Most Recognized Profiles (by BPIP) | Bitcointalksearch.org

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Timelord2067 on February 28, 2021, 08:44:04 AM

Didn't I read somewhere or other a while ago that someone was contemplating adding the merit circle score into the mix - instead of taking three scores by adding in the merit circle score they would have four scores to give a more even spread...

The only ones that matter are suchmoon and ibminer. When I designed BPIP, I built it on the three pillars that matr most - Merit, Activity, Trust.

Adding the merit circle in will wipe out recognition of people that used the system as intended - to reward good posts, not reward unique users.

I am currently the most recognized member, and have been for two years straight. But I understand the ranking is meant to be a temporal one, so I'm going to stop climbing and enjoy the long slide down.

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: LoyceV on November 07, 2020, 06:11:41 AM

Maybe the Largest Merit Circle can count for Recognition too

We all know why this won’t happen. It would be very damaging to someone’s ego who is no longer a merit source and wouldn’t be able to manipulate the metric. Otherwise, a good idea to improve the rating. Adding a length of time factor to the trust score calculation would also be a beneficial improvement.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Laudanum on February 28, 2021, 06:39:33 AM

Pharmacist ? All irrelevant to crypto in every conceivable way.

I wouldn't argue that for myself, but I never claimed to be a big shot in the crypto world. I'm not. I'm just one member out of millions on this forum and I'm no expert in crypto. What's your point? I haven't even looked at the BPIP rankings in a long time [Edit: since last time I posted in this thread, which was in November. Guess it wasn't that long ago.], so I don't know how "recognized" I am, but if I'm a somewhat recognized member it's only on this forum and not in the world of bitcoin in general.

Quote from: Laudanum on February 28, 2021, 06:39:33 AM

No reasonable claim to any recognition except being scammer supporters.

I don't support scammers and I don't think I'm recognized for that.

Quote from: eddie13 on February 28, 2021, 12:26:37 PM

I also think negative trusts should count just as much as positives..

Nah. Take a look at my trust page (or Vod's or any DT member who's busted a lot of scammers) and you'll see tons of negative retaliatory feedback that's untrue. Hell, I've got a feedback in there somewhere that says I abuse animals--and that's what you get when you have a trust system that's completely unregulated.

eddie13

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 2262

BTC or BUST

I’d like to see most times a users posts have been quoted and most times the username has been mentioned (include abbreviations such as TS, TP, SM, CH)..

I also think negative trusts should count just as much as positives..

Maybe not total merits, but the amount of unique users merit has come from..

qwk

donator

Activity: 3542

Merit: 3413

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: dkbit98 on November 06, 2020, 06:57:18 AM

Do you have any suggestions for improving this score?

Current list of 500:

Code:

8 qwk DT2 939.333 Donator 6/15/2011 3:01:04 PM 3 hours 8 minutes

Not really a suggestion, but just the fact that I personally am in 8th position is an indicator of something "wrong" about the wording "most recognized".
I am, I dare say, probably "most recognized" in my specific local community.
I am most likely not known to a helluva lot of the international community.

I won't raise any objections to this lunacy, because I like the way "8th most recognized" sounds. I do like the way it sounds... I mean, I like it a lot.

Quote from: The Martian

I know what they're doing. I know exactly what they're doing. They just keep repeating "go faster than any man in the history of space travel", like that's a good thing. Like it'll distract me from how insane their plan is. Yeah, I get to go faster than any man in the history of space travel, because you're launching me in a convertible. Actually it's worse than that, because I won't even be able to control the thing. And by the way, physicists, when describing things like acceleration do not use the word "fast". So they're only doing that in the hopes that I won't raise any objections to this lunacy, because I like the way "fastest man in the history of space travel" sounds. I do like the way it sounds... I mean, I like it a lot. [pauses] I'm not gonna tell them that.

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: Laudanum on February 28, 2021, 06:39:33 AM

Vod? Lfc? Pharmacist ? All irrelevant to crypto in every conceivable way. No reasonable claim to any recognition except being scammer supporters.

Three absolute legends of bitcointalk, early adopters, adored by their peers on the forum. Bow down to our superiority.

Our names will go down in history as the absolute titans we are Wink

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: Rikafip on February 28, 2021, 06:49:55 AM

why don't you ...

Didn't I read somewhere or other a while ago that someone was contemplating adding the merit circle score into the mix - instead of taking three scores by adding in the merit circle score they would have four scores to give a more even spread...

(unless of course we also add the most posts score - but then again is it really fair to add hundreds, if not thousands of posts that read "This thread has been moved to X,Y,Z..." that are automatically generated and don't actually contain any genuine post for the person they are attributed to??) Roll Eyes

Laudanum

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 23

Quote from: Rikafip on February 28, 2021, 06:49:55 AM

@Laudanum

Since bpip is by your own words "incapable of analysing real influence", why don't you make your own tool based on all those things that you mentioned? It's easy to talk what should have been done..

Well how about they just make available the data ranking I suggested.

I'm simply attempting to provide what the OP asks for.

I'm simply saying that the algo that claims to = recognition or repute is bogus.

It is good for data ranking but there could be more interesting stats.

Rikafip

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 5937

@Laudanum

Since bpip is by your own words "incapable of analysing real influence", why don't you make your own tool based on all those things that you mentioned? It's easy to talk what should have been done..

One thing is to say that some metrics should be removed/added, and another to say that current list is completely false. But even then, these kind of lists shouldn't be taken seriously anyway, not matter the way you calculate it. I know I don't.

Laudanum

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 23

Remove merit score

Calculate number of words posted

Calculate threads started.

Calculate number of alt communities posted in.

Calculate number of times username mentioned.

I mean Bpip is incapable of analysing real influence aka lasting variance due to actions taken so entirely pointless for real meaningful insight. But lol at merits handed around to each other in meta and wall observer making them well known or recognised to the wider community? Also I'm sure people are recognised here outside of what the board metrics can demonstrate VB Coblee,

I mean clearly satoshi would be number 1 untouchable if the above was possible.

I mean obviously the sad clown created the algo that gave him some relevance. However if I said point to even 1 contribution that vod has ever made that can be reasonably argued made any lasting difference here to the community in a big way ?

Crickets?? Right? Nothing?

That right.

Then think satoshi, gmax, several other developers, even huge scammers that changed the fortunes of tons of people and forced other solutions be found.

Vod? Lfc? Pharmacist ? All irrelevant to crypto in every conceivable way. No reasonable claim to any recognition except being scammer supporters.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Still the most recognized member and the only one that has always been trusted by default.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

I understand. I just thought the wording could be improved. :/

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: Vod on November 07, 2020, 12:46:27 PM

If I send to user A B C and users B and C send to me, is my circle counted as 3+2 or 3+0? I originally coded it as 3+0.

It's counted as 3. Using last week's data:

Code:

2. 6087 Merit received by LoyceV (#459836) from 649 unique users in 3389 transactions
2. 17342 Merit sent by LoyceV (#459836) to 1909 unique users in 7527 transactions

BPIP doesn't just add them together:

Code:

2 LoyceV DT1 2090 Legendary 2/26/2015 8:04:12 AM 22 minutes 12 minutes

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: LoyceV on November 07, 2020, 06:11:41 AM

Maybe the Largest Merit Circle can count for Recognition too

Quote

The top 1000 largest merit circle report is calculated by counting all unique profiles you have sent merit to plus every unique profile that has sent merit to you.

That sounds ambiguous.

If I send to user A B C and users B and C send to me, is my circle counted as 3+2 or 3+0? I originally coded it as 3+0.

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

If you were to include actual posts made by a user in calculating the Most Recognised Score, then users like Lauda's post score would have to be adjusted downwards considerably given the thousands (ten thousand potentially) posts that read "this thread has been moved to (name) section" in their capacity as an admin or mod. Such posts shouldn't count.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: dkbit98 on November 07, 2020, 05:38:48 AM

What about members who are well know as negative characters, for example gameprotect or c-hunter with all alt accounts and negative trust?

I think they should be higher on the recognition rank than they are. Yes, they are recognized as villains but they are recognized. This also is a good argument against feeding the trolls, including feeding them with negative trust ratings (not talking about game-protect who deserves them; but cryptohunter - not so much).

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

According to my notes, my Most Recognised score over the last eighteen months has been as low as 44 and as high as 30 and usually hovers around the 36-38 score.

At the end of this year my scores will probably be 135?, 108, 185?, 37, 280 and 239 .

By the end of August next year I will over take Lauda's score of Most Active (around about a score of 103 - Lauda's Most Recognised score will then be eight) and will be top 100 between then and the end of 2021 at about a score of 98 with the overall scores ??, 98, 160, 36, ?? and 205.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: dkbit98 on November 07, 2020, 05:38:48 AM

Maybe we should have ranking for 'villains' also

There is: Least Trusted Profiles.

Maybe the Largest Merit Circle can count for Recognition too (even though suchmoon took my #1 position with a humiliating lead): sending and receiving Merit to and from many different users means they've seen your name.
Or maybe just the number of Merit transactions received (at least that one I can win Tongue

).

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

I was thinking of including member mentions, if that is somehow possible to count what members have most mentions.
Also inactive members should have lower score I think.

Quote from: suchmoon on November 06, 2020, 09:15:23 AM

As for the recognition score in particular, negative trust, flags, and/or trust exclusions should technically be part of it. If someone cares enough to neg/flag/exclude you - you're "recognized", right?

What about members who are well know as negative characters, for example gameprotect or c-hunter with all alt accounts and negative trust?
Maybe we should have ranking for 'villains' also

It's interesting that with new BPIP extension alpha version you can enable and see rank on profile below activity.
For example yahoo:

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: yahoo62278 on November 06, 2020, 04:34:01 PM

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on November 06, 2020, 10:54:51 AM

In at 14, your boy LFC_Bitcoin.

I enjoy using BPIP, the only thing I’m disappointed in is my most trusted rating because I’m only 122nd. I feel I should be higher in that but hey Undecided

https://bpip.org/Profile?p=LFC_Bitcoin

Go buy and sell stuff in the Collectibles section. That's what some of the other members have done to get trust points.

Sheeeiiit son Cheesy

I’ll give that a miss tbh. No offence to anybody who enjoys that kind of thing but I have no need for that overpriced tat.

Topic: Most Recognized Profiles (by BPIP) (Read 696 times)