IcoGuide.com is very good platform, highly recommended.
Could you possible let us know what exactly it is that draws you to ICOguide over other rating sites?
Topic: Most Reputable ICO Grading Site? (Read 204 times)
Could you possible let us know what exactly it is that draws you to ICOguide over other rating sites?
We have looked into all of these suggestions and genuinely thank you for putting in the time to offer up options. We understand the sentiment surrounding sites like ICObench and ICOrating, so it looks as if ICOdrops and ICOguide should be looked into more. We don't want to be featured anywhere where it is seen as a bad look for innovative platform. Priding ourselves on transparency and reputation is of utmost importance at Bitbloq.io
IcoGuide.com is very good platform, highly recommended.
Personally, I trust icoraiting because they don't sell ico scores like other sites do.
honestly some people don't like rating sites, they don't believe it and rating sites are not a good place to find an investment recommendation. if an assessment or rating is only based on payment and is not objective, then I am very opposed to it and will not touch it.
For me it is www.icoguide.com, they have realistic and not paid rates and reviews.
I don't rate any of these ICOrating sites, they are into business and are there to make money, how do they make these money, selling rating, some of them rate some projects very high and end up a scam. If people try to research how an ICO is being run, ICO rating website have a huge role they play. Can anyone in the space voutch for any of these site. For me I don't like to name names because I care about brands but IMO they have done much damage than good.
As for me, most of these sites are sold. And this is not an indicator when choosing a project! You do not need to trust only this site, think also with your own head.
It's hard to tell an ICO rating site of repute. This is because reviews on those sites are usually paid for. So it's hard for them not to be biased in their ratings. If you want platform for Smart Contracts Then SciDex is creating a new contract that will be readable by human and machine, will be on the blockchain and can be used by normal businesses. And they are doing an ICO soon
I think that it is not possible to choose a particular ICO assessment site. On the Internet there is a sufficient number of sites that evaluate projects and they all differ. Each analyst has his own point of view and vision of the project. Therefore, assessments everywhere will be different and it will be difficult to stop at some site.
I often visit the icobench.com site, but what we can see is the ICO expert who works at the ICO and don't stick with a high rating
Well, I'm also looking at that sites every time I see new ICO but I will not depend on that alone because it can be manipulated as well. Some reviews on ICO's are being paid so better when you invest you still have your own knowledge about that project. Even the most reputable ICO reviews site can still be manipulated, so be careful and just enjoy your investing.
It does not exist, lol. Better not base ICOs' success on what's said on ICO rating and review websites, most of them are paid as what many people say. Good concept is still the best factor for me, but I doubt if there are still a lot out there.
In my opinion "NONE". Nearly every single website takes hefty amount of tokens to give a good rating to any ICO project. I have heard some good feedback about cryptobriefing website but I am not really sure about any stranger written articles anymore. Personally, I feel to use these websites only to get information about the upcoming ICOs and do my own research before investing any money in them.
Never use icobench or icoratings before but icodrops. I try to open your website but it's still blank pages, hope you can launch it as soon as possible.
Therefore, all ico that has a high ratings to their site is just a fake? Or we shouldn't believe instantly to their announcement about the ico project?
Well, I guess I think its true, they're doing it to get more fishes in this industry then as much as they can big fish, right? and the main basis for us to find still the good ico is the background of the owner, also the team behind the project and the flow of their project which can be readable to their road map or whitepaper.
I often visit the icobench.com site, but what we can see is the ICO expert who works at the ICO and don't stick with a high rating
Never use icobench or icoratings before but icodrops. I try to open your website but it's still blank pages, hope you can launch it as soon as possible.
it is very difficult to say which ICO sites are best because many sites receive payments from the ICO development team so I think the ICO website judges an ICO unfairly, I have seen several ICOs that have no assessments but are still developing and successful, I use the ico site only to find information about an ICO.
Forget ICO rating or grading sites and do your own research. Most of these guys or rather most of those sites are paid to list the projects you see there, especially the projects that make the top of the sites. I only rely on them to get to know new projects that have been launched and what they are all about, but I do not trust their judgments.
I didn't pay much attention to and evaluate an ICO grading site, there I only needed more information about the ICO, some sites like ICObech, ICOrate and other sites, promoting ICOs because they were paid, so in my opinion it would be better to learn about analysis and not too fixated on the rating displayed on the site, for now I prefer to use bountyplatform, I like that site because of its simple display design.
I personally do not rate ICOrating and ICObench as they mostly list a lot bad projects that hardly do well in the market. More so, they get paid to list and review a lot of their projects, so for me, I always feel they're sentimental in their judgement. ICOdrops comes close for me as they have listed some good projects that have done well in the past. I mostly rely for new projects to research on.
Jump to: