Topic: My Satoshi Nakamoto Hypothesis (Read 298 times)
My attention is drawn to you in more detail about the hypothesis, Perhaps there really are no coincidences in this world, everything is related to each other. The digital footprint will slowly open. To the extent that all of this can be proven very legitimately. If it can be accounted for, then for me you provide me with new information, although it is still not enough to cure our curiosity about what you have conveyed.
Considering your data very well might be related, it would be foolish to assume that Satoshi has done ALL the work by himself, maybe 95%, but he still needed help. But I doubt that it’s him.
First, the styles in which they write are different (spaces, quotes, words in a sentence, etc.). Second, the latter (Pieter Wuille) doesn’t seem to hide his identity. If it took you only 20 minutes to find out this info, don't you think the real Satoshi would’ve been more careful about these things?
First, the styles in which they write are different (spaces, quotes, words in a sentence, etc.). Second, the latter (Pieter Wuille) doesn’t seem to hide his identity. If it took you only 20 minutes to find out this info, don't you think the real Satoshi would’ve been more careful about these things?
Interestingly, you gave me another thought, that 20 is still not enough to prove this hypothesis to be true. Imagine 20 minutes? whereas many analysts who spent more than 20 minutes to find out who Satoshi was still not convinced of the real truth. Even though it's as far as a strong reference, could it be that one day he really came to the surface or was he already dead?
No one knows, even identity becomes a big question. For that I will not think too far, given my limited analytical skills, so I better save this big question mark for future generations. Just do what I can do for Bitcoin's progress so that it can continue to grow and be continued by the next generation. Isn't that our job today?
Good hypothesis, but from a psychology standpoint each one of us is unique and thus has its own peculiar things. A man with a bright mind that was capable of creating Bitcoin is certainly special like every one of us. 
My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.
While you are correct and people have different motivations we also need to consider that satoshi was afraid to be put into jail, after all do you really think that if we knew who satoshi was that he will still be free and not in jail? Governments would have tried to accuse him of all kind of crimes, satoshi knew this and decided to never reveal his identity, also if we knew who satoshi was governments could have tried to destroy bitcoin by using character assassination techniques and try to discourage people from adopting bitcoin that way. My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.Why you want sathosi to be jailed.He is the god,who created this new crypto world.Being a bounty hunters,we are very loyal to him and support him at any cost.He may be the hidden king,whose identity was deleted with purpose.Only the co founder or marketing team will know the real sathosi.Sathosi is not a matter and his creation should be appriciated.
Good hypothesis, but from a psychology standpoint each one of us is unique and thus has its own peculiar things. A man with a bright mind that was capable of creating Bitcoin is certainly special like every one of us. My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.
While you are correct and people have different motivations we also need to consider that satoshi was afraid to be put into jail, after all do you really think that if we knew who satoshi was that he will still be free and not in jail? Governments would have tried to accuse him of all kind of crimes, satoshi knew this and decided to never reveal his identity, also if we knew who satoshi was governments could have tried to destroy bitcoin by using character assassination techniques and try to discourage people from adopting bitcoin that way. My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.Why you want sathosi to be jailed.He is the god,who created this new crypto world.Being a bounty hunters,we are very loyal to him and support him at any cost.He may be the hidden king,whose identity was deleted with purpose.Only the co founder or marketing team will know the real sathosi.Sathosi is not a matter and his creation should be appriciated.
Good hypothesis, but from a psychology standpoint each one of us is unique and thus has its own peculiar things. A man with a bright mind that was capable of creating Bitcoin is certainly special like every one of us. My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.
While you are correct and people have different motivations we also need to consider that satoshi was afraid to be put into jail, after all do you really think that if we knew who satoshi was that he will still be free and not in jail? Governments would have tried to accuse him of all kind of crimes, satoshi knew this and decided to never reveal his identity, also if we knew who satoshi was governments could have tried to destroy bitcoin by using character assassination techniques and try to discourage people from adopting bitcoin that way. My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.
Sometimes I really do wonder how this can affect us, but I have come to understand whether we know who he is or not, it doesn’t add anything at all. The project has been growing without him so what’s the need of having me around again? It doesn’t add anything at all.
And if he was around then, and not anonymous as he is, I don’t think it would have ended pretty well for him, because the government would have not treated him in a good way. Just look at how the government treated the person that was suspected to be him, so imagine if it was really him? So, I guess he took the best decision. And the way he developed to not have a central control unit is really the best thing he did for us, if not the government would have ended this earlier, forget the fact that they seem to be liking it now.
And if he was around then, and not anonymous as he is, I don’t think it would have ended pretty well for him, because the government would have not treated him in a good way. Just look at how the government treated the person that was suspected to be him, so imagine if it was really him? So, I guess he took the best decision. And the way he developed to not have a central control unit is really the best thing he did for us, if not the government would have ended this earlier, forget the fact that they seem to be liking it now.
This your research is great, everybody has a different opinion to when he last posted but I know Satoshi Nakamoto knows himself as well as several others. It might be funny that some people might have guessed right about whom he is but no legal ground.
I appreciate your hard work in finding news and looking for information to find assumptions like this I really appreciate it
but there are a few things that deviate from what i know because what i know is that Satoshi was last active on bitcointalk it was 2010 not 2011.
other than that back to the statement at the beginning. this is your own prediction, it could be right and it could be wrong apart from that, there is still no clarity and it is still a secret until now
but there are a few things that deviate from what i know because what i know is that Satoshi was last active on bitcointalk it was 2010 not 2011.
other than that back to the statement at the beginning. this is your own prediction, it could be right and it could be wrong apart from that, there is still no clarity and it is still a secret until now
Satoshi may have used another account to stay hidden, we don't know that much and all we have are mere speculations, and I honestly think that it'd be better if Satoshi would remain hidden, let's all accept the fact that it's a bad idea if the creator of Bitcoin gets to be discovered, even if years go by, I really think that Satoshi is going to stay anonymous.
Does it matter who is Satoshi Nakamoto? For the entire digital currency market, if the emergence of Satoshi Nakamoto cannot give Bitcoin new value power, then, what does it matter who is Satoshi Nakamoto?
To explore who Satoshi Nakamoto is is just to satisfy people's curiosity. We need to look more rationally. We look forward to the appearance of Satoshi Nakamoto in the hope that he can once again bring important value to Bitcoin. Otherwise, whether he appears as an individual or as a team, there will be no value. .
More important than a person is, what value does this person produce?
Thank him silently for creating this miracle.
To explore who Satoshi Nakamoto is is just to satisfy people's curiosity. We need to look more rationally. We look forward to the appearance of Satoshi Nakamoto in the hope that he can once again bring important value to Bitcoin. Otherwise, whether he appears as an individual or as a team, there will be no value. .
More important than a person is, what value does this person produce?
Thank him silently for creating this miracle.
I first learned that the bitcoin creator was anonymous in 2017. I immediately spent the next 20 minutes researching.....
1) -- (2 minutes) A simple google search taught me that "Satoshi Nakamoto" is his screen name on bitcoin talk. He simply quit posting after he finished creating bitcoin.
Actually bitcoin inventor been Satoshi Nakamoto did a nice thing by introducing the bitcoin as a digital currency, despite that i could not meet him via Bitcointalk community, i think what he did is perfectly correct by leaving the community after introduction of the forum, because assuming he was still on board different people would have channelling ambiguous questions to him and expect him to return or answer their questions here via the documents and fluctuations of bitcoin. 1) -- (2 minutes) A simple google search taught me that "Satoshi Nakamoto" is his screen name on bitcoin talk. He simply quit posting after he finished creating bitcoin.
Bro your prediction could be god damn right. The days so much similar and the posibility of the coincidence is so hard. Those guys could really know the satoshi so what? How it can affect us and our investments?
That could change everything definitely but its just a dream that satoshi will gonna come out from being anonymous. Ive been researching some articles and of course some of his previous post here in forum and my theory is he is Nick Szabo. I dunno if it just my gut feeling but who knows lol.
Not moving the coins in the satoshi wallet doesnt mean this person/ppl dont own TONS of bitcoin in other wallets.....cmon bro. That wallet is a failsafe
Prove something from anything you say and don't just act smart and blab things like a broken machine. I have checked writing styles thoroughly -- they are nothing alike. Same with coding style. And I personally believe that was done 100% intentionally.
You saying that you checked everything without posting some proof or explanation means nothing.Maybe you can fake your writing style, that is tedious work and I don't understand why would Satoshi be motivated to do this for so long without ever moving his coins, but changing coding style is very hard or even impossible to accomplish.
Not moving the coins in the satoshi wallet doesnt mean this person/ppl dont own TONS of bitcoin in other wallets.....cmon bro. That wallet is a failsafe
I have checked writing styles thoroughly -- they are nothing alike. Same with coding style. And I personally believe that was done 100% intentionally.
You saying that you checked everything without posting some proof or explanation means nothing.Maybe you can fake your writing style, that is tedious work and I don't understand why would Satoshi be motivated to do this for so long without ever moving his coins, but changing coding style is very hard or even impossible to accomplish.
I don't like these guessing games anymore since there is not any smoking gun.
there are a number infinite of hypothesis about the real identity but without a clear proof we can see just clown claiming to be satoshi and not else
there are a number infinite of hypothesis about the real identity but without a clear proof we can see just clown claiming to be satoshi and not else
Good hypothesis, but from a psychology standpoint each one of us is unique and thus has its own peculiar things. A man with a bright mind that was capable of creating Bitcoin is certainly special like every one of us. My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.
My point is that not everybody has a need for attention and fame. There are people who just want to do meaningful things and not be the center of attention. Just imagine the amount of publicity and renown he would get if he revealed himself. One needs to think deeply about his lifestyle when making such decisions.I absolutely agree. Especially for something like this. He is a visionary -- he knew the implicatons which could accompany it. Stress, lawsuits, headaches, etc.... Look at all the stress the cardano guy has gone through. Now, put that on a 10,000x scale. This guy is FAR too bright to put himself in that position.
Bro your prediction could be god damn right. The days so much similar and the posibility of the coincidence is so hard. Those guys could really know the satoshi so what? How it can affect us and our investments?
But it could all just be coincidence, I mean I registered about 4 days after some random user but that doesn't mean that I am them unless I am an alt. But despite all that, I think we can never be sure because the only way for us to confirm our own set of theories is if we were to ask Wulle himself, and it's also another factor, will he lie or tell the truth or evade the question?I agree. But also, why would he go through all of this only to tell us? lol
Also, ive asked in the past -- no response.
Pieter Wuille may be one of the many candidates for Satoshi Nakamoto but you need to provide more proofs for your hypothesis if you want to prove he is really Satoshi.
You need to compare writing styles and other things, not just 4 days registration difference between Satoshi and Pieter Wuille, that proves nothing.
One thing is sure about Satoshi identity - he is not Craig Wright aka Faketoshi, anyone else is possible candidate including Pieter Wuille.
You need to compare writing styles and other things, not just 4 days registration difference between Satoshi and Pieter Wuille, that proves nothing.
One thing is sure about Satoshi identity - he is not Craig Wright aka Faketoshi, anyone else is possible candidate including Pieter Wuille.
I have checked writing styles thoroughly -- they are nothing alike. Same with coding style. And I personally believe that was done 100% intentionally. This guy(s) far brighter than us, look at all he has accomplished. Anonymity was a breeze. Thats why I assumed it had to be "That itch". He may have planned to never post again, or to "clumsily" stumble upon bitcoin later on "accidentally". however, 4 days was all he could fight the itch
Bro your prediction could be god damn right. The days so much similar and the posibility of the coincidence is so hard. Those guys could really know the satoshi so what? How it can affect us and our investments?
But it could all just be coincidence, I mean I registered about 4 days after some random user but that doesn't mean that I am them unless I am an alt. But despite all that, I think we can never be sure because the only way for us to confirm our own set of theories is if we were to ask Wulle himself, and it's also another factor, will he lie or tell the truth or evade the question?
Pieter Wuille may be one of the many candidates for Satoshi Nakamoto but you need to provide more proofs for your hypothesis if you want to prove he is really Satoshi.
You need to compare writing styles and other things, not just 4 days registration difference between Satoshi and Pieter Wuille, that proves nothing.
One thing is sure about Satoshi identity - he is not Craig Wright aka Faketoshi, anyone else is possible candidate including Pieter Wuille.
You need to compare writing styles and other things, not just 4 days registration difference between Satoshi and Pieter Wuille, that proves nothing.
One thing is sure about Satoshi identity - he is not Craig Wright aka Faketoshi, anyone else is possible candidate including Pieter Wuille.
Jump to: