Good participants should do research about the company, the platform they are hired in campaigns in order to understand about the platform and its products. At the end, with basic understanding, they will be able to
- Know that company is legit or scam
- Support the company with their proactive creative idea to improve platform, products; make proposals; and inform the team about bugs, typoes they find
These things should be done naturally to increase probability of success for the campaign and the business. It would be better for all related sides: company, campaign manager and campaign participants.
Matured participants should do it naturally.
Also, i think the campaign managers can encourage people to write feedback (good or bad) on the site in their ANN threads though they should not provide extra incentives for it.
Also, there should be no complusion on writing only good about the company. Positive criticism should always be welcome and it is in fact good for the company/site.
Finally, the rules are updated by the Manager