It is also important to add that most players consider all Moneypot sites the same. Their implementation is too obvious and even if the site owners made an effort to create a different site, it is mostly "yet another Moneypot site".
Had it been developed differently, it'd have been more successful.
Had it been developed differently, it'd have been more successful.
thx for your posting
Had it been developed differently, it'd have been more successful.
could you please give an example what you mean here? thx
They would have earned money anyway and the players would not feel they're always playing the same game.
While I agree that for players the fact that a site is using Moneypot can be an assurance of safety, they tend to think "oh look, another Moneypot casino" when they see one.
If you read the threads here on BitcoinTalk of any Moneypot sites you'll read several of these comments.
thx for the explanation. IMO the MP business idea was a very good one. one mistake was to allow the untitled dice version to be implemented without any restrictions.
