Topic: More Solidcoin Bashing/Defense (split from Be Safe thread) (Read 2053 times)

It's him

coinhunter?
is that you?

lol, that sounds very you.






....wait, we already figured it anyways.
nevermiiiind.

See with a little effort, you actually made a claim that makes sense... indeed, I am one amazing piece of work. Nicely done.

If it was work, I wouldn't need to bash it, it's theft of the work of others and claiming it is yours. That, is in and of itself worthy of abuse. Being shilled so mindlessly in an utterly inappropriate venue makes it sport. You would be better off going into some place that might actually listen to the silliness about this farcical coin and consider adopting it. I would suggest perhaps the Deaf Club. Except it closed. Darn the luck.

Maybe you should stop hiding behind aliases and take credit for your abortion. Then people might take you seriously.

Until then, we can all enjoy Loup's treatment of you.

Edit made (you're one amazing piece of work...  All of that rambling in the name of bashing the work of others. So sad...)

Well, well, well, looks like Gilligan got marching orders from the Captain to stand up for his latest abomination in spite of all logic, truth or reality! Congrats, sock-puppet, welcome to the world. Let's break your last down, shall we?

The word you were looking for was "wastes", using "waists in this context makes no sense whatsoever, much like releasing any kind of new MicroShortBusCoinCash.

I don't need to call attention to my accomplishments or to debate personal merit, those who gain from knowing what I do and where I do it, know. Since you don't know means you don't matter. I don't have any need to debate personal accomplishments with a false identity created for the sole purpose of slavishly promoting a bad idea, in an inappropriate forum for doing so.

You could assure me that the moon is actually made of green cheese too, that would be equally nonsensical as "assuring" me about MicroShortBusCoinCash's success, and equally worthless. What I can assure you, is that your precious little vanity project will HAPPEN (if you ever get around to releasing your beta, just like all the other glorious failures of ShortBusCoin) without my participation.

And just a personal suggestion, if I might? When trying to make an ad hominem attack out of a badly mangled spelling of a trite homonym, at least try to stay with the original language. It adds cred to your shot, and allows people with an IQ in double digits or better to appreciate your wit. Your way just makes you look like a naughty little monkey throwing feces around your mom's basement.

Why not, bear with me for a second, just not post what you posted instead, giving notyep more ammo to reply to? These threads would fall off quicker if you actually did what you ask.

Another classic example "LoupGaroux", of an individual who has absolutely NO MERIT or accomplishments of his own, but wastes his time spreading garbage regarding the work of others.  Tell me "LoupGaroux", name just one thing that you have contributed in the name of BTC even. I can assure you, MC$ is going to succeed without you (LoupGalooser).  

Why do we even bother responding to yet another RS/CH/DoucheBag sock-puppet? Great, they have renamed their pile of steaming crap once again. This time in addition to stealing the code, they stole the name too. Guess that is sure going to attract the "investors" to their pretend little circle jerk world where the same group of five fuckwits keeps pretending they are manipulating the market, and that they somehow matter.

Guess what? Nobody gives a damn. It's a bad joke. Run by an incredibly stupid individual who insists that going back to the same well and back-raping the same group of ten people is going to make him a celebrity, and he will be able to move out of his mom's basement. None of this foolishness is real, there is no demand for yet another abortion of a crypto-joke coin. In the movies someone would have stuck a big ole stake through its pathetic little heart by now, instead we get to be entertained by the next personality leaking out from under RS/CH/Douchebag's meds.

No, it comes from people not understanding that the blockchain needs to be up-to-date. That's simply a matter of educating the users.

And don't try to change the subject. You claimed mobile clients for Bitcoin require a 1.3 GB blockchain download. They don't.

Are you kidding me???   This very app that you're promoting has a reputation for not being reliable!! I wonder why??? It is due to the massive size of the network block chain. If you hadn't noticed, the following remark comes the very front page of the URL you posted above:


Bakes on April 18, 2012 (HTC G2 with version 2.01)
Unreliable
Sent a coin from it weeks ago, still has not arrived. Do not transfer large amounts to your wallet, as you may never get them out again

notyep, the more you open your mouth the more you look like a fool.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.schildbach.wallet&hl=en

Android Bitcoin Wallet, doesn't use a host provider, and doesn't store a 1.3 GB blockchain.

* - details forthcoming (never lol)

Right, the "workaround" remote-control apps that have the "REAL" wallet on a host provider infrastructure wherein the security of your funds rests with the security of the host provider (how many of these horror films have we seen up to this point??? These disasters never seem to end do they??).  Let's face it, BTC wasn't designed for mobility and MC addresses that directly.

Oh - you mean the iPhone and Android BTC wallets that exist ... don't exist?
LOL

I can apply my argument to ANY current cyrpto-currency based on the original BTC design.  Take for instance the following graph:

http://blockchain.info/charts/blocks-size

It is the above characteristic why the current design has hit a brick wall.  We live in a mobile world now, there is absolutely no way possible for BTC or any other similar currency design with a block-chain this large to be used as a medium for commerce efficiently let alone in the world of mobility (are you kidding me, a 1.3GB blockhain?) The power that all the mobile phones, CPUs, GPUs would use to deal with such a download on the earth would be put to better use boiling the oceans.  This is one of the many problems the MC design solves.  As I've said before, don't compare it to anything BTC related, it is pointless.

I0coins are being traded on vircurex with a higher volume (even considering the price difference) than SC
I0coins 55x the volume, but SC is only 40x the price
So does that mean you can apply your argument to I0coins also?

Answer this, if SC/MC were not a viable currency, why on earth would it exist on BTC-e.com being traded for "BTC" at this very moment?? The answer is this, they see the potential and thus it will remain there.  Unfortunately, you're not wise enough to understand the amount of work and money that has been devoted to the project. I guess this means there are a lot of IDIOTs in the world?  Isn't it ironic that often those who are considered IDIOTs and go against the grain are the very ones that change the world for the better?  "Even in the deepest, darkest cave with a candlestick shining bright, there are those who will never see the light...."

v/r

Who are the ''investors'', again? Exchanges? Who is using this currency for buying/selling of products/services? For now I only see a few individuals speculating and looking for idiots.

Protip
Try elsewhere!

BTW. https://btc-e.com/news/67

McDonald's make a lot of money every year ...