My new favorite betting method. - page 4.

Wapfika

hero member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 564

Bitcoin makes the world go 🔃

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 08:58:54 PM

Quote from: shasan on August 02, 2023, 07:50:13 PM

On each bet, you are increasing the betting amount and at the same time, you are increasing your odds for which there is an increasing losing chance on the bet. And in this way, there is a low chance to e a winner as on each bet you are increasing the odds. As a result, the possible loss is higher than being the winner.

The odds is a nice topic to talk about, what are the odds to hit an x10? 1/10, what are the odds to hit an x100? 1/100... so, when you are chasing an x540 you have done x539 bets, so, feels like we are moving with the odds, in other words, while lowering the chance to win then more bets on the line.

I was confused on reading the OP but good to see this statement of yours for the confirmation before I post here. The strategy is interesting and very greed at the same time. High risk high reward method but with gradual increase is what makes this method interesting to me. This is a good method if there’s a script that we can use on a casino since dice auto mode has limited function which doesn’t have the increased of win chance rate on next bet.

I remember that you created other experiments like this before so I knew that you already tested this before you post. How many total bets you have and what’s the profit ratio in terms of your total bets?

Stepstowealth

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 145

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

It seems to be working for you and the game you gamble on, but it is not an applicable method to everyone on the games they gamble. Plus your strategy requires a lot of discipline to stick to a betting amount, many gamblers are not disciplined and may not like to follow a strategy book when gambling, it takes the fun away and still does not give any assurance that you will win, so at the end after following up a strategy, you will be surprised that you did not have fun and you did not still win at same time, double loss.

leonair

sr. member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 390

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

I know, in the example looks like a lot of money to bet, but now think about starting from 0.00000002 BTC or better known as 2 satoshis, with increments of 1 satoshi, you can be betting in the long run with 0.001 btc.

To do this I hire a guy to make a betting bot for a casino, and is looking good, is really hard to find a losing run with it.

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

It can be a good strategy Because we should bet small amount at the starting time. and we should gamble long time with small amount to understand gambling pattern then we should use some extra money. Gambling with a low fund limit will not result in a huge loss. And they may be recoverable at some point. But if you start gambling with a big amount in the beginning, you will lose a lot of amount, then if you panic, there will be a risk of losing more.

boltz

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1187

This method is already bad from start as you decrease your chances to win by each bet you place during that betting run. Sure , you can have a strain of luck and you will hit 4 consecutive wins but the chances for this to actually happen is pretty low , especially now when bookies are involved in almost every sport and sponsor teams all over the world. Pretty much , stick to simple betting and forget that there is a formula to actually make you a rich from betting. Grin

Gozie51

hero member

Activity: 2520

Merit: 624

From the table, my mind goes to martingale kind of betting and it is not far from it because you are adding up odds and betting stake each following game like you want to make up for the previous game. I think if this strategy goes wrong then it will accumulate alot of losses for you. I have only tested such in soccer game when I expect I'm going to have a win. Martingale is good when in profit.

piebeyb

legendary

Activity: 2296

Merit: 1038

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

It's been a long time since I played Dice, but it looks like this method can be used in the Limbo game because it won't be much different from the game, I haven't tried this betting method, I always change the martingale betting strategy and always lose, but maybe I'd be happy if you share the results of the method this even though I know that it is difficult to beat the bookie.

If this method works and is profitable without losing, obviously the casino will read this and change the existing system, that's why I think you need to try it repeatedly because if you only try it once in a while maybe you are lucky and happen to win so you can't be sure that this method is correct really works fine. I need you to do some more research and share more here. maybe I'll try it in the Limbo game

benalexis12

full member

Activity: 798

Merit: 117

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

I know, in the example looks like a lot of money to bet, but now think about starting from 0.00000002 BTC or better known as 2 satoshis, with increments of 1 satoshi, you can be betting in the long run with 0.001 btc.

To do this I hire a guy to make a betting bot for a casino, and is looking good, is really hard to find a losing run with it.

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

This kind of tactics is called martingale if I'm not mistaken. Is this method effective for you? there's just a little difference and that's adding one to its sum for every loss and when you win, you go back to the beginning of the bet, right?
but I will try to do what you said, because it is actually new in my eyes. But of course when someone testifies that it is effective and casino insiders see it, I am pretty sure that the casino platform will take a step for this matter.

yahoo62278

legendary

Activity: 3626

Merit: 4440

What's your biggest red streak thus far and highest multi you have hit? You've only tried this on just dice? I would be curious to know if different sites have different results, maybe try 1 of the other dice sites and update us.

If we wanted to try this ourselves we would have to code a bot or find 1 like suentjie correct? None of the sites that i know of have a way to set up their site bot like this.

Crypt0Gore

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 274

I am glad this strategy is working for you but do not feel like you are smarter than any casino because your game can change later on, this strategy brings profit for you more than loss but it can still change to more losses than profit, I have learned the hardest way, when it comes to gambling on any casino with such any strategy it doesn't always work well, at first it will work for a long period of time or short period of time but it won't always be the same there will be a time that it will change totally so always treat the gambling as a gamble it is not something you can rely on because you have a gambling strategy, anything can change at any time.

Kakmakr

legendary

Activity: 3458

Merit: 1961

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

This method will fail like all the Martingale methods that failed in the past. The thing is.... the +1 multiplier can quickly add up to a significant loss in a long losing streak. This will wipe out all gains from previous wins that you had with this method.

It is very true, when they say the house always wins, because the math is working against us. I can say from personal experience that I have tried most of the variants of this strategy and I have never succeeded. Tongue

davis196

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 913

Basically you are one of the gamblers, who think that they could outsmart the casinos by "inventing" some "genius" betting strategy that was never seen before. Grin

In most cases, those "genius" betting strategies are just a variation of martingale.
The bad news is nobody can outsmart the casinos. The "betting strategy" doesn't matter. The casino always wins. Stop trying to make consistent profits out of gambling and just play for fun. Good luck with all those betting bots, that are running on virtual private servers.
I hope that you will make enough money to retire and go the Bahamas. Grin

swogerino

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1233

It is just a Martingale with extremely low amount and we already know here by many times that Martingale is destined to fail because of two things we miss: first is the infinite bankroll that we don't have and in computer software controlled games you can have even 100 losing rolls and this would not be surprising and second the casinos already know about Martingale and they have put limits in place to hold people from using this method.

So if you are playing with an extremely low starting bankroll does not mean that until you reach from 2 satoshi to 100.000 satoshi that you will be a winner.

Haunebu

hero member

Activity: 3080

Merit: 970

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

This isn't something new op. What you mentioned is just a modified version of Martingale which @Poker Player already pointed out. Such a strategy could most probably burn through your funds very, very quickly.

Why? Because it's a negative progression strategy. Loss streaks of 10 or higher are very common at 2x odds.

m2017

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1296

keep walking, Johnnie

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

I know, in the example looks like a lot of money to bet, but now think about starting from 0.00000002 BTC or better known as 2 satoshis, with increments of 1 satoshi, you can be betting in the long run with 0.001 btc.

To do this I hire a guy to make a betting bot for a casino, and is looking good, is really hard to find a losing run with it.

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

Another method to beat the casino? This game is obviously on a foreign field and against a player with a clear advantage.

Aren't bets in a casino using bots (any game process automation systems) prohibited? Are you not afraid that your account will be banned, lose your deposit and possibly be blacklisted with the inability to play in this (and possibly other) casino?

Have you tried this method yourself? What results have you achieved? Win or lose?

iv4n

legendary

Activity: 3164

Merit: 1175

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 08:58:54 PM

But I would like to focus the conversation in the betting method, now I'm rolling with 50 balance and starting bet is 0.000002 with 000001 increments. it looks something like this:

You have some awesome hits already... I like your "new favorite betting method". I didn't have fun with some expert settings for a while, but this is inspirational, I think I will try it these days.

So JustDice has some expert settings? I get that you increase the bet with 000001 after every loss, but what about the multiplier? How did you set it up?

OgNasty

donator

Activity: 4760

Merit: 4323

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Poika5 on August 02, 2023, 08:14:19 PM

I'm not sure if you are trolling or not.

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

You don't have an infinite bankroll. Eventually, you will hit a losing streak so large that it bankrupts you.

Quote

$10,000 - x10,000

The casino sets its own betting limits based on its risk profiles. Nobody would take this bet because it could bankrupt a casino.

I’m sure there are casinos that would take that x10,000 bet, but you’re right that there are no for sure gambling methods. The longer you play, the more likely it is that you will go broke. Methods like this seem like they’re great and will always win you money, but when it turns on you it will bankrupt you as stated. There are no free rides.

Poker Player

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 2017

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

It sounds to me like a variant of the Martingale, but more sophisticated.

Quote from: Poika5 on August 02, 2023, 08:14:19 PM

...

You don't have an infinite bankroll. Eventually, you will hit a losing streak so large that it bankrupts you.
...

The casino sets its own betting limits based on its risk profiles. Nobody would take this bet because it could bankrupt a casino.

Precisely the reasons why it is impossible to win in Martingale.

Trying such a strategy temporarily because you want to complete some wagering requirements to level up, reach the VIP level in the room or something, I could understand it, but at the end of the day you are playing an EV-game. You will not be able to beat the HE, no matter what strategy you use.

Sim_card

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 414

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

I know, in the example looks like a lot of money to bet, but now think about starting from 0.00000002 BTC or better known as 2 satoshis, with increments of 1 satoshi, you can be betting in the long run with 0.001 btc.

To do this I hire a guy to make a betting bot for a casino, and is looking good, is really hard to find a losing run with it.

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

This strategy will only lead one to more loss because as the money increases,also the odd increases which gives you lower opportunity of winning the game. Although, I haven't come up with such idea but I think this can only be applied to dice and not sportbet. Especially football because if you try this method on sportbet,it wouldn't work since settling down for 2.0 odds is the best way one can make profit or win the game on football. Have you given it a try and did it work for you ?

tusandii

hero member

Activity: 1540

Merit: 521

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

I know, in the example looks like a lot of money to bet, but now think about starting from 0.00000002 BTC or better known as 2 satoshis, with increments of 1 satoshi, you can be betting in the long run with 0.001 btc.

To do this I hire a guy to make a betting bot for a casino, and is looking good, is really hard to find a losing run with it.

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

If it works, it's a very profitable betting method, but it's difficult to be able to get multiples like that in betting and of course each betting option has different odds, so bets that we like and understand may not necessarily be able to provide that multiple.
This is a method that is almost the same and is used quite a lot by some of my friends, but I myself don't think about this method because every bet I make depends on the betting option itself.

If you look at it and think about it, it's a method that is quite difficult for most gamblers to understand.
But if you always succeed with this method, you can definitely get big profits with every win.

Mr.suevie

sr. member

Activity: 546

Merit: 342

Quote from: shasan on August 02, 2023, 07:50:13 PM

Quote from: seoincorporation on August 02, 2023, 07:39:28 PM

The logic behind this betting method isn't complex at all. You bet $2 on x2 and on the next bet you sum +1 to the bet amount and it looks something like this:

Code:

$2 - x2
$3 - x3
$4 - x4
$5 - x5
...
$10,000 - x10,000

I know, in the example looks like a lot of money to bet, but now think about starting from 0.00000002 BTC or better known as 2 satoshis, with increments of 1 satoshi, you can be betting in the long run with 0.001 btc.

To do this I hire a guy to make a betting bot for a casino, and is looking good, is really hard to find a losing run with it.

So, what do you think about this betting method, Has someone tried it in the past?

On each bet, you are increasing the betting amount and at the same time, you are increasing your odds for which there is an increasing losing chance on the bet. And in this way, there is a low chance to e a winner as on each bet you are increasing the odds. As a result, the possible loss is higher than being the winner.

I don't like playing any other sports apart from soccer and tennis and with what the OP is trying to explain I don't think this strategy is actually going to work for me as I prefer more of parley selection where I would accumulate a total of 2.0 odd with different games of about 3-4 which reduces the risk involved in each game to come successful and of course parley selection deals with all the games to actually turn out correctly because if one goes wrong all is gone.

Topic: My new favorite betting method. - page 4. (Read 586 times)