565b2_e10a_40aa_bcf9_3b3e0c3079a9.jpg
https://b.radikal.ru/b42/1803/6e/f1958c607219.jpg
https://d.radikal.ru/d00/1803/64/3983be6624ea.jpg

Jolly's way of writing posts ruins scammers ANN threads and trash discussion from shill accounts like moris2025. I understand his frustration, but the rest of the community is grateful for his effort.

Additionally, investigated multiple scammy ICO's during all these years and warned many members about their shady practices.

Always very responsive to any questions and great member to talk with if you have something real to discuss, not some stupid ban request which will never find any support on this forum.

OP accuses JollyGood to not answer questions and accusations but has to remember that there is an IGNORE function that JollyGood is using and could be the reason he doesn't reply because all of spammers and shills he is after are IGNORED already, which means your posts are not visible for JollyGood.

JollyGood is a really good poster in an absolute cess pool of shit posters here at times. He absolutely does not deserve to get banned & he won’t be.

OP, you’re obviously a butt hurt Bankera shill who got found out. Take your medicine like a man & STFU. Give me one JollyGood over a million of your type. He brings far more to this forum than you ever could.

I tried to look at JollyGood's post history, and I found that his post quality is not that bad (definitely not shitpost). Not sure why OP calls it shitposts. Furthermore, he is not promoting an ico-protect service to scam people.

Conclusion:
- not shitposts
- legit accusations
- don't deserve a ban

You're free to click "Report to moderator" if you feel a post is in violation of the rules.

But considering the fact that you're creating false Flags, even though theymos gave clear guidelines, I don't think you care much about forum rules.

Shit! JollyGood is currently raising $100 million to build a time machine. This is clear evidence he's going to succeeded within a few years, and it seems OP got his hands on the time machine!

OK. Another few flags opposed. Only few people are cleaning the scammers like the OP and as long as I see this kind of threads, I know JollyGood is doing a great job.
If someone is about to ban him, then he better ban me as well, because me with Jolly are on the same boat.

You think you can just drop in here and request  mods to just ban any user you wish just because they exposed your little scammy projects?
I just checked out your post history and to be honest, you have Zero contributions to the community...Zero. You are actually filling up the forum with your scam shill and spamming alt accounts.

Dream on.

you said what? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/mods-requesting-bans-for-coinsbit-sock-puppets-5190706 lol....  But I do tend to side with these guys against the OP....  Ive clicked the links, seen some nonsense.

Just give it up and move on.  Try to do better I guess?

the best is that jollyGood does not post here. heads up for that.

My dear bankera shill, let me tell you how things usually unfold here.

It starts with a catsher (whatever that is) catching some scammers, ann bumper, shills and calling them out and getting one by one their accounts banned. But because their main territory of doing so is buried deep in the shitcoin section most of the members here don't notice any of the events.

Seeing that their accounts are getting fewer each day, the topic is dying, accusation pile up, like any rat in panic they try to strike back, and, unaware of the forum rules, the forum general attitude, on how people in meta react he tries this non-sense of getting the scam buster banned. What the rat doesn't know is that he came out of the hole with this move and he effectively attracted the interest of other DT members. And just like people who come here for a ban appeal for plagiarism end up with four accounts banned for plagiarism, the same will happen to you.

Now, don't you feel like it was a really bad move to open this topic?

@JollyGood is not lying he did on the basis of valid evidence,

Not with you.
You are Bankera's scamers, by creating thousands of accounts, then answering people's complaints yourself.

This is unprofessional, some of your accounts have been blocked, maybe the same thing will happen.
So stop blaming everyone, because you yourself are wrong.

@JollyGood, says that you are the most dangerous spamer.

[1]. moris2025
[2]. Moris1987
[3]. MORIS1986
[4]. MorisYT
[5]. moriskarlov
[6]. morispaul1990
[7]. moris2004(Archived)
[8]. moris02(Archived)
[9]. moris43(Archived)
[10]. Moris00
[11]. moris932 (Archived)
[12]. morisa11 (Archived)
[13]. morisa15 (Archived)
[14]. danmoris

Proof you speak to yourself. Ridiculous, does not make sense.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.44175940

http://archive.is/10tgK

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.42932528

http://archive.is/GxMUa

I don't want to argue with you, but this is presented on the basis of facts. The judge does not sentence a sentence, if the criminal is not proven, the sentence handed down based on accurate evidence.