Just a gawker here— but I'm wondering where this has gone?
MP recently lost a case on his own court where he is claiming he is entitled to keep any funds accidentally sent with the wrong amount of btc. I guess his scamming will never end.
When the whole mess collapses people should remember this scammer thread as an early signal.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1480609 linky.
Right, except that's (again) exactly the opposite of what happened.
Here's the 130 + 10 being refunded: f1a1e66ba18da90b47c7b6da344dc11d22098e0b0839ae17e3bbde9308a2ac00
Here's the judges being paid: 861f4fc30f56ff2488efe86e195354ef0dc89f73be0ff1aec62707ff4ccfccb2
afac444e8ccf169f1298e8de1ea6ef0d4845d01401bef9d919923f8e740650f9
There's only two because we're not quite to the level where we can actually follow rules and instructions, as a "community".
So what now? You've presented as fact something that not only wasn't a fact, but was quite exactly the opposite of reality. You're not the first idiot to do this, and this isn't the first time you people (=idiots) do this about MPEx. The bullshit with "GLBSE has more volume when MPEx was doing per month about 10x GLBSE's LIFETIME VOLUME) back last summer readily springs to mind.
So what now? Do I ask for you to be banned? Do I ask for you to pay a fine? Do I what?
It's ok that you worthless scumbags get to interact with the people that matter. It's not ok that you don't manage to interiorize the fact that you actually are worthless, and actually are a scumbag, as a sort of structural defect. Your continued pretense to act as if forumnobody = big time Bitcoiner, same thing, is what's actually keeping you stuck in your rags, packing mud.
Not that you can possibly get it already.
Usually the person involved in the scammer accusation comes forward to state their case and its telling that MP himself wont do so but uses a "PR" account. In most cases where the accused fails to defend their actions they get a scammer tag. So the question I ask is why someone cant speak for themself and needs to use a PR flunky. Unless that scammer is using a fake account of course.
Im still waiting for Mirceau Popescu to defend himself personally or does he get a pass where no one else does ?
P.S. In almost all cases where someone uses a woman as their forum avatar they turn out to be a scammer.
Not sure what your issue is with that case - which I've just looked at.
Noone was ever accused of scamming in it - someone sending you unsolicited funds isn't scamming. Looks like it was taken to this rota thing as a test without any attempt at sorting it out otherwise first..
Seems clear to me that MP's disagreement with the rota is NOT that he was ordered to return the funds. It IS that he ended up paying the costs when the mistake was clearly (and admitted to be) someone else's. If someone fucks up then THEY pay whatever costs are associated with rectifying the problem - NOT someone who was involved in the mistake without any desire, intent or action to cause the mistake. I don't use MPEx but, from what I understand, the disclaimer that funds sent in error would be kept wasn't properly published - which is the only reason for the rota to order their return at all.
Many times people have been scammer tagged for refusing to send back money mistakenly sent to them. For example Bulanula and Terry Tibbs are two I can think of off hand. Even if a bank gives you funds by mistake and you spend them you go to jail.
