Topic: Multi bets vs single bets - page 14. (Read 61732 times)
I have done a lot of experiments and I think that it is better not to bet, even your favorite team with odds of 1.01 is easy to lose, bets are the usual roulette, in which you will stay anyway - on your balance if you bet only on the team, because you are a fan and believe in this team
Preferably, I prefer single bets than the multiple bets, single bets with good research will yield more wins because of the odds that are likely to be. The multiple bets sometimes are not good because one odd from the multiple game can render one efforts useless. Most of my bets are done on a single bet and have been yielding good result than the multiple bets and it disadvantages.
Same here where i do make out single bets rather than on making multibets.I dont just like to wait up for that long for me to see if i would win.Yes, odds are quite nice but as expected where the risk is much more higher compared if you do make out some single bets.Once the game is over then you do know the outcome
then you can make another one not like on multi where waiting up is much longer since you do need to finish the games that are in line.
Its a matter of preference though yet there are gamblers who are really that fan on playing up multi-games or parlays due to nice odds.
Preferably, I prefer single bets than the multiple bets, single bets with good research will yield more wins because of the odds that are likely to be. The multiple bets sometimes are not good because one odd from the multiple game can render one efforts useless. Most of my bets are done on a single bet and have been yielding good result than the multiple bets and it disadvantages.
So my question is whether you prefer multi bets to single bets and whether you find multi bets significantly more risky than single bets.
It seems to me that the answers to your questions are known in advance. Of course, multi bets are much more risky than single bets. This is normal. In order for the multi bet to work, you must guess several events, which is more difficult to do than guessing a single event. That is why the odds on the bets is much higher and is calculated from the number of events in a multiple bet.
Those who are professional bettors prefer to play single bet. Because it is profitable and very suitable for long run. If you want to survive in sports betting, you have to play single bet.
There is a possibility of earning a large amount by playing with small stake in combo bet, but remember if you lose in a selection in overall multi bet, you will lose all other stakes, Very hard to win.
There is a possibility of earning a large amount by playing with small stake in combo bet, but remember if you lose in a selection in overall multi bet, you will lose all other stakes, Very hard to win.
By multi-betting, do you mean parlay right?
Generally, neither of two can't give us an assurance that we can win most of the time. By doing parlay, aside from maximizing the best odds we can get, we consider those low odds "as safe" since likely it can win. However, as usual in sports betting, there are unexpected results and so-called upsets.
I prefer single betting but I do parlays if I want. Honestly, both are entertaining to do.
That's the challenge in sports-betting. The output will depend on our own strategy and knowledge.
This is why i dont really play with parlays even on 3 multi games only and tend to play with single which i do like even odds arent really that appealing.Upsets can really happen anytime and
basing of with my experience with 5-game parlay where my last game was a loss which really make me to punch a wall due to frustration.
By multi-betting, do you mean parlay right?
Generally, neither of two can't give us an assurance that we can win most of the time. By doing parlay, aside from maximizing the best odds we can get, we consider those low odds "as safe" since likely it can win. However, as usual in sports betting, there are unexpected results and so-called upsets.
I prefer single betting but I do parlays if I want. Honestly, both are entertaining to do.
That's the challenge in sports-betting. The output will depend on our own strategy and knowledge.
"Accumulators" as they are known are one of the biggest and best sources of income for gambling (sportsbook-type) institutions. That should tell you that they are not a good thing for gamblers. They are one of the best sources of revenue because the odds are heavily stacked against the person placing the bet - they might misunderstand the mathematics behind it and tend to think of it as a simple win/loss equation, but you really just end up with 3 chances to lose in a 3 way bet. It's similar to betting on a roulette wheel in many ways and everyone is aware that there is no way to beat the house edge in that scenario. If you have to bet on a regular basis, as your previous experience shows (although it is a insignificant sample) - then you'll get much more consistent results by placing individual bets. I always stick with single bets unless there is a very special offer that makes an accumulator worthwhile.
Of course, multi bets are more risky because in this game the odds are combined and eventually the winnings become very serious. And where high chances of serious multiplication of funds are always very high chances to lose these funds. In my opinion, multi bets are more suitable for beginners or if you play for small amounts.
In my little experiment from the past, I was betting on Sportsbet.io on very likely outcomes with very low odds (1 point something). I won three single bets in a row:
But after a discussion on this forum I accepted the idea that these low odds give very low profit and are not worth the effort. So then I thought: why not make a multi bet consisting of these very likely winners and boost the profit this way? I decided to give a multi bet which combines three of such very likely outcomes a shot. And... I lost it because two out of three one and in one case another team won.
So my question is whether you prefer multi bets to single bets and whether you find multi bets significantly more risky than single bets.
But after a discussion on this forum I accepted the idea that these low odds give very low profit and are not worth the effort. So then I thought: why not make a multi bet consisting of these very likely winners and boost the profit this way? I decided to give a multi bet which combines three of such very likely outcomes a shot. And... I lost it because two out of three one and in one case another team won.
So my question is whether you prefer multi bets to single bets and whether you find multi bets significantly more risky than single bets.
Jump to: