It can only be a scam if they will not gonna pay those who are in the whitelist.
I think if I am not mistaken, tomorrow will be the day where those who are eligible will receive their tokens.
But as I see it, there are a lot of complains and it cannot be solve at instant, maybe this problem will be solve but on a slow basis because they
are going to review it for sure.
Topic: MoneyToken scam ? - page 3. (Read 789 times)
It is expected to happen since there is no trusted bounty manager involved and i do avoid ICO bounty that is not runned by a 3rd party because they can change payments and reject participants whenever they want.
I also agree with you because in a project that doesn't have a bounty manager or a trusted one, the company can decide to change their rule at anytime and also reject participant who have taken their time to promote the project when it is time to get reward, this is very disappointing and next time you want to join a bounty campaign, take time to make sure it has a very good manager and it is a potential one before you join. 
I participated in the signature company during the whole time of the company, passed the KYC as required after the sales and I have nothing against it.
But then how the auditor checks the records causes outrage or disgust for the whole project as a whole. I was caught in 26 farm accounts - think about it 26 without any proof and put it on the red list of trust! I wonder if there are adequate managers who can check my involvement in the management of these farms, I'm completely covered for this since I always used only 1 entry on the forum and did not violate anything!
Here is his decision:
But then how the auditor checks the records causes outrage or disgust for the whole project as a whole. I was caught in 26 farm accounts - think about it 26 without any proof and put it on the red list of trust! I wonder if there are adequate managers who can check my involvement in the management of these farms, I'm completely covered for this since I always used only 1 entry on the forum and did not violate anything!
Here is his decision:
Quote
Account farming, linked accounts Bitcointalk: 1107447, 1107448, 1107451, 1107458, 1107469, 1107484, 1107485, 1107492, 1107495, 1107496, 1107502, 1107510, 1107511, 1107514, 1107515, 1107516, 1107517, 1107524, 1107529, 1107531, 1107534, 1107539, 1107540, 1107541, 1107555, 1107613
Just do not want to pay bounty hunters that's all. it seems to me just made a fiction audit. they are supposedly not hunters but hunters. I'm amazed at how to get on the red list of people who joined the bounty in one day and because of this they are considered as multiaques
I dont believe that MoneyToken is a scam, but i have some questions to the auditor...
https://b.radikal.ru/b19/1807/a8/5d8aea410c91.png
He/she put me in a red list because my and someone else's account were registered in the same day. Maybe October 2, 2017 500 new accounts were registered, and only one of them also participated in the moneytoken bounty... So is it enough to proof that this acconts are owned by one man and exclude them from the campaign??
I have the same problem. I've always used only 1 account. but I'm in red list because I have multi account. and they say that they will give to everyone red trust, scammers https://b.radikal.ru/b19/1807/a8/5d8aea410c91.png
He/she put me in a red list because my and someone else's account were registered in the same day. Maybe October 2, 2017 500 new accounts were registered, and only one of them also participated in the moneytoken bounty... So is it enough to proof that this acconts are owned by one man and exclude them from the campaign??
I dont believe that MoneyToken is a scam, but i have some questions to the auditor...
He/she put me in a red list because my and someone else's account were registered in the same day. Maybe October 2, 2017 500 new accounts were registered, and only one of them also participated in the moneytoken bounty... So is it enough to proof that this acconts are owned by one man and exclude them from the campaign??
He/she put me in a red list because my and someone else's account were registered in the same day. Maybe October 2, 2017 500 new accounts were registered, and only one of them also participated in the moneytoken bounty... So is it enough to proof that this acconts are owned by one man and exclude them from the campaign??
They can change the terms whenever they like it because they know no one will even bother to sue them. Also such acts tells them who they really are and what they can do their investors when it will fail in the future.
KYC is becoming a crypto currency standard, this was the right move. It was disclosed since day 1 that MoneyToken dates and plenty more can change to adjust to their strategy. If everyone is patient, and seeks support instead of spreading FUD i can assure you'll be satisfied.
That depends on where the project is running yb the way. If that was running in US and it will be needed. A lot of unvertainties in this project i remember there is a lot of people are complaining about they are not getting approved by the developer and they have tried to submit the same kyc as before and they get approved. lol that's a joke.
KYC is becoming a crypto currency standard, this was the right move. It was disclosed since day 1 that MoneyToken dates and plenty more can change to adjust to their strategy. If everyone is patient, and seeks support instead of spreading FUD i can assure you'll be satisfied.
snif~
they do a sensible analysis and we can not deny that in this forum cheating is like everyday food, really like bounty with audits like this.yes I agree with your opinion. but i can not know for sure about the problem that happened for moneytoken project. because I did not follow the bounty project
1) valnester is the perfect exemple of one of the actual problem : account farming. He has probably multiple accounts and no-one checks how he uses them. I have the feeling, he made it in the "red trust list".
Although, it is not forbidden to have multiples accounts on bitcointalk, it is forbidden to use multiple accounts for the same campaign.
2) The introduction of KYC, I know it's a bit annoying, especially for people in countries like Yemen, which is not a listed country on the platform during registration.
3) I totally agree with you, this is the first time an audit like this is performed and it is a great step forward.
snif~
they do a sensible analysis and we can not deny that in this forum cheating is like everyday food, really like bounty with audits like this.yes I agree with your opinion. but i can not know for sure about the problem that happened for moneytoken project. because I did not follow the bounty project
yaa first time when i joined that time bounty manger also say that they dont apply any kyc but the end of the campaign they apply kyc and deduct the
bounty hunter token . i think its not a fair job its really frustrated bounty hunters
bounty hunter token . i think its not a fair job its really frustrated bounty hunters
This kind of advertising, isn't it should on the announcement board?
I do not believe that among the few thousand people who will not receive bounty, 100% are scammers. Scammers can be 10-20% but not more. Why are so many people affected? Why did moneytoken introduce all these people to the red page bitcointalk.org? Is it a gratitude for their work?
People are not honest anymore though very few are honest.
requesting kyc at end is just hideous. i have experience this and it's not funny
my worry on this attitude is just that if team can't be straight forward and discipline then their project is a scam.
they are fully aware that participant won't be much if they introduce KYC at the beginning so they basically let thousand of people do the work and then rip them off their reward using KYC.
requesting kyc at end is just hideous. i have experience this and it's not funny
my worry on this attitude is just that if team can't be straight forward and discipline then their project is a scam.
they are fully aware that participant won't be much if they introduce KYC at the beginning so they basically let thousand of people do the work and then rip them off their reward using KYC.
Well, as long as they didn’t reduce the total tokens to be paid out, can’t see this really being a scam. I think it’s a good idea to have KYC to get rid of the cheaters who game the system and are destroying the trust of the bounty industry.
This's why some bounties frustrates me. Telling participants that KYC is not needed, then at the very last minute before distribution, saying KYC is required. I remember SMT doing this, all those hard work for naught.
Hi, I also same as you. Some bounties make me disappointed, during the bounty time, the management team confirmed that no need KYC. But at the end of bounty, they said that all participants need to pass the KYC for distribution! I don't know why??
This's why some bounties frustrates me. Telling participants that KYC is not needed, then at the very last minute before distribution, saying KYC is required. I remember SMT doing this, all those hard work for naught.
It is expected to happen since there is no trusted bounty manager involved and i do avoid ICO bounty that is not runned by a 3rd party because they can change payments and reject participants whenever they want.
snif~
they do a sensible analysis and we can not deny that in this forum cheating is like everyday food, really like bounty with audits like this. Jump to: