Devs are not replying to us! Be warn guys!
Hi there, i assure you i am replying to all of you, these things take time and i do not have huge amounts of time each day to respond to the 50+ messages as i am busy building the codebase, usually if you did not receive a reply its most likely because i have not gotten to your message yet OR your question was already answered quite a few times in the thread already
Thank you all for your tremendous support over the last few days, the early adopters fund has currently raised $119,557.30 @ 79% complete! There has been a couple of people questioning the legitimacy of the project, and i do remind all of you that thats exactly what it is
a project, i refuse to release blobs of incomplete code, i will be releasing only tested & bug free finalized code. I currently have a technical whitepaper being designed & written up, which will be a quality piece giving quite the insight into the technicals of zk-snarks and its function with Zeth. For the uncertain, i urge you not to invest until the release of the whitepaper, this way you can make up your own decision if its an investment worth placing your funds into.
Thats all for now, will be in touch tomorrow
Ben
ZETH - The InceptionCan you answer some questions that I think most of us are wondering?
-It seems bitcoin investments into the ICO are in separate BTC addresses for each ICO investor, why aren't they moved into one BTC address (ICO investment address) and posted here. Total ICO funds seems unclear and spread in different addresses.
-More details on the 2 new members of the team (Gian and Kev), providing names without being able to see their qualification, past work or at least something that proves their real.
-If those 2 members turn out to be real, why haven't you posted you're profile? I just don't find it logical to post real names of the team and yet the founder, creator and main dev is still anonymous.
-With regards to development, we understand that you'd like to present something that actual works then pieces of code that doesn't work. Can you atleast show something? Screenshots, anything that would provide proof of development?
To be honest anyone doing their research today would see this as a scam, I think the least you could do is prove it's not.