Brad Garlinghouse also said that "Bitcoin — which is 1,000 times slower and more expensive than XRP — will still be used as a store of value, similar to the role that gold has played. But it won't be used for payments".
In this scenario, the value of bitcoin will decrease by quite a significant amount, but will not go to zero. This is because the payments aspect of bitcoin is already priced into its valuation. Once we take that out, the price will drop.
ridiculous. a gold alternative would drive the price to genuinely insane heights, far beyond a simple payment method. there's oceans of money swirling around the world looking for a place to go.
hardly anyone is using bitcoin to pay for anything and they never will. even if it could a billion tx per second for free, no one spends something that might be worth more tomorrow.
and why is the 'CEO' being asked about crypto anyway? ripple has nothing to do with genuine cryptocurrencies. but he is right about most losing most or all of their value. almost all of them are nothing more than casino chips.
If there is demand for something it has value. A lot of the cryptocurrencies have large communities behind them so i don't see that happening. He has a conflict of interest on this because he would like you to think that most are worth nothing but ripple is more valuable so therefore his opinion isn't valid anyway.
It took $320,000,000,000 to take Bitcoin to $20,000. it has all the signs of $320 billion PONZI
have you ever heard of market caps? 320 billion genuine dollars put into bitcoin would drive the price of one coin into the hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions.