Pages:
Author

Topic: MTgox add litecoin in 2 month ? (Read 3561 times)

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 02, 2013, 12:22:09 AM
#29
If you say so.

Best of luck in your investment.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 02, 2013, 12:18:08 AM
#28
Bitcoiners, you still haven't answered any of my points.

Also, I found this:

Of course we dont need that many, but what is stopping people from competing and improving. Look at how many credit cards there are.

Feathercoin improves nothing. Oh, 4 times more coins.  LOL, there is zero reason why feathercoin is valued as much as it is in the first week of its' debut.

Feathercoin is for people/noobs who missed the BTC boat and the LTC boat and who can't mine even LTC efficiently with their rigs anymore. This is why FC even exists, oh also for get rich quick scammers.  It is a parasite.
 
I won't do business with anyone trying to hype FC. I put them on ignore immediately.

Oh, ignore op.

Cheers.



I find this deliciously funny.  Cheesy

Oh, sorry I put you on ignore earlier...  Don't worry, I'll put you back on ignore once I've answered.

And your questions that have already been answered many times over in other threads.  LTC is on schedule for the devs putting out a massive update on LTC, any day now.  Take the time to read.  Learn something.  Sorry I'm done answering to trolls, idiots, and people that can't see the forest for the trees.  You are no longer worth my time.

LTC is going to Gox.... Deal with it.

Cheers.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
May 02, 2013, 12:09:41 AM
#27
Nope sorry.  No logic.  Neither the wiki nor the poster uses logic.  LTC is going to Gox.  It's time for BTCers to deal with it.  No matter what you say you can't change that LTC is headed to GOX.  Defame all you can it's futile and we all see right through it.

Really?

Quote
problem is; its just a copy of btc with holes in it and there is no development behind it to improve upon it.

I wonder, is it susceptible to the same fork we had some weeks ago? Lastest Bitcoin version is patched, but is Litecoin?
The github repo shows no activity in the code for at least 6 months.

Are the contracts implemented in Litecoin?

Are there multisignature transactions?

Is there a block size limit? Will it be removed/modified?

Has anyone looked to add Zerocoin on top of Litecoin?

I see a bunch of dedicated developers for Bitcoin, but I don't really see anything on the Litecoin side, except some people trying to hype it.

IMHO its biggest problem atm: someone arranges 300K half-decent CPUs and the network will be 51%ed, not that difficult for some botnet operators.

If LTC can survive for another 1-2 years, with the network hashrate growing by another 10-fold, I can see it as "here to stay", now it still isn't.

I think in Satoshi's paper, the argument for why you wouldn't expect a 51% attack was that it wouldn't be economical for the attacker. That's still true for Litecoin. You wouldn't make money doing it, you would just cause chaos.

But what if Litecoin got to a point at which it was threatening Bitcoin, and someone decided that by performing a 51% attack on litecoin, crashing the price, their bitcoins could be worth much more money.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 02, 2013, 12:09:27 AM
#26
Bitcoiners, you still haven't answered any of my points.

Also, I found this:

Of course we dont need that many, but what is stopping people from competing and improving. Look at how many credit cards there are.

Feathercoin improves nothing. Oh, 4 times more coins.  LOL, there is zero reason why feathercoin is valued as much as it is in the first week of its' debut.

Feathercoin is for people/noobs who missed the BTC boat and the LTC boat and who can't mine even LTC efficiently with their rigs anymore. This is why FC even exists, oh also for get rich quick scammers.  It is a parasite.
 
I won't do business with anyone trying to hype FC. I put them on ignore immediately.

Oh, ignore op.

Cheers.

I find this deliciously funny.  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 11:56:43 PM
#25
My guess is that we will actually(for once) see a real cryptocurrency bubble as people flock to buy Litecoins for "cheap," as they missed out on buying cheap bitcoins.  Then once the price has risen substantially, it will crash, and people will again turn to bitcoin and wonder why they bought litecoin in the first place.  Maybe...

lol.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
May 01, 2013, 11:54:02 PM
#24
My guess is that we will actually(for once) see a real cryptocurrency bubble as people flock to buy Litecoins for "cheap," as they missed out on buying cheap bitcoins.  Then once the price has risen substantially, it will crash, and people will again turn to bitcoin and wonder why they bought litecoin in the first place.  Maybe...
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 11:30:45 PM
#23
Where did the notion that it will happen in 2 months come from? All I saw from the MtGox statement was "soon"

Op started the notion.  The new trading platform will be released in around a month from now.  I see litecoins being release before or with it.

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
May 01, 2013, 11:29:26 PM
#22
Where did the notion that it will happen in 2 months come from? All I saw from the MtGox statement was "soon"
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 11:26:20 PM
#21
Guys, stop quoting me if none of you answer my questions!  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
May 01, 2013, 11:24:29 PM
#20
Nope sorry.  No logic.  Neither the wiki nor the poster uses logic.  LTC is going to Gox.  It's time for BTCers to deal with it.  No matter what you say you can't change that LTC is headed to GOX.  Defame all you can it's futile and we all see right through it.

Really?

Quote
problem is; its just a copy of btc with holes in it and there is no development behind it to improve upon it.

I wonder, is it susceptible to the same fork we had some weeks ago? Lastest Bitcoin version is patched, but is Litecoin?
The github repo shows no activity in the code for at least 6 months.

Are the contracts implemented in Litecoin?

Are there multisignature transactions?

Is there a block size limit? Will it be removed/modified?

Has anyone looked to add Zerocoin on top of Litecoin?

I see a bunch of dedicated developers for Bitcoin, but I don't really see anything on the Litecoin side, except some people trying to hype it.

IMHO its biggest problem atm: someone arranges 300K half-decent CPUs and the network will be 51%ed, not that difficult for some botnet operators.

If LTC can survive for another 1-2 years, with the network hashrate growing by another 10-fold, I can see it as "here to stay", now it still isn't.

I think in Satoshi's paper, the argument for why you wouldn't expect a 51% attack was that it wouldn't be economical for the attacker. That's still true for Litecoin. You wouldn't make money doing it, you would just cause chaos.

One reasonable scenario is someone with vested interest in Bitcoin trying to ruin the LTC network, let alone the possibility that government/corporations will back such an attack.

What will be the source of a possible attack is not important, the important thing is that investors still can not see the LTC network as a reliable alternative to the BTC network.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
May 01, 2013, 11:17:17 PM
#19
Nope sorry.  No logic.  Neither the wiki nor the poster uses logic.  LTC is going to Gox.  It's time for BTCers to deal with it.  No matter what you say you can't change that LTC is headed to GOX.  Defame all you can it's futile and we all see right through it.

Really?

Quote
problem is; its just a copy of btc with holes in it and there is no development behind it to improve upon it.

I wonder, is it susceptible to the same fork we had some weeks ago? Lastest Bitcoin version is patched, but is Litecoin?
The github repo shows no activity in the code for at least 6 months.

Are the contracts implemented in Litecoin?

Are there multisignature transactions?

Is there a block size limit? Will it be removed/modified?

Has anyone looked to add Zerocoin on top of Litecoin?

I see a bunch of dedicated developers for Bitcoin, but I don't really see anything on the Litecoin side, except some people trying to hype it.

IMHO its biggest problem atm: someone arranges 300K half-decent CPUs and the network will be 51%ed, not that difficult for some botnet operators.

If LTC can survive for another 1-2 years, with the network hashrate growing by another 10-fold, I can see it as "here to stay", now it still isn't.

I think in Satoshi's paper, the argument for why you wouldn't expect a 51% attack was that it wouldn't be economical for the attacker. That's still true for Litecoin. You wouldn't make money doing it, you would just cause chaos.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
May 01, 2013, 11:15:00 PM
#18
Nope sorry.  No logic.  Neither the wiki nor the poster uses logic.  LTC is going to Gox.  It's time for BTCers to deal with it.  No matter what you say you can't change that LTC is headed to GOX.  Defame all you can it's futile and we all see right through it.

Really?

Quote
problem is; its just a copy of btc with holes in it and there is no development behind it to improve upon it.

I wonder, is it susceptible to the same fork we had some weeks ago? Lastest Bitcoin version is patched, but is Litecoin?
The github repo shows no activity in the code for at least 6 months.

Are the contracts implemented in Litecoin?

Are there multisignature transactions?

Is there a block size limit? Will it be removed/modified?

Has anyone looked to add Zerocoin on top of Litecoin?

I see a bunch of dedicated developers for Bitcoin, but I don't really see anything on the Litecoin side, except some people trying to hype it.

IMHO its biggest problem atm: someone arranges 300K half-decent CPUs and the network will be 51%ed, not that difficult for some botnet operators.

If LTC can survive for another 1-2 years, with the network hashrate growing by another 10-fold, I can see it as "here to stay", now it still isn't.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 11:04:14 PM
#17
NMC is hitting Gox as well. Should be interesting.

Indeed. Namecoin I can support; I see what new feature it can bring.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 11:03:30 PM
#16
Nope sorry.  No logic.  Neither the wiki nor the poster uses logic.  LTC is going to Gox.  It's time for BTCers to deal with it.  No matter what you say you can't change that LTC is headed to GOX.  Defame all you can it's futile and we all see right through it.

Really?

Quote
problem is; its just a copy of btc with holes in it and there is no development behind it to improve upon it.

I wonder, is it susceptible to the same fork we had some weeks ago? Lastest Bitcoin version is patched, but is Litecoin?
The github repo shows no activity in the code for at least 6 months.

Are the contracts implemented in Litecoin?

Are there multisignature transactions?

Is there a block size limit? Will it be removed/modified?

Has anyone looked to add Zerocoin on top of Litecoin?

I see a bunch of dedicated developers for Bitcoin, but I don't really see anything on the Litecoin side, except some people trying to hype it.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
May 01, 2013, 11:02:03 PM
#15
NMC is hitting Gox as well. Should be interesting.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 10:49:06 PM
#14
Wild retard uses logic.

It's super effective.

Nope sorry.  No logic.  Neither the wiki nor the poster uses logic.  LTC is going to Gox.  It's time for BTCers to deal with it.  No matter what you say you can't change that LTC is headed to GOX.  Defame all you can it's futile and we all see right through it.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 10:46:58 PM
#13
Wild retard uses logic.

It's super effective.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 10:22:23 PM
#12
problem is; its just a copy of btc with holes in it and there is no development behind it to improve upon it. their own wiki states it is a pump and dump scheme. not cool guys.

And a wild retard approaches....

Lol.  I think this sums up all the idiots in bitcoin-la-la-land.

LTC is here to stay.  Deal with it.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
May 01, 2013, 01:10:10 PM
#11
I have a video here proving that Litecoins are a better investment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOCKm4aEIXE  Wink

(Obviously, I'm sarcastic.)
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
May 01, 2013, 12:49:46 PM
#10

their own wiki states it is a pump and dump scheme. not cool guys.


That's currently all Luke-jr's doing, as far as I can tell.  https://twitter.com/LTCBTC/status/329069888494776321
Pages:
Jump to: