Documents sent last friday afternoon (2013-04-26 ~14:00 UTC): position in the queue= 16720
This morning (2013-04-29 08:00 UTC) : 13760
This morning (2013-04-29 08:00 UTC) : 13760
Thanks, info added
Topic: Mt. Gox approval queue - (updated with current numbers) (Read 29329 times)
Thanks, info added
Just keep opening accounts under false names and sending in bogus docs. 
That's what I've been doing. So far I've sent in 14,200 applications...
Does nobody have an update on their queue position?
Just keep opening accounts under false names and sending in bogus docs.
Thanks to Seleme for the latest update
Does nobody have an update on their queue position?
Unfortunately no.
I'm having a hard time getting people to give me an update on their queue positions.
I'm having a hard time getting people to give me an update on their queue positions.
any new updates?
Updated
learn to read and READ the whole string. I am not saying anything of the sort. I answered a question from someone who claims they COULD NOT do something which they CAN DO. Then someone said it would be ILLEGAL. IT IS NOT as they do not have ANYONE governing what they do in regards to seg.
Get it? Read the first time and stop projecting. You are a fool.
Get it? Read the first time and stop projecting. You are a fool.
Ok, so you're a bit volatile so I'll be brief.
There was no question about whether Mt.Gox can do this or not.
I said it would be illegal for them to do this as they're taking other people's funds to pay other parties. They're still liable for the Bitcoins even if the whole thing tanks. This activity would be no different if Mt. Gox took the Bitcoin themselves and spent it on fast cars or loose women.
Just because an activity has no oversight doesn't make it legal.
I can only assume your first language isn't English as your posts are really difficult to follow... or maybe it's just me and my comprehension skills aren't what they used to be.
Regardless, you need to make your point with a little less anger. I'm sorry for whatever is going on in your life right now that's making you this unhappy but really, taking it out on strangers on a forum isn't going to help at all.
Good luck.
learn to read and READ the whole string. I am not saying anything of the sort. I answered a question from someone who claims they COULD NOT do something which they CAN DO. Then someone said it would be ILLEGAL. IT IS NOT as they do not have ANYONE governing what they do in regards to seg.
Get it? Read the first time and stop projecting. You are a fool.
Get it? Read the first time and stop projecting. You are a fool.
Ok, so you're a bit volatile so I'll be brief.
There was no question about whether Mt.Gox can do this or not.
I said it would be illegal for them to do this as they're taking other people's funds to pay other parties. They're still liable for the Bitcoins even if the whole thing tanks. This activity would be no different if Mt. Gox took the Bitcoin themselves and spent it on fast cars or loose women.
Just because an activity has no oversight doesn't make it legal.
I can only assume your first language isn't English as your posts are really difficult to follow... or maybe it's just me and my comprehension skills aren't what they used to be.
Regardless, you need to make your point with a little less anger. I'm sorry for whatever is going on in your life right now that's making you this unhappy but really, taking it out on strangers on a forum isn't going to help at all.
Good luck.
Yes, they claim to restrict deposits and withdraws because they are following money laundering laws. SEND ME THE URL WHERE THEY CITE WHO IS OVERSEEING THAT THEY SEGREGATE FUNDS?
Try learning to read, you are starting to piss me off.
Try learning to read, you are starting to piss me off.
Seems like you have anger issues.
You're asking someone to prove a negative. It's not possible.
This isn't evidence they're doing anything wrong.
I'm not saying they're not doing anything wrong. You're making the claim - you need to back that up.
Get it? Read the first time and stop projecting. You are a fool.
Yes, they claim to restrict deposits and withdraws because they are following money laundering laws. SEND ME THE URL WHERE THEY CITE WHO IS OVERSEEING THAT THEY SEGREGATE FUNDS?
Try learning to read, you are starting to piss me off.
Try learning to read, you are starting to piss me off.
Seems like you have anger issues.
You're asking someone to prove a negative. It's not possible.
This isn't evidence they're doing anything wrong.
I'm not saying they're not doing anything wrong. You're making the claim - you need to back that up.
That can't be legal.
Really? how naive are you? Mt Gox is following the money laundering laws but name the organization that is regulating how they conduct business? You are complete fools if you leave deposits there. The winklevoss' did not not (and they are spoiled idiots) and yet you do?You're saying Mt. Gox does this.
Try learning to read, you are starting to piss me off.
Any updates on the queue numbers?
Unfortunately I've heard no more from the users that are in the queue.
If anyone else has any information I'd love to hear from them.
That can't be legal.
Really? how naive are you? Mt Gox is following the money laundering laws but name the organization that is regulating how they conduct business? You are complete fools if you leave deposits there. The winklevoss' did not not (and they are spoiled idiots) and yet you do?You're saying Mt. Gox does this.
What is a bold claim? That the winkelvoss' did not leave money on the exchange? Read their quote yourself hero.
It's a bold claim you're making of Mt. Gox. And what's with the name calling or are you just being over familiar?
Any updates on the queue numbers?
What is a bold claim? That the winkelvoss' did not leave money on the exchange? Read their quote yourself hero.
It's a bold claim you're making of Mt. Gox. And what's with the name calling or are you just being over familiar?
Well I'm glad to see at least some people have the sense to follow what has been going on here. Yeah, MtGox didn't "stop trade" back when BTC went up 150% in two days. They did however as the price was falling and they needed a little time to beg, borrow and steal enough to be able to settle their gaping short position. Hurr durr.
Yes, it's circumstantial evidence, and yes they are idiots. Nevertheless, never attribute to plain stupidity that which also could be explained by malice. You'll live longer that way.
PS: She.
Yes, it's circumstantial evidence, and yes they are idiots. Nevertheless, never attribute to plain stupidity that which also could be explained by malice. You'll live longer that way.
PS: She.
I'm absent from these forums for months at a time, sometimes even years so I don't really know who you are so apologies if I've mischaracterised you but you seem awfully angry at something (you've got 3000 posts to your name so you might have a lot to be angry about - I really don't know).
I agree with you that it's circumstantial and I'll agree that you'll protect yourself by being cynical.
May I ask, are you pro or anti-bitcoin?
Edited: Removed last question because it was THIS thread
YOU CANNOT. Unless, you use the numbers from the "deposits" (which ARE NOT yours to use) When someone deposits, the money goes into the exchange (it should be segregated but in the failures of exchanges it does not seem to have been (even corzine was not doing seg properly). If you were doing this, you are basically "borrowing" others money and using it to short to make the commission to keep the flow going).
That can't be legal.
Anyone can make a bold claim.
Can you back it up with evidence?
Jump to: