http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
Fox will have it up to 2.5 Million BTC by Friday.
Topic: Mt.Gox Bankruptcy - CNN States 1.75 Million BTC Lost (Read 4168 times)
Fox will have it up to 2.5 Million BTC by Friday.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
"Mt.Gox learned Monday that 1.75 million bitcoins held by the company and its customers had disappeared, according to Teikoku Databank, a Japanese bankruptcy tracking firm."
CNN was a victim of the known sentence malleability bug.
lol
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
"Mt.Gox learned Monday that 1.75 million bitcoins held by the company and its customers had disappeared, according to Teikoku Databank, a Japanese bankruptcy tracking firm."
CNN was a victim of the known sentence malleability bug.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20972718/Three%20Dead%20Trolls%20in%20a%20Baggie%20-%20Safe%20Bank.mp3
have a listen. dont bank with gox, bank with imperial dominion!
Irresponsible journalism at it's finest complete hacks. The term Due Diligence escapes them.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
I like reading such crap in the press about topics I am knowledgeable about. They remind me that articles about topics I have no clue about are probably crap, too, even if I lack the knowledge to see it. Such as gas attacks in Syria or revolts in Ukraine.
+1
One of those many things that Bitcoin taught me that has nothing to do with money
The mentally challenged media in the states keep saying ' bankruptcy' . They should stick to reporting dog shows and celebrity gossip.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
"Mt.Gox learned Monday that 1.75 million bitcoins held by the company and its customers had disappeared, according to Teikoku Databank, a Japanese bankruptcy tracking firm."
It was lost in transaction.
Waiting for FOX to report that it was 17.5 million 
And that they just printed more to cover their losses.I can see it.
"Well why dont they just.. like, mine another 500k and give it to the exchange???"
one year ago the price was at 36$. 64Mio$ are missing. 64 000 000/36 = 1.175Mio.
Waiting for FOX to report that it was 17.5 million
And that they just printed more to cover their losses. 
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
I like reading such crap in the press about topics I am knowledgeable about. They remind me that articles about topics I have no clue about are probably crap, too, even if I lack the knowledge to see it. Such as gas attacks in Syria or revolts in Ukraine.
That was exactly my thinking when I was reading things about bitcoin on some local known journals.
If only there were some mechanism or system out there to handle the micropayments for people doing the work.. hmmm.....if only....
Wow, great idea!
Why don't we create a digital currency... based on cryptography... without anyone controlling it... we could call it: 'bytecoin'.
Nick.
sounds like they added 750,000(clients) and what was supposed to be 100,000(company), but they saw 1,000,000. Sad that armchair bloggers are more scrupulous than MSM and have been for some time.
My solution: (Steal this idea)
Someone build a "skin" plug-in that sits on top of the articles, people can use the skin to rate sentences one by one. True, False, half-truth, unverifiable, etc.. the aggregated input is then calculated, and the plug-in will display the community consensus on the quality of the article. You can look up authors past scores. You can see the score for a single sentence. Contributors would get compensated by revenue generated by ads the plug-in presents while editing, maybe some contributors input is worth more than others. If only there were some mechanism or system out there to handle the micropayments for people doing the work.. hmmm.....if only....
My solution: (Steal this idea)
Someone build a "skin" plug-in that sits on top of the articles, people can use the skin to rate sentences one by one. True, False, half-truth, unverifiable, etc.. the aggregated input is then calculated, and the plug-in will display the community consensus on the quality of the article. You can look up authors past scores. You can see the score for a single sentence. Contributors would get compensated by revenue generated by ads the plug-in presents while editing, maybe some contributors input is worth more than others. If only there were some mechanism or system out there to handle the micropayments for people doing the work.. hmmm.....if only....
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
I like reading such crap in the press about topics I am knowledgeable about. They remind me that articles about topics I have no clue about are probably crap, too, even if I lack the knowledge to see it. Such as gas attacks in Syria or revolts in Ukraine.
they counted all the fingers of all the journalists they employ and halved it.
Wouldn't zero divided by two still be zero?
sorry, that should have read 'interns' i stand corrected
http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/28/investing/mt-gox-bankruptcy/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
Wonder where they got that number?
Wonder where they got that number?
"Mt.Gox learned Monday that 1.75 million bitcoins held by the company and its customers had disappeared, according to Teikoku Databank, a Japanese bankruptcy tracking firm."
Clueless, irresponsible reporting
Not really a surprise but very disappointing
Not really a surprise but very disappointing
Waiting for FOX to report that it was 17.5 million
they counted all the fingers of all the journalists they employ and halved it.
Wouldn't zero divided by two still be zero?
Jump to: